Having Female Friends is a Beta Male Trait

[Guile]

Depends on the person.

Iwould only get close to/let women get close to me if I'm attracted to them. Women who don't fall into this category are kept at a distance.

Some people just strive to forme bonds with people, so I can understand if they have female friends.

 

[FastEddie215]

chris rock broke this shyt down perfectly in this video

 

[The Maverick]

I'm married, breh. fukk I look like BFFing some random chick just because? How much "female perspective" does a man need? I'm off sharing common interests with my BFF while m wife is at home? Nah, son. My wife is my female friend plus a whole lot more. You're allowing yourself to be short changed.

And all that wingman shyt is pretty soft if you ask me. You can't pull a chick without help? That seems like the deeper issue to me.

When I meet women they tend to fall in love with me. I learned the secret to their psyche young so I know if you do certain things, they fall. Simple as that. So for women who think I'm sexist for not having female friends they're not even considering most times women are guilty of what they're claiming I'm guilty of and that's wanting more. It's annoying to me to have unattractive, physically or personality-wise, trying to get with me all the time. Women can be heartless whether they know it or not and take advantage of a fellow. That's not my style. I'll immediately break a chick's heart before she gets any fantasies. That's mercy.

Damn I remember this co-worker who was highly fukkable but I was already married so it was a no go. She was cool. We worked together so that's one of the exceptions I talked about. But she used to annoy me and I had to check her on several occasions because she used to call me "love of my life." Like that was my name. "Hi, love of my life." If I'm the love of her life she set herself up for a disappointing love life.

Acquaintance? Cool. BFF? Beta. Only females I chill with these days are friends of my wife. They're cool but I would never chill with them 1 on 1.

You're going from one extreme to the other. Female best friends is a totally different thing when you're a married man. But I'll say this, I understand where you're coming from and will just have to disagree. Dudes that say they can't be friends with a woman under any circumstance unless they are fukking are weird to me.

 

[AITheAnswerAI]

So you guys with a lot of female friends are basically just using them to get at their friends? And how successful has that been? And what's it like meeting the nikka who is actually smashing the girl you wanted to smash initially, but got denied and settled for being "friends"?:screamina:


I see a lot of nikkas who don't get any p*ssy but HOPE they get put on by the chick who rejected them, and keeps them around for attention and favors are getting angry in here.

 

[Duckman]

A fine gentleman of culture and refinement such as I, Victorian Thug: nobility and grace p'rsonified, dost not! liketh the contemp'rary so call'd men of this age! hast any female acquaintances thats I keepeth just as cat'r-cousins, fie! I puteth thine fine wenches and thots to their meeteth duty.

This is a funny user but what bothers me [as a person obsessed with history] that he calls himself Victorian yet he has the image of William Shakespeare and talks Middle English and the Victorian age was in the 1830s-1900.

 

[Mike Tyson]

So you guys with a lot of female friends are basically just using them to get at their friends? And how successful has that been? And what's it like meeting the nikka who is actually smashing the girl you wanted to smash initially, but got denied and settled for being "friends"?:screamina:


I see a lot of nikkas who don't get any p*ssy but HOPE they get put on by the chick who rejected them, and keeps them around for attention and favors are getting angry in here.

I smashed my friend's Vietnamese friend. I don't see what the big deal is here. Most my friends are female and I have two homies lol

 

[Duckman]

So you use men for whatever you want. Disgustingly selfish.

That's like me saying "I just use her for sex. I don't see her as 'the friend' type. Besides, I can get friendship anytime I want."

You coli women are the worst.

Is a woman supposed to sleep with every man, breh?
I don't understand how men on here expect a woman to give it up yet complain that modern women are whores.
#thelogic

You guys are talking like it's literally impossible for a man to have a female companion whom he trusts and considers her his confidant. :o

 

[Duckman]

Nah that is what you're saying.

Yo meet a guy. He has intentions. But you curb him and instead dictate what YOU want out of the relationship. He offers friendship and sex, you only take what you want: the friendship.

If a man did the same thing only with a different motive you'd be up in arms. See the double standard? See the hypocrisy?

You're taking what you want and that's all. Definition of selfish. And you're taking advantage of his beta maleness because he wants something but doesn't have the balls to get it.

Good lord, the bitterness of males from the Anglosphere [generally] towards the fairer sex is truly a frightening thing to behold.
A woman is supposed to have sex with a man because he desires her?
If she does not desire him, and to have sex with him solely because that is his desire - is that not a selfish act?
What if said woman views her sexuality as a gift and something only shared between the love of her life, her partner? Not a man whom she wants to keep as her bosom, her dear compeer.

My fellow, what you say does not make much sense - and many of your opinions seem to be based on your personal thoughts rather than objectivity which makes you seem a little silly and not very bright, a blatherskite in a sense, why would one want to befriend someone who only wants them for the purpose of a sexual relation and has his indignation piqued towards the chaste woman?

What if the woman's mores and scruples, do not allow her to stomach the thought of having sex with a man she does not consider to be her lover, or even her husband?
Why is that selfish?
Because you are thinking of your own carnal lusts and impulses,
is that not the definition of selfish? To think of one's own passions and not the others, or how the woman might think?

