homo's that use science to have children are selfish

[Kuwka_Atcha_Ratcha]

Having a kid is selfish. Like how much of an @sshole do you have to be to think "You know, I'm okay with bringing a child into this world, another thing to eat up resources and contribute to overpopulation, all because I feel like leaving a legacy and the best way to do that is through an offspring?" What a dikk thing to do.

you're actually right to an extent, but to cripple the child by not allowing him or her a mother of a father is perhaps past selfish n borderline insane.

 

[Kuwka_Atcha_Ratcha]

If that's how you choose to look at it, that's very pessimistic.

What matters is that a child is raised with love and support.
It doesn't really matter if the parents are same-sex or not.

Look around. Plenty of heterosexual couples have done a terrible job at raising children.

What would be a robbery for a child is if a child was taken out of a loving home with homosexual parents and placed in a dysfunctional home with heterosexual parents.

you're talking about if a child was adopted,

i am not.

is it okay to create a child knowing he or she will NOT have a mother of father which is a handicap

 

[sun raw]

you're actually right to an extent, but to cripple the child by not allowing him or her a mother of a father is perhaps past selfish n borderline insane.

Not as selfish and insane as looking at a gay couple who have a kid and going "Those fukkers, using science for the purpose it was made for."

 

[Remote]

you're talking about if a child was adopted,

i am not.

is it okay to create a child knowing he or she will NOT have a mother of father which is a handicap

I don't think it's a handicap to have two parents of the same gender.
I think it's a handicap to have two parents who are not good at parenting.

 

[Kuwka_Atcha_Ratcha]

I don't think it's a handicap to have two parents of the same gender.
I think it's a handicap to have two parents who are not good at parenting.

setting a child up to NOT EVER have either a mother of a father is a handicap. its insane as to why its even allowed.

 

[Kuwka_Atcha_Ratcha]

Not as selfish and insane as looking at a gay couple who have a kid and going "Those fukkers, using science for the purpose it was made for."

i feel sorry for the child, growing up without a mother of father. how sad. how disgusting.

 

[Remote]

setting a child up to NOT EVER have either a mother of a father is a handicap. its insane as to why its even allowed.

I disagree.

 

[MR. SNIFLES]

If god made you without science and you have a mother and father, its perfectly okay to go to the doctor and get your medicines and prescriptions. But if you was adopted and or a test tube babie, then you gots to die, until yo father come back, then you can gets medicines. #Science #WWJD #BengBeng

 

[Kuwka_Atcha_Ratcha]

I disagree.

both mother and father is VITAL.

 

[killacal]

Yall can't even refute the man's point, all I hear is but what about.....

 

[Mountain]

I don't think it's a handicap to have two parents of the same gender.
I think it's a handicap to have two parents who are not good at parenting.

According to this study it is (Family Research Council )

besides it doesnt take a damn genius to figure out same sex parenting aint right.

 

[Kuwka_Atcha_Ratcha]

According to this study it is (Family Research Council )

besides it doesnt take a damn genius to figure out same sex parenting aint right.

evidence and proof

 

[Kuwka_Atcha_Ratcha]

Yall can't even refute the man's point, all I hear is but what about.....

exactly, im open to discussion but all im seeing is buts *no homo*

 

[Draje]

this isn't even a good comparison. lol not even nearly.

having children = biological, biology such as children is dictated by god/nature depending on what you believe in.

technology is created by man for man.

you're comparing recreational technology to biology which is exclusive for hetro couples. if you can't see how your comparison fails then not much I can do to further extinguish your ignorance.

The Fukk? You can't make a comment about how if nature wanted you to do something, you'd be able to do it without technology's help and then backtrack it.

You can't prove that nature dictated they being gay means they're unable to be fit parents simply because gay people are unable to biologically procreate together. If a gay man's sperm is able to able to create children in a woman then biology has stated that he has viable sperm to create children.

 

[Kuwka_Atcha_Ratcha]

The Fukk? You can't make a comment about how if nature wanted you to do something, you'd be able to do it without technology's help and then backtrack it.

You can't prove that nature dictated they being gay means they're unable to be fit parents simply because gay people are unable to biologically procreate together. If a gay man's sperm is able to able to create children in a woman then biology has stated that he has viable sperm to create children.

see bold : and i wonder why that is

even without the nature side of things, its robbing a child of either a mother or father, the guy further up posted FACTS that this is a handicap to the child.