Hey Nicole. An Open Challenge.

[Gil Scott-Heroin]

This dude is geeking -

I don’t think he went to sleep since yesterday morning

Alerts​

1. Gil Scott-Heroin quoted your post in the thread Hey Nicole. An Open Challenge..
   14 minutes ago
2. Gil Scott-Heroin mentioned you in a post in the thread Hey Nicole. An Open Challenge..
   16 minutes ago
3. 
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   

You quoted/tagged me about 100x yesterday, even going back to edit all your posts to add more lies after I had already responded, trying to sneak in more shyt to give off the appearance I didn't respond to some of your statements. Nasty behavior.

This is like when you were trying to shame me for my posting habits, when you literally have a higher post rate than me.

Are you okay?

 

[Reflected]

Who said anything about justification?

As I said - a taste of his own medicine.

My approach to this would be completely different if @Nicole0416_718_929_646212 contested my position in a civil manner, but he didn't. There's a reason why he's created more enemies on this board for himself than anyone else.

I read the first part, we can just drop that because I'm not seeing the contradiction, like honestly, I'm not. But you might have different intentions, which would make sense.


On the quoted:

Bro, everything you do, morality wise, requires justification. It's exactly why you have no justification for what you are doing, at least not officially, you are indirectly justifying your behavior by suggesting she did it first. But think about it, would you say one is justified in acting in a manner they would consider immoral simply because their interlocutor has done it to them? If you answer "yes, one is justified", then you are literally justifying "eye for an eye", which I'm sure you don't agree with. And if you don't, then you are in contradiction right now and you are also acting in an immoral manner, entirely unjustified. What ground do you have to stand on if you can't even check yourself when in contradiction? That is the work of a sophist.

 

[Gil Scott-Heroin]

This circus clown @Nicole0416_718_929_646212 gets dragged up and down for spamming threads with incessant quoting and tagging, and is now in here trying to shame someone for behavior she's guilty of, for what is the millionth time.

Have you no self-awareness?

 

[Reflected]

breh you need to get on that 50 posts per page life

Bruh, if I wanted to cook my computer, I could start mining bitcoins. But seriously, I keep it short because when someone starts posting annoying/weird images, videos with autoplay, or something I don't care for gets spammed, I can just skip whole pages as opposed to almost endlessly scrolling past it. And also with the amount of tabs I don't close, that shyt would actually kill my computer, and I'm 32GB RAM.

 

[Nicole0416_718_929_646212]

I’m not trying to be funny but this is really concerning -

I’ve only replied to him directly once today - purposely watching 9 pages of him in my alerts to see how long he would keep this up

Dude is about to catch a stroke or heart attack at this rate

7:48 AM YESTERDAYYY

The ramblings of an unemployed underemployed basement dweller incel. Go outside and touch grass, my guy. This ain’t healthy. I could see if you actually had some shyt to expose then I could respect the time/effort but you literally just talked yourself into a repeat cycle for 24 hours. Seeing how long you’ve posted back to back since 7:48am is giving me second-hand stress.

 

[Theodoresolderbreh]

. Shudder need to bring back tales from the darkside.

That show was fire.

 

[Thavoiceofthevoiceless]

Bruh, if I wanted to cook my computer, I could start mining bitcoins. But seriously, I keep it short because when someone starts posting annoying/weird images, videos with autoplay, or something I don't care for gets spammed, I can just skip whole pages as opposed to almost endlessly scrolling past it. And also with the amount of tabs I don't close, that shyt would actually kill my computer, and I'm 32GB RAM.

Looks like someone forgot to switch accounts

 

[Nicole0416_718_929_646212]

And he’s still going

Alerts​

1. [IMG alt="Gil Scott-Heroin"]https://www.thecoli.com/data/avatars/s/0/34.jpg?1603783836[/IMG]
   Gil Scott-Heroin mentioned you in a post in the thread Hey Nicole. An Open Challenge..
   14 minutes ago
2. [IMG alt="Gil Scott-Heroin"]https://www.thecoli.com/data/avatars/s/0/34.jpg?1603783836[/IMG]
   Gil Scott-Heroin quoted your post in the thread Hey Nicole. An Open Challenge..
   17 minutes ago
3. [IMG alt="Gil Scott-Heroin"]https://www.thecoli.com/data/avatars/s/0/34.jpg?1603783836[/IMG]
   Gil Scott-Heroin mentioned you in a post in the thread Hey Nicole. An Open Challenge..
   23 minutes ago
   

 

[Gil Scott-Heroin]

I read the first part, we can just drop that because I'm not seeing the contradiction, like honestly, I'm not. But you might have different intentions, which would make sense.

