Houston officially lost!! "Boy p*ssy" :scust:

G.O.A.T Squad Spokesman

Logic Is Absent Wherever Hate Is Present
Joined
May 12, 2012
Messages
79,935
Reputation
5,715
Daps
235,051
1-LordJamar.304.jpg
 

En Sabah Nur

The First
Joined
May 10, 2012
Messages
4,765
Reputation
1,769
Daps
22,602
Reppin
Survival of the fittest
Before they could lie down, the men of the city, the men of Sod′om, surrounded the house, from boy to old man, all the people in one mob.  And they kept calling out to Lot and saying to him: “Where are the men who came in to you tonight? Bring them out to us that we may have intercourse with them.”
 

h2o_proof

Thread Closed...As Usual
Joined
May 25, 2012
Messages
1,953
Reputation
602
Daps
5,142
Reppin
Houston
Any of you nikkas that accepted Frank Ocean after he announced he liked men can thank yourselves for everything that got set in motion after that.

Naw bro, I can't necessarily cosign that cuz Channel Orange was dope. I think the issue here is with the overt display of sexuality in the video and the explicitly suggestive lyrics. Everyone is free to express their love for whomever, but this song and video was downright distasteful and contained no redeeming artistic value. I'd compare it more to Nicki Minaj's release of "Lookin' Ass nikka" earlier this year moreso than Frank Ocean cuz my issue is that while lil homie has the right to express himself freely (as did Nicki with Malcolm on the cover art), he's doing so at the expense of artistic integrity (unless you consider "boy p*ssy" to be a dope metaphor):huhldup:.

As I mentioned in an earlier post, it's really got me rethinking some things, particularly where the lines between 'shock value' and equal rights are blurred. How can I accept this behavior from heterosexuals but have opposition to the behavior from homosexuals? But even still I'm conflicted, because what if this were a love song about two consenting homosexuals that was not overtly misogynistic or explicit? How would I feel then? I don't quite know the answer on that one, but I can say with certainty that while Ocean's "Forrest Gump" was not for me, it did have redeeming artistic value.

This is not an indictment against you dude, I typically agree with a lot of your posts, but we can't blame this one on Frank.
 

Larry

...
Joined
May 3, 2012
Messages
15,028
Reputation
3,197
Daps
51,338
man honestly please delete this thread


we feeding into it by giving this shyt attention. lets ignore it.


tbh IDK who the mods are on this forum because even tho I post about 4-5 times a day, I don't really pay attention like that. Someone @ them so we can get this disgust off the site
 

G.O.A.T Squad Spokesman

Logic Is Absent Wherever Hate Is Present
Joined
May 12, 2012
Messages
79,935
Reputation
5,715
Daps
235,051
Naw bro, I can't necessarily cosign that cuz Channel Orange was dope. I think the issue here is with the overt display of sexuality in the video and the explicitly suggestive lyrics. Everyone is free to express their love for whomever, but this song and video was downright distasteful and contained no redeeming artistic value. I'd compare it more to Nicki Minaj's release of "Lookin' Ass nikka" earlier this year moreso than Frank Ocean cuz my issue is that while lil homie has the right to express himself freely (as did Nicki with Malcolm on the cover art), he's doing so at the expense of artistic integrity (unless you consider "boy p*ssy" to be a dope metaphor):huhldup:.

As I mentioned in an earlier post, it's really got me rethinking some things, particularly where the lines between 'shock value' and equal rights are blurred. How can I accept this behavior from heterosexuals but have opposition to the behavior from homosexuals? But even still I'm conflicted, because what if this were a love song about two consenting homosexuals that was not overtly misogynistic or explicit? How would I feel then? I don't quite know the answer on that one, but I can say with certainty that while Ocean's "Forrest Gump" was not for me, it did have redeeming artistic value.

This is not an indictment against you dude, I typically agree with a lot of your posts, but we can't blame this one on Frank.

When the urban community accepted an openly gay/bi male artist it opened the floodgates for what we're now witnessing and will witness moving forward. Boy George and Culture Club made a lot of good records but if you rode around bumping that shyt post-gangsta rap you would be associated with that kind of sexuality yourself. It's not about the music, nikkas should've turned a deaf ear to Frank Ocean for agenda purposes alone no matter how much they liked his music.

There's a reason why Luther and Freddie Jackson stayed in the closet. They knew their fan base wouldn't accept them.
 
Top