HL Climate Change Thread: Fare the well old world

[Crakface]

Its just pollution not the end of the world.

 

[Domingo Halliburton]

http://www.drexel.edu/~/media/Files/now/pdfs/Institutionalizing Delay - Climatic Change.ashx

here's the actual paper because that article really doesn't really reveal anything

 

[The Real]

Cacs just talking that climate change to stop the growth of nations they dont want to compete against. Its so pathetic.

It's people in those poorer nations who are most affected by it. Entire islands in the pacific are being submerged underwater. Cities in Asia and Africa are becoming uninhabitable because of extreme heat zones. Etc. Look up the Maldives. That's a country that probably won't exist 100 years from now just because it will be underwater. Their entire population is being forced to flee and seek citizenship elsewhere.

Cape Verde will be in trouble soon, too. Their ambassadors and diplomats are some of the biggest supports of efforts to combat climate change, because they know they will be among the first wave of nations to be hit the hardest.

 

[Crakface]

It's people in those poorer nations who are most affected by it. Entire islands in the pacific are being submerged underwater. Cities in Asia and Africa are becoming uninhabitable because of extreme heat zones. Etc. Look up the Maldives. That's a country that probably won't exist 100 years from now just because it will be underwater. Their entire population is being forced to flee and seek citizenship elsewhere.

Cape Verde will be in trouble soon, too. Their ambassadors and diplomats are some of the biggest supports of efforts to combat climate change, because they know they will be among the first wave of nations to be hit the hardest.

O well nikkas will move and find somewhere else to live. Nations gotta come up, then we can talk about curbing emissions. A few islands and regions are expendable. If Japan i ok after a reactior meltdown i think we'll be ok.

 

[PikaDaDon]

Climate science is an immensely complex discipline. The fact of the matter is that man-made global warming is unverifiable. There's a plethora of unknown variables and factors beyond our control. Politicians and influential people within the political, finance, energy, military, etc. sphere have used what little evidence we have to fuel these massive propaganda campaigns.

There's far too much political influence within the scientific community. And that, I believe, only serves as a deterrent for real scientific progress. By now I believe we should have flying cars, nuclear fusion, and a lunar colony by now but the government is holding science back.

O well nikkas will move and find somewhere else to live. Nations gotta come up, then we can talk about curbing emissions. A few islands and regions are expendable. If Japan i ok after a reactior meltdown i think we'll be ok.

 

[88m3]

thanks for sharing @The Real @Domingo Halliburton

 

[Fillerguy]

this trolling lame always manages to get yall

 

[Crakface]

Climate science is an immensely complex discipline. The fact of the matter is that man-made global warming is unverifiable. There's a plethora of unknown variables and factors beyond our control. Politicians and influential people within the political, finance, energy, military, etc. sphere have used what little evidence we have to fuel these massive propaganda campaigns.

There's far too much political influence within the scientific community. And that, I believe, only serves as a deterrent for real scientific progress. By now I believe we should have flying cars, nuclear fusion, and a lunar colony by now but the government is holding science back.

Yea, at the end of the day, the doomsday warnings from climate researchers with all this *if we dont do it right now its going to be too late* Ok well its to late now what. We're still breathing. Nothing has happened and nothing will happen as a result of car emissions besides maybe the morons living in those cities dying. Might be time to get up off the west coast though. Cacs had to go and make at0m1c weapons. Now, the world is fukked. Praying africa gets the economy poppin before i die so i can retire in tranquility.

 

[JasonSJackson]

This should make it clear that the people who run the controlling instiutions of this world seek to destroy it.

 

[mbewane]

http://www.slate.com/blogs/bad_astr...y_shows_they_don_t_publish_actual_papers.html

In 2012, National Science Board member James Lawrence Powell investigated peer-reviewed literature published about climate change and found that out of 13,950 articles, 13,926 supported the reality of global warming. Despite a lot of sound and fury from the denial machine, deniers have not really been able to come up with a coherent argument against a consensus. The same is true for a somewhat different study that showed a 97 percent consensus among climate scientists supporting both the reality of global warming and the fact that human emissions are behind it.

Powell recently finished another such investigation, this time looking at peer-reviewed articles published between November 2012 and December 2013. Out of 2,258 articles (with 9,136 authors), how many do you think explicitly rejected human-driven global warming? Go on, guess!

One. Yes, one.

 

[Domingo Halliburton]

the only plausible argument is increased solar activity the last 100 years or so and even then you're pretty much grasping at straws

 

[Brown_Pride]

the only plausible argument is increased solar activity the last 100 years or so and even then you're pretty much grasping at straws

while i haven't read all those articles mentioned by the OP do you suppose any of them tag solar activity as the sole cause?

 

[Domingo Halliburton]

while i haven't read all those articles mentioned by the OP do you suppose any of them tag solar activity as the sole cause?

I doubt it but I can't say that with 100% certainty.

 

[Brown_Pride]

I doubt it but I can't say that with 100% certainty.

Hmm. ok then either i missed the sarcasm in your post or I missed the part where you backed up your claim with something scientific (seeing as 97% of climatologist attribute it to humans as per the OP i'm assuming your theory is being championed by that 3%?)

 

[Domingo Halliburton]

Hmm. ok then either i missed the sarcasm in your post or I missed the part where you backed up your claim with something scientific (seeing as 97% of climatologist attribute it to humans as per the OP i'm assuming your theory is being championed by that 3%?)

oh I wasn't being sarcastic. I just honestly don't know if that's the reason they are citing in their papers. Just from googling information I've seen increased solar activity like flares as the most common or plausible reason deniers use. I really haven't read any scientific studies on either side of the debate as it seems like the vast majority agree it's man-made.