Hillary Not Getting Indicted Proves Socialism Does Not Work On Two Ways

[Prince.Skeletor]

There's nothing to refute because you didn't formulate a coherent argument

I don't think you understand what coherent means.

Example: where I live the mafia has a monopoly on construction. Whether it be roads or bridges wtv. They get no bid contracts with high profit margin, no competition & take forever to do patch up jobs that always need rework.

1) Govt does nothing to fix the problem since decades.
2) the ppl know this as fact yet never one protest & never a demand for it to be an election issue.

Conclusion: the only two participants in socialism cannot be trusted.

Is that "coherent" for you now breh?

 

[JahFocus CS]

#LowerLearning

 

[ⒶⓁⒾⒶⓈ]

I don't think you understand what coherent means.

Example: where I live the mafia has a monopoly on construction. Whether it be roads or bridges wtv. They get no bid contracts with high profit margin, no competition & take forever to do patch up jobs that always need rework.

1) Govt does nothing to fix the problem since decades.
2) the ppl know this as fact yet never one protest & never a demand for it to be an election issue.

Conclusion: the only two participants in socialism cannot be trusted.

Is that "coherent" for you now breh?

They do that round here too bruh..theres connected people who always get those contracts ..they charge the state millions and put those orange cones on the road
But 90% of the time theres no workers..just cones and construction equipment sitting there...why ?

 

[Robbie3000]

I have no idea what you are trying to say. Are you high?

 

[DEAD7]

Conclusion: the only two participants in socialism cannot be trusted.

No one can be trusted in any system.
Men are irrational actors.

 

[Prince.Skeletor]

I have no idea what you are trying to say. Are you high?

What exactly is complicated?
In socialism the people are forced to fund govt initiatives rather than the private sector.
Govt cannot be trusted, we know this, now with Hillary even with mass media coverage still no accountability, a basic F U to the ppl.
And the people, where the money comes from, cannot be trusted to keep govt in check.
From city construction to state wide initiatives to federal programs all the way to national security & even imperialism.

There's no accountability, no quest for future accountability, and mass corruption only on the rise.

If you cannot control the arms of an octopus CUT THEM OFF!
Limited govt is the answer.
Socialism is not for this continent.

 

[koolkeef]

Let private corporations build and own infrastructure and make every road a toll road, brehs.

At least, I think that's what OP is saying...

 

[Prince.Skeletor]

Let private corporations build and own infrastructure and make every road a toll road, brehs.

At least, I think that's what OP is saying...

I will admit roads are the biggest dilemma.
But to say toll booths on every road is just a failure of the imagination.
And if roads are our only problem we are on the right path!

 

[DEAD7]

Let private corporations build and own infrastructure and make every road a toll road, brehs.

Let govt. build and own infrastructure and lag painfully behind the times brehs
Have structurally deficient bridges brehs
Have lead in you water brehs
Have high hazard dams brehs
Have a highway funding shortfall of 12 billion brehs
Have shytty levies brehs
Earn a D+ on you infrastructure report card despite being the wealthiest nation brehs

 

[rapbeats]

Lies after constant lies.
Lied under oath as well but not even perjury.
Hillary supporters happy despite all the proven lies.

Socialism has two main participants.
Govt. and the people.

Hillary being Scott free means govt can't be trusted. In socialism govt is the redistributor.
Misappropriation of funds will never equate to accountability.

Then the people. They are ok with Hillary being innocent & will even vote for her to be president. They also cannot be trusted.

If govt is showing signs of corruption the ppl gotta keep in check but they won't.

Socialism is NOT for America!

Well. lets see. that all depends. right now you're making this statement based on the way things are TODAY. not the way things would be if we were a socialist society. that can change the manner in which people think.

some of these socialist countries have approx a 90% voter turn out. thats crazy. what do we have in america? i dont think its even half. i dont feel like looking. so less than half of the population is doing all of the voting. This means. maybe we would have many more people involved in the voting process. thats a step in the right direction. the step we need to take next is to have SMARTER voter turnout. dumb voters doesnt help. smart ones should do the trick. maybe more people vote more often. it becomes a thing where they see what they vote for take place right away. vs all sorts of silly read tape of our current setup. people could then be more inclined to read about the candidates they are voting on. or the propositions they are voting for.

but to your point if things stay the same, we have the exact same mentality and all of a sudden we became a socialist society. seeing what we've recently seen with this hillary stuff. it wouldnt work in our best interest. but guess what. this idea means nothing in reality. because we know it aint working for us RIGHT NOW in the current system.

Dont be so quick to ride against a different system that you believe wouldnt work. vs riding on your current system that surely isnt working for most of its citizens.

would you rather lose by 25 points or lose by 15? you're still a loser regardless. how much you lose by is semantics.

 

[Robbie3000]

What exactly is complicated?
In socialism the people are forced to fund govt initiatives rather than the private sector.
Govt cannot be trusted, we know this, now with Hillary even with mass media coverage still no accountability, a basic F U to the ppl.
And the people, where the money comes from, cannot be trusted to keep govt in check.
From city construction to state wide initiatives to federal programs all the way to national security & even imperialism.

There's no accountability, no quest for future accountability, and mass corruption only on the rise.

If you cannot control the arms of an octopus CUT THEM OFF!
Limited govt is the answer.
Socialism is not for this continent.

People had a chance to hold her accountable, but they voted for her. Looks like more of an issue with representative democracy than socialism.

They also allowed Wall Street bankers to get away with corruption, is tha an indictment against socialism?

 

[Prince.Skeletor]

No one can be trusted in any system.
Men are irrational actors.

That's why you empower the people through free market & limited govt so the mass makes decisions and not individuals.

 

[Prince.Skeletor]

Let private corporations build and own infrastructure and make every road a toll road, brehs.

At least, I think that's what OP is saying...

One more things on roads.
You must be looking at me oddly right now but what if we had privatized roads today & I wanted socialism?

You would say "If I understand correctly the OP wants the mafia or organized crime to have a monopoly with no bid contracts with massive profit margins on all city/state construction work with planned obsolescence in mind meaning never ending patch up jobs & poorly constructed bridges. At least that's what I think the OP is saying"

How do you oppress the people?
Well you need a powerful non accountable govt. How do you achieve that?
By indoctrinating the people and making them overly dependant on the most corrupt entity, Government!
Make it seem ludicrous that they can run their own lives.

 

[Prince.Skeletor]

O

People had a chance to hold her accountable, but they voted for her. Looks like more of an issue with representative democracy than socialism.

They also allowed Wall Street bankers to get away with corruption, is tha an indictment against socialism?

For point 1 it's both. Yes it is a problem with representative democracy but also an indication that the people cannot be entrusted with socialism if they fail so badly at representative democracy.

For point 2 yes absolutely!
The bailouts were a result of socialist central planning. 100% socialism, I can go into more detail if you wish