How analytics overrate Chris Paul

Cladyclad

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Jun 3, 2012
Messages
49,376
Reputation
5,490
Daps
125,297
Reppin
Detroit Lions, Michigan Wolverines & LWO
Because of his extremely fast hands , ability to read passing lanes before they happen & the combination of having a low center of gravity with great lateral quickness (something which GP annoyed even MJ with).

Also pick dodging. He always makes the correct reads in navagating through screens set on him that would slow most defenders.

Nobody really handles dealing with screens as well as Paul does.

I get it Chris competes on Defense to certain extent but very often when I watch national TV games against elite PG's I see this more than often. They treat him like he not the best defensive point guard of all time





I really don't get his greatness. Paul makes plays but I don't get it:yeshrug:
 
Joined
Dec 18, 2013
Messages
799
Reputation
260
Daps
1,631
Eh, Chris Paul is one of the 30 best players ever. He's one of the best two-way players for over a decade and you make the argument that he's one of the three greatest point guards ever as a pure talent, maybe fourth because Stockton is very, very underrated.

For me, it's tough to truly rip Paul because his teams were bad, too. Those Hornets team lived off Paul P&R and build themselves off it - West, Chandler, Peja, Posey. The Clippers couldn't get out their own way with roster construction, often leaving them without an ideal bench.
 

Guess Who

Superstar
Joined
May 5, 2012
Messages
13,508
Reputation
2,514
Daps
37,665
Reppin
NULL
The thing that makes Chris Paul good is also his biggest flaw and that is Chris Paul led teams rely on him to carry an extremely heavy load on both sides of the floor. No player in the history of the NBA has been able to succeed in the playoffs while having to lead the defence and initiate the offence every time down the court in order for his team to be successful.

Of course you can make the argument that Chris Paul's ball dominance doesn't allow his teammates to learn how to initiate offence without him but the reality is that the best players he has played with are David West, a pretty good player who was an all-star mainly because of CP3 getting him open in the mid-range off pick and rolls and Blake Griffin, a great player that seems to consistently shrink in 4th quarters.

I think the Chris Paul narrative would have been a lot different if he had a more reliable second option he could rely on in the playoffs at some point in his career. People forget that CP3 was well on his way to winning an MVP with the Hornets the year he fukked up his knee, and that was in a league with many legendary players (Lebron, Wade, Dirk, Kobe, etc.) still in their prime. I mean the guy is really good but he's had to do too much for his teams throughout his career.

All that being said, Chris Paul has never been clutch in the playoffs either. Too man key turnovers and bad offensive decisions in key moments. He's a tremendous player but I think he has a mental block in regard to believing how good he actually is, which is why I think he freezes in big moments. And now, with his age, I think his window has closed as a first option.
 
Top