honestly is serena williams the GOAT Female athlete??

El Bombi

Banned
Joined
Aug 31, 2012
Messages
53,517
Reputation
2,432
Daps
152,940
Reppin
NULL

3 are from doubles...Anna Kournikova has won Doubles titles, and she was trash.

The Heptatahlon is 7 different events in itself, and JJK's record in the event is still unbeaten after 25 years.

and she won that shyt twice.

if we're just basing this off athleticism, JJK>>>>>>>Serena.

Well if that the case.

Carl Lewis>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Michael Jordan.
 

gho3st

plata or plomo
Joined
Oct 27, 2012
Messages
35,274
Reputation
3,155
Daps
85,792
Reppin
2016
this serena williams gif though :patrice:

8vz1z5m9du85.gif
 

MegaTronBomb!

Power is in my hair nikka
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
14,236
Reputation
2,525
Daps
44,385
Reppin
From The Westside With Love
Well if that the case.

Carl Lewis>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Michael Jordan.

Michael Jordan also sucked at baseball, so yeah... you right.

as pure athletes, Michael Jordan would not even rank in the top 25 blacks of all time.


but Carl Lewis is a hating fakkit, but he's still a far better athlete than Jordan.
 

Ready2Rhyme

Young, Gifted, and Black
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
619
Reputation
-10
Daps
503
Venus is the better tennis player tho...
That hasn't been the case in 12 years breh :heh:

Gotta disagree. Serena's resume is much longer than Venus', yes. Serena's dominance was sustained over a longer period of time, yes.

But take both players at their peak performance levels, and nobody in history is beating a Venus Williams at her best.

[NOTE* Both Venus and Serena have been set back by major injuries and personal life traumas, and Serena has been able to bounce back fairly often and keep up her performance at close to her peak. So she has the results to show for that. There's a lot to be said for personal resilience. And both Venus and Serena are far ahead of everybody else.]

When Venus was on she couldn't be beat. I admit that's a personal opinion. But I liked her approach to the game. Every time she swung the racket, every shot, she was looking to hit a winner. In those 2 years of her peak, the only way Venus could lose is if she beat herself with unforced errors. Venus still has the record for fastest serve in history. The power of her ground-strokes was unmatched, tho Serena's came close (Serena's serve was also close, but no cigar). Venus's court coverage was also unmatched, she was fast as hell, and her length further allowed her to get to every ball. It is Venus who taught everybody, both men and women players, about the swinging forehand volley. That used to be a tennis no-no.

Serena is the GOAT, I admit. The resume of sustained excellence is too long. But there is a coffee-shop argument for Venus being the better player.
 

Reggie

Veteran
Joined
May 19, 2012
Messages
91,706
Reputation
5,034
Daps
193,621
Reppin
Virginia
Serena a bad chick and she just might be the GOAT. I'm surprised no one has ever threw any Ped accusations at her.
 

malbaker86

Gators
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
56,648
Reputation
7,340
Daps
126,355
Reppin
Jacksonville, FL
Gotta disagree. Serena's resume is much longer than Venus', yes. Serena's dominance was sustained over a longer period of time, yes.

But take both players at their peak performance levels, and nobody in history is beating a Venus Williams at her best.

[NOTE* Both Venus and Serena have been set back by major injuries and personal life traumas, and Serena has been able to bounce back fairly often and keep up her performance at close to her peak. So she has the results to show for that. There's a lot to be said for personal resilience. And both Venus and Serena are far ahead of everybody else.]

When Venus was on she couldn't be beat. I admit that's a personal opinion. But I liked her approach to the game. Every time she swung the racket, every shot, she was looking to hit a winner. In those 2 years of her peak, the only way Venus could lose is if she beat herself with unforced errors. Venus still has the record for fastest serve in history. The power of her ground-strokes was unmatched, tho Serena's came close (Serena's serve was also close, but no cigar). Venus's court coverage was also unmatched, she was fast as hell, and her length further allowed her to get to every ball. It is Venus who taught everybody, both men and women players, about the swinging forehand volley. That used to be a tennis no-no.

Serena is the GOAT, I admit. The resume of sustained excellence is too long. But there is a coffee-shop argument for Venus being the better player.

Serena is better tha Venus. ONLY surface where you could make a case where Venus is/was better was/is at Wimbledon and they both have the same amount of titles there. In their first primes last decade.....

Winner 2002 French Open Clay Venus Williams 7–5, 6–3
Winner 2002 Wimbledon Grass Venus Williams 7–6(7–4), 6–3
Winner 2002 US Open (2) Hard Venus Williams 6–4, 6–3
Winner 2003 Australian Open Hard Venus Williams 7–6(7–4), 3–6, 6–4
Winner 2003 Wimbledon (2) Grass Venus Williams 4–6, 6–4, 6–2

Vince got her in 2001 at the US Open and at the 08 Wimbledon
 

Ready2Rhyme

Young, Gifted, and Black
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
619
Reputation
-10
Daps
503
Serena is better tha Venus. ONLY surface where you could make a case where Venus is/was better was/is at Wimbledon and they both have the same amount of titles there. In their first primes last decade.....



Vince got her in 2001 at the US Open and at the 08 Wimbledon

Since you're counting how many titles each player has to judge who's better, I know you couldn't possibly be addressing my post. I know you're not stupid. You must've quoted the wrong person.:lupe:
 
Top