You had a point? Really? Because all you said was that I should have stepped out. SO I guess I swung and missed hard on reading your mind to determine your point too.
A critique on the assessment that Hillary is running a master-class level campaign in a thread about Hillary running a master class level campaign made good sense to me when I posted it but maybe there's a better thread where it fits, if you know one can you point me in the direction of that thread?
From beginning by thinking people were saying trumps lack of viability as a candiate is due to Hillary, to ending your post with a declaration of how unfit she is, you managed to miss the point of the thread is her campaign strategy not her fitness for office, largely due to your eagerness to voice your displeasure about Hillary and her viability as a candiate.
To that end, there are a host of threads (on the first page ironically) where you can continue to state how unfit she is and how horrible of a candiate she is and it would at the same time at least make sense, rather than you just going in every thread with a sprinkle of positivity surrounding her and making sure to add in your two cents that you think she is horrible.
This election is far from over, this no time to be popping champagne bottles.
What is so masterful about mudslinging and outright fabricating shyt....in a country with real journalists this would have backfired spectacularly because they would look into the validity and origin of the allegations.
