Health-Law Employer Mandate Delayed by U.S. Until 2015

Chris.B

Banned
Joined
Jun 22, 2012
Messages
18,921
Reputation
-4,646
Daps
21,895
Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, a Kentucky Republican, said in an e-mailed statement that the delay confirms his party’s argument that “Obamacare costs too much and it isn’t working the way the administration promised.”

The 2010 Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act allows the Obama administration to set the starting date for the employer coverage reporting requirement that’s the linchpin of the mandate. The administration had not yet announced a date, one of the officials said. Still, enforcement of the mandate had been widely expected to begin in 2014, the official said.
Business Groups

The White House had been in discussions with business groups over complaints about the reporting requirements, and senior officials believe they can simplify the process, the officials said. The administration plans to invite employer groups to discuss ways of simplifying administrative burdens created by the mandate, the officials said.

Most large employers already provide coverage that meets the law’s requirements, the officials said.

The officials said the decision stemmed from a commitment in the administration to reduce regulatory red tape as much as possible and drew parallels to a move earlier this year to cut the length of application forms for insurance provided through government-sponsored exchanges to three pages from 21.

Neil Trautwein, vice president and employee benefits counsel for the National Retail Federation, called the move “an unexpected but extraordinarily wise decision.”

The decision could lead companies to delay their own decisions on whether to offer coverage to all their workers, Trautwein said.

“The administration is certainly encouraging employers to continue and expand offerings,” he said. “We’ll see how that goes.”

To contact the reporters on this story: Mike Dorning in Washington at mdorning@bloomberg.net; Alex Wayne in Washington at awayne3@bloomberg.net

Health-Law Employer Mandate Delayed by U.S. Until 2015 - Bloomberg

Liberalism = mental disorder....this healthcare law is a disaster waiting to happen.

Young people will not buy insurance because they don't need it and will take the fine instead.

Without young people buying into it this program is DOA...Employers will take fine than implement this crazy law.
My goodness I hate liberals...
 

newworldafro

DeeperThanRapBiggerThanHH
Joined
May 3, 2012
Messages
51,421
Reputation
5,293
Daps
115,975
Reppin
In the Silver Lining
hmmm

[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5VBzWHTMHvs"]Houston Area Doctor's Office Closing Its Doors on Account of the ACA - YouTube[/ame]


Correct me if I"m wrong, but my understanding is that part of the Act will work something like this scenario:

Say you are in your doctors office right??? The doctor will look at your condition and type in the condition/illness into a electronic device, and a bureaucrat somewhere or either default computer program will send back to the doctor how to treat/care for the patient. If the doctor does not do what the electronic device says, and goes on his own, he will be fined I think $50K or either $100K or something like that the first time. The 2nd time he doesn't comply with the electronic device's order on how to treat a patient, he/she will be arrested.

^^^ Now I've been hearing this from various sources over the past year. I can show videos of medical doctors saying just what I typed. Have yall heard the same or you can contradict what I typed??? :patrice: Let me know if you want to see the videos?
 

Meta Reign

I walk the streets like, ''say something, n!gga!''
Joined
Jun 9, 2012
Messages
3,224
Reputation
-3,596
Daps
6,601
Reppin
Franklin ave.
:pachaha:

I'm not even surprised though. It's too big, too expensive, too complicated. . . And just all around hated by most intelligent people.

I think it's going to just be ignored even after it's "implemented". Atleast until it's turned into a direct tax that comes out of people's check after they choose which insurance corporation they want to use.
 

profound

technique
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
5,224
Reputation
985
Daps
5,768
question - my boss said i gotta get health insurance by 2014 or i will be fined. does this news mean i dont need it until 2015?
 

Chris.B

Banned
Joined
Jun 22, 2012
Messages
18,921
Reputation
-4,646
Daps
21,895
question - my boss said i gotta get health insurance by 2014 or i will be fined. does this news mean i dont need it until 2015?

your boss has decided to pay the fine that participate....most employers will do the same.
 

Demon

Evil b*stard
Joined
Aug 12, 2012
Messages
6,382
Reputation
749
Daps
9,394
Reppin
Hell on Earth
Never in my adult life did I ever contemplate someday I would be forced to buy something or get fined :what:

Obama is a fukking smooth talking scum bag :snoop:

I never even cared to get health insurance because I don't get sick and Im not clumsy :wtf: If I need medical attention, I'd pay out of pocket instead of getting money deducted from my check, because that type of shyt is so rare and infrequent to me.

I could care less who doesn't have healthcare either. Not my fukking problem.

fukk this cac c00n mulatto scum Obama and his healthcare plan

:obama:
 

Rawtid

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Jun 23, 2012
Messages
43,323
Reputation
14,688
Daps
119,480
I think everyone should be required to get physical examinations and bloodwork (disease testing) at least once a year but you don't need health insurance to do that. The whole "healthcare for everyone" seems like a good idea in theory but in practice it's a mess.

There are a few hospitals here that have advertised examinations and blood work for like $50 or something. No insurance required or anything like that. I like that idea better than forcing people to get coverage.
 

Chris.B

Banned
Joined
Jun 22, 2012
Messages
18,921
Reputation
-4,646
Daps
21,895
Gotta try and mitigate any damage the ACA will cause Dems in 2014.
Even though the Republicans seem incapable of winning a game of "Rock Paper Scissors" at this point in time but who knows what can happen in a years time.

Why not repeal it? :jada:
That will save the Dems the heartache which will ensure in 2016.

Trust me when people get hit with fines the backlash will be the biggest we would have seen in American politics.

Even the democrats in blue states are not safe from this.
 

Jello Biafra

A true friend stabs you in the front
Supporter
Joined
May 16, 2012
Messages
46,184
Reputation
4,958
Daps
120,921
Reppin
Behind You
Why not repeal it? :jada:
That will save the Dems the heartache which will ensure in 2016.

Trust me when people get hit with fines the backlash will be the biggest we would have seen in American politics.

Even the democrats in blue states are not safe from this.

It won't get repealed because it is the signature piece of legislation from Obama and it is what he will be hanging his hat on as one of his two biggest accomplishments (the other being "getting" Bin Laden) as president.
No one in the ruling class of the Democratic Party cares about the nuts and bolts of the bill just that it was passed while a Dem was in office.
 

¯\_(ツ)_/¯

Superstar
Joined
Aug 14, 2012
Messages
6,495
Reputation
127
Daps
15,807
The stupidity in this thread is blowing this way out of monumental proportions.

Because a certain provision as delayed it means it will be a failure???

:what:

@BarNone you sure this @Chris.B kid ain't a troll???
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Top