Guys are gonna reach for some bullshyt argument like 'they got the benefit of the doubt/bygones etc' but truthfully do these people ever get investigated when there's overwhelming proof against them? It doesn't appear so. If this two party paradigm really was what we're led to believe then there would have been SOMEONE pushing investigation, but if it fits their common agenda then our present situation makes much more sense.Why wasn't Bush,Cheney,Rumsfeld, or Powell investigated to this extent for 9/11/2001 or Abu Gharib? Just asking. Could all partisan fakkits not respond. Thank you.


Yeah, having the actual sitting President of Iran at the time make the accusation as well as some of the hostages lends enough weight to take it up a few notches from just a conspiracy theory.there's evidence that actually happened though
Not at all, theres nothing new, and the democrats on the panel keep pointing that out.so is she looking bad?
Nope.so is she looking bad?

Idiots allowed this to be a fukking Hillary infomercial. A whole day for her to explain her love of country and all the efforts made to save the Americans in Benghazi. All while a Republican congress kept cutting funding for aid.
Who decided this would be a good look for the Republicans again?
![]()
