Hey Obama stans : Where's Obama?

Midrash

All Star
Joined
Oct 10, 2013
Messages
2,008
Reputation
970
Daps
6,942
Lmao @ Obama being "another government employee with rules to follow"

So when he murdered an American citizen and his son, what rules was he following? Anyway just pertaining to black people we can see :

1. Private Prisons with quotas hurting the black community

2. Predatory lending by the bankers in black neighborhoods

3. Massive black unemployment

4. Detroit not having running water in many parts (I know you think this is a good thing)

@Detroit Wave as a Detroiter, how do you feel about the man in charge allowing Detroit, a majority black city, have entire sections without RUNNING WATER??? He did not even speak on it. He could easily use eminent domain to solve that problem, or FEMA, or an executive order, but he sat on his hands. How does that effect your view of him?


Why haven't you held the local officials responsible for something that they were elected to take care of in the first place. You know? Mayors, Governors, etc. Chain of command is not a pyramid scheme like Wake Up Now, it's actually there to serve a specific purpose. It's actually in place so shyt gets streamlined and the president can focus on doing presidential shyt instead of reacting to every little instance of trouble that pops up because the officials under him won't do their job.
:mjlol:
 

☑︎#VoteDemocrat

The Original
Bushed
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
Dec 9, 2012
Messages
338,367
Reputation
-35,043
Daps
641,696
Reppin
The Deep State
I see, so because he hated the United States (not illegal) and you think he would kill you without hesitation (no evidence he killed anyone or even threatened to), the government can kill him without a trial and violate at least 3 amendments to the constitution, the highest law of the land? What's stopping them from killing anyone else on Earth? If they had good reason to believe he was a terrorist, they could have already went to judge and presented at least some evidence. They refused to do so. The only person between Al Awlaki and Obama who has killed innocent people with no remorse is Obama, who also had his 16 year old son killed.

@BarNone once again your defense of Obama is half about Obama, and half about me :mjlol:

Is it hyperbole that Obama kills American citizens? Is it hyperbole that Obama justice department didn't prosecute the bankers for crimes that they know they committed such as robosigning? Is it hyperbole that Obama's drone war targets people that they don't even know are terrorists, but simply military aged males? Do they or do they not do double tap strikes where they bomb a site, then bomb the first responders who come to help?

@Mephistopheles come get your boy :mjlol:

Why was Al-Awalaki killed?
 

☑︎#VoteDemocrat

The Original
Bushed
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
Dec 9, 2012
Messages
338,367
Reputation
-35,043
Daps
641,696
Reppin
The Deep State
And he killed Gaddafi.
reGWCS7.png
 

Broke Wave

The GOAT
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
18,704
Reputation
4,580
Daps
44,606
Reppin
Open Society Foundation
Why haven't you held the local officials responsible for something that they were elected to take care of in the first place. You know? Mayors, Governors, etc. Chain of command is not a pyramid scheme like Wake Up Now, it's actually there to serve a specific purpose. It's actually in place so shyt gets streamlined and the president can focus on doing presidential shyt instead of reacting to every little instance of trouble that pops up because the officials under him won't do their job.
:mjlol:

The chain of command, huh? :mjlol:

First of all, wake up now is not a pyramid scheme, but residual income and financial freedom.

Meanwhile, in Washington http://www.nytimes.com/2014/08/13/u...sens-ban-on-lobbyists-in-government.html?_r=0

@BarNone that's change we can believe in
 

Broke Wave

The GOAT
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
18,704
Reputation
4,580
Daps
44,606
Reppin
Open Society Foundation
Why was Al-Awalaki killed?

Because the Pentagon controls the White House. They had actionable intelligence on his location and felt that he had to die as counter propaganda, as he was sending propaganda against the West for local AQ affiliates, of course totally allegedly. The Pentagon felt that it would be a military victory to kill a propagandist while he felt he was safe in his own home. Then they killed his son because apparently he was on the bus with some kind of other AQAP leader but it was really a school bus. They completely and totally violated the constitution as it stands and refuse to even disclose their rational as to why they killed him, so they are totally unaccountable.
 

☑︎#VoteDemocrat

The Original
Bushed
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
Dec 9, 2012
Messages
338,367
Reputation
-35,043
Daps
641,696
Reppin
The Deep State
Because the Pentagon controls the White House. They had actionable intelligence on his location and felt that he had to die as counter propaganda, as he was sending propaganda against the West for local AQ affiliates, of course totally allegedly. The Pentagon felt that it would be a military victory to kill a propagandist while he felt he was safe in his own home. Then they killed his son because apparently he was on the bus with some kind of other AQAP leader but it was really a school bus. They completely and totally violated the constitution as it stands and refuse to even disclose their rational as to why they killed him, so they are totally unaccountable.

so why was Al-Awalaki tried In Absentia and found guilty in Yemen? :lupe:
 

Broke Wave

The GOAT
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
18,704
Reputation
4,580
Daps
44,606
Reppin
Open Society Foundation
so why was Al-Awalaki tried In Absentia and found guilty in Yemen? :lupe:

You moron, that is totally inconsequential as to why AMERICA killed him. Simply because you're found guilty in the kangaroo court of Yemen, you do not give up your rights as an American citizen. If the Yemeni's wanted to kill him, it wouldn't be against their constitution but since America killed him and his son, it was against yours. By that logic, Yemen could sentence dissidents to death and America could kill them and it would be totally alright. Yemen could sentence me to death and I could die. Saudi could sentence you to death for blasphemy. See how flimsy this logic is?
 

☑︎#VoteDemocrat

The Original
Bushed
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
Dec 9, 2012
Messages
338,367
Reputation
-35,043
Daps
641,696
Reppin
The Deep State
You moron, that is totally inconsequential as to why AMERICA killed him. Simply because you're found guilty in the kangaroo court of Yemen, you do not give up your rights as an American citizen. If the Yemeni's wanted to kill him, it wouldn't be against their constitution but since America killed him and his son, it was against yours. By that logic, Yemen could sentence dissidents to death and America could kill them and it would be totally alright. Yemen could sentence me to death and I could die. Saudi could sentence you to death for blasphemy. See how flimsy this logic is?
I'm ok with the bending of the rules to take that fukker out.

Get mad if you want to. Since you want to keep harping on this "American" shyt as if it matters.

We'd have murked John Walker Lindh (remember that name?) too if we didn't get our hands on him first.

If you renounce your citizenship and make threats against the USA, AND align with a sworn enemy of the USA, then you don't get much of a say in what happens to you.
 
Top