Higher Learning Has Been Hijacked

Shogun

Veteran
Joined
May 3, 2012
Messages
25,584
Reputation
6,087
Daps
63,269
Reppin
Knicks
Posters is mad....:laff:

Objectivity is name of the game. If you can't call out someone that represents your side of the spectrum for fukkery, then you are the "wing nut"........ :coffee:

None of these politicians are infallible. Objectivity is the cure for being a "wing nut".....
tumblr_m7cixoDWW71qc8jh0o3_500.gif
 

J-Nice

A genius is the one most like himself
Supporter
Joined
Aug 5, 2013
Messages
3,630
Reputation
3,190
Daps
12,252
I post occasionally in higher learning but I lurk more than anything. I don't see anything wrong with debating and discussing opposing viewpoints, but it seems as though alot of people who bring up that argument in this section post borderline dumb shyt and don't bring anything new or worthwhile to the discussion to think about. And let's be honest, most people debate or argue to be right. People rarely change their stances no matter if the stance their taking is right or wrong.
 

Dusty Bake Activate

Fukk your corny debates
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
39,077
Reputation
6,067
Daps
132,846
Julian Assange's statements IS strong evidence whether you personally want to admit to it, or if you personally "like" assange or not.

this is why his simple statement has made the news around the world. the man has influence - this is just reality.

No it isn't strong evidence or any evidence at all. Assange didn't say dude was the leaker. He's slick-talking and fanning the flames of conspiracy with insinuation.

better question though: what evidence exists to suggest that Seth Rich's murder was NOT connected to the DNC? serious question. :jbhmm:
No, that's a stupid question. You can't disprove a negative. If there is any evidence that emerges that dude was the leaker and was killed by the Democratic party or Hillary then it will taken into consideration. All we know now is one guy out of the I don't know how many people who work for the DNC was killed...while walking outside in the dark at 4 am...in an area with a lot of robberies.
 

Booker T Garvey

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Aug 17, 2014
Messages
29,780
Reputation
4,007
Daps
124,322
No it isn't strong evidence or any evidence at all. Assange didn't say dude was the leaker. He's slick-talking and fanning the flames of conspiracy with insinuation.


No, that's a stupid question. You can't disprove a negative. If there is any evidence that emerges that dude was the leaker and was killed by the Democratic party or Hillary then it will taken into consideration. All we know now is one guy out of the I don't know how many people who work for the DNC was killed...while walking outside in the dark at 4 am...in an area with a lot of robberies.

th


a normal looking white guy who works for the DNC is murdered in an affluent neighborhood
they don't take his money, phone, car, clothes - nothing.
RIGHT after wikileaks released clintons emails and numerous high ranking officials resign

the head of wikileaks insinuates that the dead DNC staffer was one of his leaks
yet this is not strong evidence at all that this was an inside job by the DNC.

and any question surrounding this story is "a stupid question"

c'mon man. you're insulting your OWN intelligence with this shyt.
 

ⒶⓁⒾⒶⓈ

Doctors without Labcoats
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
7,180
Reputation
-2,215
Daps
14,762
Reppin
Payments accepted Obamacare,paypal and livestock
th


a normal looking white guy who works for the DNC is murdered in an affluent neighborhood
they don't take his money, phone, car, clothes - nothing.
RIGHT after wikileaks released clintons emails and numerous high ranking officials resign

the head of wikileaks insinuates that the dead DNC staffer was one of his leaks
yet this is not strong evidence at all that this was an inside job by the DNC.

and any question surrounding this story is "a stupid question"

c'mon man. you're insulting your OWN intelligence with this shyt.
:dead: nice touch with the lemur
 

Scoop

All Star
Joined
Jun 17, 2012
Messages
6,139
Reputation
-2,680
Daps
9,777
You must have problems functioning in the real world if you think HL is bad.

There's diversity of opinion here but everyone is cordial 90% of the time.
 

Dusty Bake Activate

Fukk your corny debates
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
39,077
Reputation
6,067
Daps
132,846
th


a normal looking white guy who works for the DNC is murdered in an affluent neighborhood
they don't take his money, phone, car, clothes - nothing.
RIGHT after wikileaks released clintons emails and numerous high ranking officials resign

the head of wikileaks insinuates that the dead DNC staffer was one of his leaks
yet this is not strong evidence at all that this was an inside job by the DNC.

and any question surrounding this story is "a stupid question"

c'mon man. you're insulting your OWN intelligence with this shyt.

I didn't say it was a stupid question to ask questions. I said it's a stupid question to ask what evidence is there that he wasn't killed. That's illogical, and a tired trick conspiracy theorists always try to pull: making a baseless assertion providing no evidence, then demanding someone disprove that baseless assertion when it can't be disproven. The onus is on you to support your claim with evidence.

