Dameon Farrow
Superstar
demonize vasectomies, brehs
What made these women think things were gonna change the second time around.












It's obvious these females are flocking to him to get knocked up
He's seen as top tier and desirable because all the bytches want him
Women are attracted to that shyt regardless of dude's baggage
They're probably thinkin "damn his dikk game must be A-1."
These females don't give a fukk and he doesn't either.
![]()

a woman would rather share a "top of the line nukka" than to have her own faithful poindexter
80% of nukkaz ar smashing 20% of women
It's obvious these females are flocking to him to get knocked up
He's seen as top tier and desirable because all the bytches want him
Women are attracted to that shyt regardless of dude's baggage
They're probably thinkin "damn his dikk game must be A-1."
These females don't give a fukk and he doesn't either.
![]()
I never understand the baby mommas that are repeat offenders. He averaged two kids with each women probably within intervals of procreating with the other women. What made these women think things were gonna change the second time around. The idiocy here is just astounding on all fronts by all parties![]()

I remember in another thread, they were talking about women who sleep with "ain't shyt nikkas," apparently this guy has a successful career, so at least the child-support check is coming through nice
I dont know who to be mad at... the dude who gives no fukks about procreating a plethora of children, or the women that continue to sleep with him without any type of birth control.
Can't hate on the women, because they could've done a hell of a lot worse.There is nothing inherently wrong with having many children as long as you have the financial resources to sustain such a large family. A rich person can hire a team of nannies and baby sisters to help him out. A rich person can adequately provide healthcare, education, food, clothes, shelter for all the kids no problem. The problem is when someone who doesn't have a steady income procreates indiscriminately.
Personally I wouldn't impregnate 17 women. I'm just upset at all of the brainwashed eugenicists morons who think even having 2 kids is too much. Yes, believe it or not I know people who think like this.
It has nothing to do with the kids. nikkas with kids are usually *pretty good* with women, if he could slide up in 17 something women without a condom, that's a testament to his ability to get women to have sex with him, there's something about him (probably his personal success) that helps him get in bed with various women. So its just chicks in the hood love nikkas who are good with women.Chicks in the hood for some reason love nikkas with kids.
Having more than three kids really is too much, unless you're a stay at home parent, or can have them far enough apart. You can't truly adequately parent more than three kids if you also have a career, that's obvious. If you don't really know your kids, their habits, their troubles, their tendencies, or even their friends, than you really are not doing your job fully. And the vast, vast majority of parents who have more than three kids aren't doing their job fully. Its not being a eugenicist, we just don't need to have 10 kids to work on the farm and feed the pigs before they die at 32 from yellow fever or cholera or in childbirth.There is nothing inherently wrong with having many children as long as you have the financial resources to sustain such a large family. A rich person can hire a team of nannies and baby sisters to help him out. A rich person can adequately provide healthcare, education, food, clothes, shelter for all the kids no problem. The problem is when someone who doesn't have a steady income procreates indiscriminately.
Personally I wouldn't impregnate 17 women. I'm just upset at all of the brainwashed eugenicists morons who think even having 2 kids is too much. Yes, believe it or not I know people who think like this.