↓R↑LYB
I trained Sheng Long and Shonuff
I didn't dismiss it. I asked him the question, he answered, and I dapped his post.
I only asked him because sometimes while people are searching for truth, meaning, or identity, they tend to gravitate toward books, docs, music ideologies, etc.--external sources that validate things they find solace in believing, or give them some confirmation bias.
Your comment about docs being the primary source of knowledge over books for this ADD generation is probably true, but it's unfortunate. There's plenty of bullshyt in books, but it's much easier for filmmakers to let it fly in films, and they appeal to peoples' emotion through entertainment. For example HC is full of factual inaccuracies and pseudoscientific, ahistorical bullshyt, but you can look no further than this site to see people sweeping that under the rug because HC gives them emotional high, and they've vested parts of their identity into. Some of these kids here will go to the extent that they will insult people and label people "c00ns/cacs" or whatever just because they point out the falsehoods in HC and don't see Mr. Nasheed as a credible source of academic discussion.
Zeitgeist is another bullshyt documentary that developed a mini-following of young naive people a few years back. Different ideological niches have their own slanted, poorly-sourced emotional appeal-driven documentaries and media sources that validate for them shyt they want to believe.
So the question is are people who digesting lowbrow, falsehood-tainted propaganda from kooks and charlatans like HC, or Zeitgeist, or Alex Jones films, or that Waco doc, or what have you a good thing for society and peoples' lives overall--are the negatives of heads being filled with false information that could potentially handicaps one's growth just a necessary cost of being a catalyst for positivity.
I would say no. shyt like HC just makes people feel good imo. It doubt it bears fruit in terms of making an appreciable difference in anyone's living situation. It's like going to church...an emotional fix.
Regarding knowledge of self or whatever, it's a misconception that black people somehow need a self-esteem boost. Black people have no shortage of self-esteem. We need practical solutions for economic, educational, and political growth and expansion, not touchy-feely ego-steroid s bullshyt about melanin having super-powered and Olmecs being black.
People absorb this shyt like it's a drug. Tariq Nasheed is a joke of a thinker, he's obviously a clear charlatan and a capitalist opportunist. His Isis Papers and afrocentric kook-inspired pseudohistory holds no weight factually, all that melanin nonsense is the perverse twin of 19th century cac racial pseudoscience, his critiques of black feminism are generally strawmen that highlight anecdotes and the worst extremes. And the stuff he says that is true about African history, systemic racism, etc. can be easily accessed without all the rest of the bullshyt or a charlatan like Nasheed playing middleman/cult leader.
Dude has a cult following, if you judge by this board. I don't even read TLR much there seems to be a new Tariq dikk-swallowing thread every time I browse here. It's not even about the knowledge or potential positivity. It's just a circle jerk of weak-minded, intellectually-lazy impressionable dudes dikkriding, waving pom-poms, and retreating to their ideological enclaves where they can stroke their own egos through groupthink and toss grenades in defense of their self-validating worldview.
I do sincerely hope that this Nasheed/Sotomayor/Umar Johnson or whoever else black Glenn Beck shockjock and flimsy ideology stanning is just a stepping stone to a greater level of understanding and growth. I don't see it though. Most people generally just gravitate toward makes them feel good and confirms their biases and stubbornly and aggressively cling there.
That's a long ass post breh, fukk wrong with you