:o

 

[Jesus Shuttlesworth]

Good lord, the bitterness of males from the Anglosphere [generally] towards the fairer sex is truly a frightening thing to behold.
A woman is supposed to have sex with a man because he desires her?
If she does not desire him, and to have sex with him solely because that is his desire - is that not a selfish act?
What if said woman views her sexuality as a gift and something only shared between the love of her life, her partner? Not a man whom she wants to keep as her bosom, her dear compeer.

My fellow, what you say does not make much sense - and many of your opinions seem to be based on your personal thoughts rather than objectivity which makes you seem a little silly and not very bright, a blatherskite in a sense, why would one want to befriend someone who only wants them for the purpose of a sexual relation and has his indignation piqued towards the chaste woman?

What if the woman's mores and scruples, do not allow her to stomach the thought of having sex with a man she does not consider to be her lover, or even her husband?
Why is that selfish?
Because you are thinking of your own carnal lusts and impulses,
is that not the definition of selfish? To think of one's own passions and not the others, or how the woman might think?

:o

Sounds great but who said just sex? I'm not a man whore. What if a man has every intention of marrying the young lady? His wish is to be her lover but she friend zones him. It's my position that a man who accepts that role as friend when he desires a bigger role as lover is a beta male.

You're generalizing and assuming which is why your post is so off base. Why do you think a man wanting to sleep with a woman is all about lust and objectification?

fukk outta here with that bullshyt for you know noteth what you speaketh.

 

[Duckman]

Sounds great but who said just sex? I'm not a man whore. What if a man has every intention of marrying the young lady? His wish is to be her lover but she friend zones him. It's my position that a man who accepts that role as friend when he desires a bigger role as lover is a beta male.

You're generalizing and assuming which is why your post is so off base. Why do you think a man wanting to sleep with a woman is all about lust and objectification?

fukk outta here with that bullshyt for you know noteth what you speaketh.

I am not "off-base", if you call a lady who refuses to bed a man 'selfish' then you are driven mad by your own impulses and desires rather than your fairness.
What if the woman already has a man whom she wants to share her life with?
You appear not to understand where I am coming from, unfortunately your words are as constricted as your wit.

Say if the man has a strong attraction to the woman, but the woman in question has a boyfriend, however he is emotionally attached to the woman and so is she, and they have excellent rapport with each other; should he ignore his desires and satiate them else where while keeping this woman for a companion, or should he let them override his mind and leave her because his intentional purpose without seeing the development was not satisfied?

There are multiple dimensions to a person's feelings, always; you CANNOT narrow it down to this way or the other, to do so is an attack on the complexities of the human mind and emotion and that is as futile as holding your head down and closing your eyes refusing to see the other truths.

Are you telling me with a straight face that wanting to have sex with a woman and leaving her be despite the potential of friendship [and that idea rouses your interest] is NOT lust?
Is lust NOT a human emotion?
Is being selfish NOT a natural human impulse?

Why is that 'beta', in your opinion, to stay friends with a woman you fancy?
As I said before, you cannot narrow it down to one little reality and expect others to fit in a little box when there are several shades between white and black.

 

[Jesus Shuttlesworth]

I am not "off-base", if you call a lady who refuses to bed a man 'selfish' then you are driven mad by your own impulses and desires rather than your fairness.
What if the woman already has a man whom she wants to share her life with?
You appear not to understand where I am coming from, unfortunately your words are as constricted as your wit.

Say if the man has a strong attraction to the woman, but the woman in question has a boyfriend, however he is emotionally attached to the woman and so is she, and they have excellent rapport with each other; should he ignore his desires and satiate them else where while keeping this woman for a companion, or should he let them override his mind and leave her because his intentional purpose without seeing the development was not satisfied?

There are multiple dimensions to a person's feelings, always; you CANNOT narrow it down to this way or the other, to do so is an attack on the complexities of the human mind and emotion and that is as futile as holding your head down and closing your eyes refusing to see the other truths.

Are you telling me with a straight face that wanting to have sex with a woman and leaving her be despite the potential of friendship [and that idea rouses your interest] is NOT lust?
Is lust NOT a human emotion?
Is being selfish NOT a natural human impulse?

Why is that 'beta', in your opinion, to stay friends with a woman you fancy?
As I said before, you cannot narrow it down to one little reality and expect others to fit in a little box when there are several shades between white and black.

Negged


And didn't read.

 

[Duckman]

Negged


And didn't read.

This proves my first impression of you, a naif, softheaded fool.
These people always prove my superiority and intelligence over them.

 

[13473]

he can still be alpha. perhaps women don't view him as a mate because he's gay. I know an alpha gay father & son pair and they ain't nothing to mess with

 

[Jesus Shuttlesworth]

This proves my first impression of you, a naif, softheaded fool.
These people always prove my superiority and intelligence over them.

Elliot Rodger thought he was smart too. And he was also a virgin.

What school you go to?

 

[Duckman]

Elliot Rodger thought he was smart too. And he was also a virgin.

What school you go to?

He was a ill-disposed man who complained about women being superficial and callous to his advances while only focusing his attention to a literal stereotypical ideal of beauty [American,slim,blond,white,blue eyes]. His views were silly and he was very frustrated, unfortunately his opinions are a common echo and archetype on messages boards; so are yours with your attitude towards women.
I am a woman, I don't know why you're making this comparison.