Highly attractive women (dime pieces) have less casual sex than average women...

The Coochie Assassin

Banned
Supporter
Joined
Feb 15, 2013
Messages
14,544
Reputation
3,364
Daps
79,564
Reppin
RD4L
Any dude who been with enough women already knew this :yeshrug:...this a big reason why cats say "wife an average chick" too....it's not really cuz bad chicks aren't wife material...most dudes just know average chicks put out more (and there's more average chicks than fine ones lol).....only a small percentage of men can get baddies like that....gotta become an elite man..like top 5-10%......and becoming that man ain't impossible...most men just don't sacrifice to get that lifestyle - they settle for an average life
 

Birdie

Banned
Joined
Apr 10, 2015
Messages
2,502
Reputation
-1,205
Daps
10,533
Reppin
New York City
This has nothing to do with them having "a lot options" the average male is just more intimidated to talk to women of a higher attractive level. They feel more confident hitting on a Lil Mama over a Ciara because they believe they will have a better chance at getting with her and if she does decline they feel it's less of a loss, if the typical guy knew that their is absolutely nothing special about a women because of how she looks this wouldn't even be a problem.
 

Akata Man Bromo

Still learning....
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
37,424
Reputation
12,524
Daps
133,762
Reppin
Dade/Broward
True, but they might be susceptible to STD's at a higher rate do to the types of dudes they end up being with. :sas2: A "dime" is going to most likely seek a "bread winner" "alpha male" "athlete" "famous (local or state wide)" "very desirable" person ( and rightfully so) but most dudes like that have access to women from all types of backgrounds and levels of attractiveness... In dealing with these dudes, they open themselves up to a whole lot of fukkery on the STD tip, although they have been less active. So dont think they are less likely to have some shyt :mjpls: Just my opinion, could be wrong :ehh:
 

Larry Lambo

Superstar
Joined
Sep 5, 2015
Messages
8,814
Reputation
1,710
Daps
30,675
Definitely some truth to it.

But I think it's because attractive women are more likely to be attracted to men at their level, whereas average/unattractive women tend to be attracted to men above their level.

When you deal with men at your level it's more likely to be in the form of a relationship, when you deal with men above your level it's more likely to be casual.

A female 5 that is truly attracted to male 5's is probably going to have less partners than a female 7 that wants male 9's and 10's.
 

MalikX

Superstar
Joined
Dec 24, 2015
Messages
7,554
Reputation
1,920
Daps
39,333
Reppin
Worldwide Entertainment
Definitely some truth to it.

But I think it's because attractive women are more likely to be attracted to men at their level, whereas average/unattractive women tend to be attracted to men above their level.

When you deal with men at your level it's more likely to be in the form of a relationship, when you deal with men above your level it's more likely to be casual.

A female 5 that is truly attracted to male 5's is probably going to have less partners than a female 7 that wants male 9's and 10's.

This kinda goes against the theory that men are chasing Instagram dimes, no?

Maybe the dimes aren't lying when they say no men approach them?

And....the average ones are stuck up because every man approaches them thinking it's an easy slam dunk when too many guys doing that causes them think they're special. Plus, increasing their sexual partners over time relative to the dimes, who guys are afraid to step to.

I kinda already knew this...it's just interesting seeing it put into research :jbhmm:
 

ultraflexed

Superstar
Joined
Nov 5, 2015
Messages
17,230
Reputation
3,095
Daps
51,411
Jealousy and envy from sad individuals not from the town:manny:
No need to envy lol i live in the bay which is why I can speak on it from experience. There's nothing to envy about these parts .[/QUOTE]

That is b/c they only fck with wealthy males. They have less options since most males aren't wealthy.

Your fave instagram girl only answers dm's from Dubai oil owners and NBA players.


lol j/k because the article isn't true at all. It's completely false/made up. 1. b/c attractiveness is subjective 2. b/c no studies were done, and studies can't be done b/c #1

That article is basically saying "all women want relationships, ugly women can't get relationships so settle for sex, attractive women can get a relationship which is why they don't have to have casual sex". Just stupid.

People who don't like casual sex have less casual sex than people who do. That is all. :queen:

Disagree.

Attractive is not subjective but how hansome or beautiful someone is subjective.

Example: most agree that beyonce is attractive, I don't think anyone in there right mind would rate beyonce under a 88-80ish, some of us have at a 95 other have her at 80 but we all think she's attractive is the common denominator. I think if you have 100 guys line up against the wall, 75 of them would agree that beyonce is attractive that's a super majority.

Same with Blake Lively, we all agree her shape is not the greatest but her face is very beautiful 80/100 people would agree
 

Larry Lambo

Superstar
Joined
Sep 5, 2015
Messages
8,814
Reputation
1,710
Daps
30,675
I don't think it's because "guys are scared to approach dimes". The bad chicks I knew got approached a lot but had consistent boyfriends.

The number of times you get approached is not necessarily related to the number of partners.

Dudes being intimidated by "dimes" is overblown. Guys choose not to approach pretty chicks if they deem her physique to be average. But if the chick has a fat ass, it don't matter if she has movie star looks in the face, she's gonna get hollered at.
 
Top