I didn't say it was a stupid question to ask questions. I said it's a stupid question to ask what evidence is there that he wasn't killed. That's illogical, and a tired trick conspiracy theorists always try to pull: making a baseless assertion providing no evidence, then demanding someone disprove that baseless assertion when it can't be disproven. The onus is on you to support your claim with evidence.
And no, that is not strong evidence. That is not evidence, period. It's not even circumstantial evidence. Nothing.
Watch this:
"thatdude901 is a child molester."
Is that evidence to you?
Assange talking shyt means nothing without receipts. He's doing a disservice to his reputation as an exposer of truth with this trolling insinuation nonsense. If he produced evidence that dude was the leaker, we'd believe him. But he won't do it. He says he wants to protect his sources and won't reveal them, but dude is already dead so what's the problem? Why suggest it without coming out and saying it? With no evidence, I have to chalk it up to his ego, thirst for attention, and well-documented grudge against Hillary Clinton.
There is zero evidence that the guy killed was the leaker. I don't know how many people work at the DNC, but it's safe to say it's a lot. It's not 5 people manning an office. Someone getting killed on the streets of Washington D.C. after dark who happens to work at the DNC isn't some crazy statistical outlier.
Regarding the "affluent area," someone close to me lives in NW D.C. and while it has it's affluent parts, they're never too far from street shyt. And there was a string of recent robberies and carjackings in the area.
DNC employee fatally shot in Bloomingdale
And regarding why nothing was stolen from him, I don't know. Maybe he fought back and dude shot him and ran. I wasn't there. But think about what you're saying. Nothing was stolen from him so that means...it was a political assassination made to look like a robbery? That makes no sense.

Wouldn't these professional assassins do their due diligence to cover it and make it look like a robbery? That seems like amateur hour coming from Hillary Clinton's elite team of covert ninja assassins. It's like when dumb ass right wing conspiracy theorists who think Obama had Antonin Scalia killed were like, "Why was a pillow over his head?" Wouldn't professional assassins NOT leave a pillow over his head?
See the above paragraph.