Here's 21 Jokes That Only The Smart, Sophisticated ,Intellectual Coli Members Will Understand!!!

L&HH

Veteran
Joined
May 18, 2012
Messages
53,759
Reputation
5,910
Daps
162,945
Reppin
PG x MD
I got most. And didn't really find them funny.

Somebody explain the entropy one? Is it related to the picture or nah?

Actually I think I get it. Entropy is random disorder, so it will never be what it ''used to be"
 

Dafunkdoc_Unlimited

Theological Noncognitivist Since Birth
Joined
Jul 25, 2012
Messages
45,062
Reputation
8,040
Daps
122,411
Reppin
The Wrong Side of the Tracks
L&HH said:
I got most. And didn't really find them funny.

Somebody explain the entropy one? Is it related to the picture or nah?

Actually I think I get it. Entropy is random disorder, so it will never be what it ''used to be"

Entropy progresses to equilibrium-over-time......at least in thermodynamics.

:yeshrug:
 

L&HH

Veteran
Joined
May 18, 2012
Messages
53,759
Reputation
5,910
Daps
162,945
Reppin
PG x MD
The 3 logicians in a bar one is funny to me because I literally just read a similar riddle 20min before this thread:

A group of people with assorted eye colors live on an island. They are all perfect logicians -- if a conclusion can be logically deduced, they will do it instantly. No one knows the color of their eyes. Every night at midnight, a ferry stops at the island. Any islanders who have figured out the color of their own eyes then leave the island, and the rest stay. Everyone can see everyone else at all times and keeps a count of the number of people they see with each eye color (excluding themselves), but they cannot otherwise communicate. Everyone on the island knows all the rules in this paragraph.

On this island there are 100 blue-eyed people, 100 brown-eyed people, and the Guru (she happens to have green eyes). So any given blue-eyed person can see 100 people with brown eyes and 99 people with blue eyes (and one with green), but that does not tell him his own eye color; as far as he knows the totals could be 101 brown and 99 blue. Or 100 brown, 99 blue, and he could have red eyes.

The Guru is allowed to speak once (let's say at noon), on one day in all their endless years on the island. Standing before the islanders, she says the following:

"I can see someone who has blue eyes."

Who leaves the island, and on what night?

There are no mirrors or reflecting surfaces, nothing dumb. It is not a trick question, and the answer is logical. It doesn't depend on tricky wording or anyone lying or guessing, and it doesn't involve people doing something silly like creating a sign language or doing genetics. The Guru is not making eye contact with anyone in particular; she's simply saying "I count at least one blue-eyed person on this island who isn't me."
 

Dafunkdoc_Unlimited

Theological Noncognitivist Since Birth
Joined
Jul 25, 2012
Messages
45,062
Reputation
8,040
Daps
122,411
Reppin
The Wrong Side of the Tracks
Napoleon said:
I understood all of those sans the logic in the bar one:wow:

The first two don't know if EVERYONE wanted a beer, but couldn't answer 'No' since they didn't know if anyone besides themselves did. So, answering 'I don't know' indicates that they (individually) DID want one.

The last one figured out what the first two really meant, so, since he actually did want another, answered 'Yes' since they ALL did want another beer.

Yeah, I know it's stupid and counterintuitive.
 

L&HH

Veteran
Joined
May 18, 2012
Messages
53,759
Reputation
5,910
Daps
162,945
Reppin
PG x MD
I understood all of those sans the logic in the bar one:wow:

As a logician they answer the question absolutely as in yes or no. Kind of like the is it a boy or girl question. Yes is correct because the baby has to be either a boy or a girl. But in the bar example the question is "Do you ALL want a drink"? The first person wants a drink but has no information if the others do so they say I don't know. The second person wants a drink but doesn't know if the third does so they say I don't know. Now the third person knows the other two want a drink because if either of the previous two did not want a drink they would have answered no instead of idk, since the third wants a drink as well and knows the other two do, then they can answer YES to the question. "Do you ALL want a drink"
 

L&HH

Veteran
Joined
May 18, 2012
Messages
53,759
Reputation
5,910
Daps
162,945
Reppin
PG x MD
The first two don't know if EVERYONE wanted a beer, but couldn't answer 'No' since they didn't know if anyone besides themselves did. So, answering 'I don't know' indicates that they (individually) DID want one.

The last one figured out what the first two really meant, so, since he actually did want another, answered 'Yes' since they ALL did want another beer.

Yeah, I know it's stupid and counterintuitive.
I think you kind of have it wrong. The first two can in fact answer NO if they themselves don't want a drink. If one person, including themselves out of the group doesn't want a drink the answer to the question would be "NO, we do not ALL want a drink", because they themselves don't want one.
 

L&HH

Veteran
Joined
May 18, 2012
Messages
53,759
Reputation
5,910
Daps
162,945
Reppin
PG x MD
I just thought of a better way to tell that bar "joke" in the form of a riddle.

The bartender asks the three patrons whom are all logicians "do any of you want a drink"

Person 1 responds with "I don't know"

Person 2 responds with "yes"

Person 3 responds with "yes"

Who should the bartender pour a drink for? person 1, person 2, person 3, or all of them

actually this one is a little ambiguous and could have two answers :patrice:
 

Dafunkdoc_Unlimited

Theological Noncognitivist Since Birth
Joined
Jul 25, 2012
Messages
45,062
Reputation
8,040
Daps
122,411
Reppin
The Wrong Side of the Tracks
L&HH said:
I think you kind of have it wrong. The first two can in fact answer NO if they themselves don't want a drink. If one person, including themselves out of the group doesn't want a drink the answer to the question would be "NO, we do not ALL want a drink", because they themselves don't want one.

Yeah, but if they themselves don't want another, that still doesn't allow them to answer 'No' for ALL of them since one of the others could want another.​
 
Top