Heads Up the 2015 mustang went on sale... :banderas:
- Thread starter ORDER_66
- Start date
I would have to clean it everyday but it might be worth it
LordTaskForce
All Star
Although I agree with you about people should buying what they want & what not
But the other half of your statement is
I'VE DRIVEN THAT 1ST & 2ND MUSTANG.
Mordith
H.E.N.R.Y.
Only on the coli would people actually believe this.
THE VIDEO BACKING UP MY CLAIM? OR THE ACTUALLY STATS FOR BOTH CARS?
Mordith
H.E.N.R.Y.
Stock 2011 CTS V http://www.dragtimes.com/Cadillac-CTS-V-Timeslip-26449.html 11.9 quarter mile trap speed ~119 mph.
Bone stock 2013 5.0
As you can plainly see the CTS V is considerably faster stock for stock.
I
Stock 2011 CTS V http://www.dragtimes.com/Cadillac-CTS-V-Timeslip-26449.html 11.9 quarter mile trap speed ~119 mph.
Bone stock 2013 5.0
As you can plainly see the CTS V is considerably faster stock for stock.
I
2013 AND 2015 MUSTANG ARE TWO TOTALY DIFFERENT CARS. YOU POST A VIDEO OF SOME GUY DRIVING. FIRST VIDEO HAS PROFESSIONAL DRIVERS.
2011 CTS V IS NOT THE SAME AS THE 06 THE OTHER POSTER SAYS HE HAS. REREAD THE THREAD.
Mordith
H.E.N.R.Y.
Ok I missed that it was a 2006 V that was being discussed. As far as the Stang is concerned the '15 car is even slower that the '13-'14 model due to the new chasis weighing more....
http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/coupes/1409_2015_ford_mustang_gt_first_test/
Ok I missed that it was a 2006 V that was being discussed. As far as the Stang is concerned the '15 car is even slower that the '13-'14 model due to the new chasis weighing more....
3800 LBS WITH EVERY OPTION AVAILABLE. TESTER CARS COME EQUIPPED WITH EVERYTHING. PERFORMANCE PACKAGE WITH BASIC EVERYTHING ELSE MAKES THE 2015 ONLY 10LBS HEAVIER THAN A STRIPPED DOWN PERFORMANCE PACKAGE 2014. ON TOP OF THAT THERE WAS A HP GAIN.
Diondon
Thanks to the lawyers uh, I marbled the foyer
The thing is, Ford severely gimps the V6 version compared to the V8. Not just in engine size but mad features too.
Nobody care about the v6
THE V8 IS DETUNED WAY MORE. THEY GIMPED THE V8 FOR MPG BUT THAT HURTS THE V6 BECAUSE GIVING IT ECO BOOST WOULD PUT IT TOO CLOSE TO THE V8. THE 3.5L ECOBOOST WOULD BE AWESOME BUT FORD IS GOING TO PROTECT THE 5.0.
IT WOULD BE BADASS IF THEY WOULD HAVE BROUGHT BACK THE THUNDERBIRD WITH THE 3.5L ECOBOOST OR THE CAPRI OR SOMETHING AND MADE THAT THE 2 SEATER ROADSTER WITH THE 2.3L ECOBOOST.
THEN OPEN THE PERFORMANCE PACKAGE UP TO THE 480ISH HP THE ENGINE CAN REALLY PUT OUT. AND OPEN UP THAT QUIET ASS EXHAUST. CAMAROS AND CHALLENGERS JUST SWALLOW IT UP AT THE LIGHT.
Ricky Church
Stole Timberlake's Spaceship-Coupe
I was watching a "first drive" video today about this, and I was confused as hell at the numbers.
I guess they figure with all the aftermarket/factory shops tuning Mustangs, If people want more power from their V8's, they can always jump into a Roush, Saleen, or Shelby.
I have a strong feeling the official Shelby version for this model is gonna bring some God-like numbers.