And no, that is not strong evidence. That is not evidence, period. It's not even circumstantial evidence. Nothing.

Watch this:

"thatdude901 is a child molester."

Is that evidence to you?

Assange talking shyt means nothing without receipts. He's doing a disservice to his reputation as an exposer of truth with this trolling insinuation nonsense. If he produced evidence that dude was the leaker, we'd believe him. But he won't do it. He says he wants to protect his sources and won't reveal them, but dude is already dead so what's the problem? Why suggest it without coming out and saying it? With no evidence, I have to chalk it up to his ego, thirst for attention, and well-documented grudge against Hillary Clinton.

There is zero evidence that the guy killed was the leaker. I don't know how many people work at the DNC, but it's safe to say it's a lot. It's not 5 people manning an office. Someone getting killed on the streets of Washington D.C. after dark who happens to work at the DNC isn't some crazy statistical outlier.

Regarding the "affluent area," someone close to me lives in NW D.C. and while it has it's affluent parts, they're never too far from street shyt. And there was a string of recent robberies and carjackings in the area. DNC employee fatally shot in Bloomingdale

And regarding why nothing was stolen from him, I don't know. Maybe he fought back and dude shot him and ran. I wasn't there. But think about what you're saying. Nothing was stolen from him so that means...it was a political assassination made to look like a robbery? That makes no sense. :heh: Wouldn't these professional assassins do their due diligence to cover it and make it look like a robbery? That seems like amateur hour coming from Hillary Clinton's elite team of covert ninja assassins. It's like when dumb ass right wing conspiracy theorists who think Obama had Antonin Scalia killed were like, "Why was a pillow over his head?" Wouldn't professional assassins NOT leave a pillow over his head?


So then why didn't they actually rob him? Nothing was taken from him. :patrice:
See the above paragraph.
 

Booker T Garvey

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Aug 17, 2014
Messages
29,780
Reputation
4,007
Daps
124,322
I didn't say it was a stupid question to ask questions. I said it's a stupid question to ask what evidence is there that he wasn't killed. That's illogical, and a tired trick conspiracy theorists always try to pull: making a baseless assertion providing no evidence, then demanding someone disprove that baseless assertion when it can't be disproven. The onus is on you to support your claim with evidence.

And no, that is not strong evidence. That is not evidence, period. It's not even circumstantial evidence. Nothing.

Watch this:

"thatdude901 is a child molester."

Is that evidence to you?

Assange talking shyt means nothing without receipts. He's doing a disservice to his reputation as an exposer of truth with this trolling insinuation nonsense. If he produced evidence that dude was the leaker, we'd believe him. But he won't do it. He says he wants to protect his sources and won't reveal them, but dude is already dead so what's the problem? Why suggest it without coming out and saying it? With no evidence, I have to chalk it up to his ego, thirst for attention, and well-documented grudge against Hillary Clinton.

There is zero evidence that the guy killed was the leaker. I don't know how many people work at the DNC, but it's safe to say it's a lot. It's not 5 people manning an office. Someone getting killed on the streets of Washington D.C. after dark who happens to work at the DNC isn't some crazy statistical outlier.

Regarding the "affluent area," someone close to me lives in NW D.C. and while it has it's affluent parts, they're never too far from street shyt. And there was a string of recent robberies and carjackings in the area. DNC employee fatally shot in Bloomingdale

And regarding why nothing was stolen from him, I don't know. Maybe he fought back and dude shot him and ran. I wasn't there. But think about what you're saying. Nothing was stolen from him so that means...it was a political assassination made to look like a robbery? That makes no sense. :heh: Wouldn't these professional assassins do their due diligence to cover it and make it look like a robbery? That seems like amateur hour coming from Hillary Clinton's elite team of covert ninja assassins. It's like when dumb ass right wing conspiracy theorists who think Obama had Antonin Scalia killed were like, "Why was a pillow over his head?" Wouldn't professional assassins NOT leave a pillow over his head?



See the above paragraph.

:snoop:

1) if a child abuse expert called me a child molester, wouldn't that hold more weight than say a cashier at mcdonalds saying it? <<< am i wrong here?

2) for the sake of argument let's say the DNC killed this guy; Julian Assange just put eyeballs on this guys' killers. if so, then that's a major power move, not some "trolling shyt" <<again, this is wrong?

3) you're clearly a Clinton/Leftist and that's fine, but you're blind allegiance is causing you to fall off the deep end with your arguments - fact of the matter is that this guy was killed and it wasn't a robbery, it was just a straight murder. It's not everyday that upper middle class white dudes just get shot and the killers just ride off into the sunset without even taking the mans wallet or his phone. <<<<wrong?
 
Top