This I agree with, but I wish he would have said (not that it matters) when asked that question in the original interview that we can't look at 2028 when we have 2026 knocking at our door. Basically "If Gavin wants my vote in 2028, he has to see what is happening in 2026 and adjust accordingly or get left behind."
Not this vote 3rd party shyt. Even in the video provided with him talking to the young guy, he also admits there is no viable 3rd party. If we say that and instead of bullshytting, say Gavin needs to be more like Mamdani or AOC or whomever he prefers, say that! There has to be implied "This is what we want" when you have an audience that big otherwise it's just asking sauce pans to not be a sauce pan when you need a skillet. You find skillets in primaries: don't gas up these people talking about "You have to move to the left", force it by highlighting those already there.
Part of the reason the Democrats were searching for a leftist Rogan is not because they wanted to educate, they want someone who connects to people on a level where there is no depth but you draw them into the tent. They miss the fact that people who are liberal, and definitely left, don't want the same thing as people on the right. Folks like Hassan have an opportunity to get specific and not play into the voter apathy, especially if he tip-toes into bothsides territory.
I can only speak for myself, but the genocide in Gaza by Biden was the last straw of voting for the "lesser of two evils". The only way the Dems will change if they keep losing elections. If we keep voting for the lesser of two evils, the Dems will never change their duplicitous behavior.
In 2028, if they run a Zionist bootlicker despite the base being overwhelmingly against Israel, then they will deserve to lose. Then they will blame the voters despite the voters telling them way ahead of time that support for Israel is a non starter.