How a man name Jesus exist 2k years ago, when letter J is only 500 yrs (VIDEO)

[Dafunkdoc_Unlimited]

But your jesus is son of god . So your saying jesus dad didn't exist?

Son of........what?​

and that's all your gonna get cac mangod worshiper

Noncognitivists don't 'worship' anything. Seems you have some difficulties with logic. Here, let me help you.....

Strawman Fallacy

​

 

[egg]

Son of........what?​

Noncognitivists don't 'worship' anything. Seems you have some difficulties with logic. Here, let me help you.....

Strawman Fallacy

​

if you are atheist in hiding then you have no reason to believe Jesus of the bible... So what are you arguing with me about his existence for? So you don't worship god but believe 2000 years ago a man was born and performed miracles, all based of writings in a book? And you want me to prove that this BS story never happened

 

[Dafunkdoc_Unlimited]

if you are atheist in hiding then you have no reason to believe Jesus of the bible

Theological Noncognitivists are not 'atheists in hiding'. I believe the man existed based on evidence. You, on the other hand, are showing (one of the) reason(s) why I cannot be an atheist. If you cannot define what it is you don't believe exists, then your entire ideology implodes due to lack of logic. You have NO coherent ontology to describe what it is you're trying to disprove which is an exercise in futility. Also, since you are an atheist, you cannot infer ANYTHING since naturalism provides no way to gauge 'truth'.

In order for YOU to say something is 'true', you'd have to affirm something you deny (the supernatural) and, thus, enmesh yourself in a logical contradiction from which there is no escape.

You asserted that the man didn't exist and have provided NO evidence to prove that assertion.​

 

[egg]

If you cannot define what it is you don't believe exists, then your entire ideology implodes due to lack of logic. You have NO coherent ontology to describe what it is you're trying to disprove which is an exercise in futility. Also, since you are an atheist, you cannot infer ANYTHING since naturalism provides no way to gauge 'truth'.

So if i can't define something... it must exist WOW thanks dafunkdoc you totally proved that god exist, i believe in it now because i don't know what it is. i was blind but now i can see

You asserted that the man didn't exist and have provided NO evidence to prove that assertion.​

umm you still haven't addressed the fact that Jesus performed miracles? Do you accept the (anecdotal) evidence that he did perform them as evidence?

 

[Dafunkdoc_Unlimited]

So if i can't define something... it must exist

No. If you can't define something, talking about it's existence or your lack of belief in its existence is stupid.
​

umm you still haven't addressed the fact that Jesus performed miracles?

Define 'miracle'.​

 

[egg]

Define 'miracle'.

man do you need a dictionary? are you going to keep diverting and avoiding the question? did Jesus walk on water? cure blindness? rise from the dead?

 

[Dafunkdoc_Unlimited]

man do you need a dictionary?

No. You just have to supply an objective definition of 'god'.

All the things you listed don't define that term.

​

 

[egg]

No. You just have to supply an objective definition of 'god'.

All the things you listed don't define that term.

​

Yeah yeah You just have to keep ignoring the question of jesus doing magic

 

[Dafunkdoc_Unlimited]

Yeah yeah You just have to keep ignoring the question of jesus doing magic

Men (and women) do/did magic.....which doesn't prove Jesus didn't exist.


​

 

[egg]

Men (and women) do/did magic

no they don't

which doesn't prove Jesus didn't exist.

it proves the story in the bible is not true

 

[Dafunkdoc_Unlimited]

no they don't

Wrong....

Westcar Papyrus - Wikipedia
​

The Westcar Papyrus is an ancient Egyptian text containing five stories about miracles performed by priests and magicians. In the text, each of these tales are told at the royal court of Pharaoh Cheops (4th dynasty) by his sons. The story in the papyrus is usually rendered in English as "King Cheops and the Magicians"

it proves the story in the bible is not true

Sorry, but your ideology cannot objectively define 'true' without refuting itself and rendering your entire argument invalid.

Still waiting for your proof that he did not exist.
​

 

[alpo]

that egg dude retarded

 

[egg]

Wrong....

Westcar Papyrus - Wikipedia

liar

Sorry, but your ideology cannot objectively define 'true' without refuting itself and rendering your entire argument invalid.

Still waiting for your proof that he did not exist.

You've gotten it multiple times and you still refuse to see the truth

 

[egg]

that egg dude retarded

but you dapped him for claiming people do magic

 

[alpo]

but you dapped him for claiming people do magic

if you don't believe that, you really not trying to find the answer