Birnin Zana
Honorary Wakandan
Obama telling the dems to rally around Hillary isn't too surprising. But comparing Bernie to Bush?
Wow...
Did you see the video?Brehs, I know you don't like the Clintons but this is disingenuous. It's not what he meant and the examiner is a right wing paper. Disregard this stuff.
again, we would have never known who obama was if it wasnt for wallstreet along with the small donation doners giving his campaign the funding he needed to defeat hillary.Obama telling the dems to rally around Hillary isn't too surprising. But comparing Bernie to Bush?
Wow...
How in the fukk did you draw THAT conclusion to all of that? If you had read any of my other statements in this thread, you would've seen exactly why I consider Obama to be Bill's illegitimate son, who is failing at being an overachiever.
Take things out of context then look stupid with the ad homonems brehs.... The short of that, if you bothered to read, was Obama gave up trying to be his own man within the first year or two of his presidency, and brought in the full Clinton team pretty much.
Clinton had a lot of successes, for his time after Bush. He was still able to raise taxes and improve the economy. He had his own terror crisis without have in to blow up the Middle East, and the little shot he did got a movie made from it. Wag the Dog anyone. The Clinton's corrupt banker ties played them in the end, as well as his callous American White liberal disregard for the ACTUAL problems of African Americans and crime.
It's hard to blame him for that, as we were kissing his ass too. We still criticized him because, and only because, he was White. If Obama had done half the shyt as Bill Clinton, when be had even more acrimony in Congress (impeachment is not joke and he still didn't act like the lame duck Obama did starting last year), Obama would have likely been the GOAT president.
Obama's a p*ssy, and doesn't live up to "dad". Now, don't get this twisted and feel I'm putting Bill on some kind of pedestal. That's why you really need to read other posts before calling people trolls and shyt. Many people here know how I feel about both the Clinton's and Obama, so it's kinda weird that you're over here trying to rain ether like this is the Coliseum, just because you disagreed. It's HL for a reason.
Both presidents were fukk ups, but i can say that Bill tried harder and left us with a Senate majority in the end. I don't think Obama would be able to say the same how this shyt is turning out.




i'll make one correction, he created the blue dogs and was one himself.-Obama attempts at creating a precedence of hiring cabinet members who had no lobby ties failed miserably. So that shows how corrupt Washington is. Thus the hiring of old Clinton folks, which came about via the compromise of the 2008 election when Hillary and Bill was salty for losing
-Bill Clinton pushed for global economy at the expense of domestic industries and borders
-Bill failed at establishing national health program, which Obama delivered on
-Bill Clinton did not have to deal with "Blue dog democrats," while having control of both houses. Matter of fact, the Republicans gained control of congress under his watch
-Obama improved an economy that was on the brink of collapsing into a depression. What kind of economy did Bill inherit from Bush?
-Bill Clinton did not intervene in Rwanda, but did intervene in the Balkans
-Bill Clinton applied the same tactics by Reagan by appealing to welfare reform due to irresponsible black folks and law/order toughing due to irresponsible black folks
duly noted, I did not know that.i'll make one correction, he created the blue dogs and was one himself.
After thinking about it, I honestly believe he was referring to republicans saying 'No' to everything the last 8 years. I'm not naive, they are going to eventually distance themselves a bit from Obama but this is too soon in the campaign and way too blunt.Brehs, I know you don't like the Clintons but this is disingenuous. It's not what he meant and the examiner is a right wing paper. Disregard this stuff. I think he is being taken out of context @dtownreppin214
in clinton's time it was the DLC. see after the reagan beat down in '84 democratic governors, mainly in the south like himself felt the party needed to move to the right to stay relevant. the dlc created the blue dogs.duly noted, I did not know that.
And Bill Clinton did what again? besides nutting on a fat jew girl's dress....?I will try to explain this. I don't think Bill misspoke, but I feel he believes Obama has been a p*ssy, or he allowed the real rise of the GOP again, which isn't what a president is supposed to do.
Bill was telling the truth, but liberals pretend this is all some little gang of friends. Obama likely leaned on Bill, Hill, Rahm, Axelrod, Lawrence Summers, and the rest of the Clinton clan like a little fukking kid.....and still was a failure in making the party stronger.
And when you're a failure, with all your dad's toys, your dad will never respect you. Obama is a complete, utter....amazing failure. His only good outcomes have been the Iran deal, killing Osama, maybe ACA (that took 6 years into his term to finally start), and the economy or stock market didn't crash. The country, but in rebellion, is deeply right locally and nationally.