It's a clear contradiction, whether or not you want to acknowledge so is absolutely none of my concern. Your opinion is irrelevant to me, as there is absolutely no cause for you to have quoted me in the first place.

On the quoted:

Bro, everything you do, morality wise, requires justification. It's exactly why you have no justification for what you are doing, at least not officially, you are indirectly justifying your behavior by suggesting she did it first. But think about it, would you say one is justified in acting in a manner they would consider immoral simply because their interlocutor has done it to them? If you answer "yes, one is justified", then you are literally justifying "eye for an eye", which I'm sure you don't agree with. And if you don't, then you are in contradiction right now and you are also acting in an immoral manner, entirely unjustified. What ground do you have to stand on if you can't even check yourself when in contradiction? That is the work of a sophist.

What is it you're trying to achieve here by injecting yourself into this?

I'm not trying to justify myself, morally or in any other way by attacking @Nicole0416_718_929_646212's character. Why do you keep translating my approach into what you believe is my intention? I'm doing this purely to teach him a lesson, and make an example out of him like he tried to do to me (and everyone else that has the misfortune of having him living in their alerts box).

Call it trolling the troll if you will.

I treat everyone exactly as they treat me.

If I may ask, how old are you, you don't need to say the exact age, but a relevant range will suffice.

 

[Reflected]

Looks like someone forgot to switch accounts

What? I'm speaking in general for people that don't increase the post count, it's usually that or because they just don't know. But I just don't see a reason when it seems to bring on more annoyances than positives.

 

[Nicole0416_718_929_646212]

Looks like someone forgot to switch accounts

Dude brought in his B team to clock in ^^^

With a futile attempt at a save .

Mad that he was told to stfu with the anti black male rhetoric for backing a poster calling black people racist names . Interesting.

https://www.thecoli.com/threads/serious-thread-why-are-male-posters-allowed-to-push-anti-black-female-rhetoric.940382/page-8

Hold up - this @Broke Wave is a nonAA who can refer to black Americans with derogatory racist Somali names that negatively describe black people, calling AAs “jig—-s” for damn near a decade of posts … oh nahhhh. It’s time to get proactive on this shyt- this is becoming a daily thread creation theme.

@Thavoiceofthevoiceless you got next - I see you doing a lot of reacting and cosigning to support a bushed poster subliminally referring to black men/black people as the N-ER word. Bytch ass cohorting with @Gil Scott-Heroin and @Broke Wave which means you must have shady and suspect posts in your past.

 

[Reflected]

Call it trolling the troll if you will.

Ah, so it is unjustified. Like I said, this is sophistry.



And on the first part, no, there is no formal contradiction, else provide the syllogism... But don't worry about that, there is no formal contradiction, I can see how one would think there is a general contradiction though, but I don't personally agree with it.

 

[Gil Scott-Heroin]

The ramblings of an unemployed underemployed basement dweller incel. Go outside and touch grass, my guy. This ain’t healthy. I could see if you actually had some shyt to expose then I could respect the time/effort but you literally just talked yourself into a repeat cycle for 24 hours. Seeing how long you’ve posted back to back since 7:48am is giving me second-hand stress.

Is this some inception shyt that you've embedded in your brain to deal with everyone accusing you of rambling, being unemployed, and posting without pause? Again, how does it escape you that you have a higher post rate than I do? I mean, I can understand this coming from someone that doesn't post as often, but you literally have one of the highest post rates of anyone on this board.

Your bipolar ass was quoting me, begging for my attention, begging for me to keep the same energy, FTF confrontation, and now you resort to this passive aggressive, non-quoting, third-person projection act.

Is this a tactic you employ to deal with the juggling of being a female on the internet, and a male irl?

 

[Nicole0416_718_929_646212]

Concerning … and he continues

Alerts​

1. [IMG alt="Gil Scott-Heroin"]https://www.thecoli.com/data/avatars/s/0/34.jpg?1603783836[/IMG]
   Gil Scott-Heroin quoted your post in the thread Hey Nicole. An Open Challenge..
   3 minutes ago
2. [IMG alt="Gil Scott-Heroin"]https://www.thecoli.com/data/avatars/s/0/34.jpg?1603783836[/IMG]
   Gil Scott-Heroin mentioned you in a post in the thread Hey Nicole. An Open Challenge..
   12 minutes ago
3. [IMG alt="Gil Scott-Heroin"]https://www.thecoli.com/data/avatars/s/0/34.jpg?1603783836[/IMG]
   Gil Scott-Heroin mentioned you in a post in the thread Hey Nicole. An Open Challenge..
   27 minutes ago

 

[Orbital-Fetus]

All of this seems exhausting.