I didn't say this breh
Let's back it up a bit. I started by taking issue with your assertion that if it took someone 10 years to save downpayment money ($40k...which is 16% of 250k, not 20%, but we'll roll with it), then they can't afford a $250k house. I said that wasn't necessarily true at all and that you couldn't make such a statement without knowing how much they were paying for rent.
For a $250k house with $40k down, a 4.5% fixed rate on a 30 year mortgage with a 1% tax rate, you're looking at a payment of about $1300 for principal/taxes/interest. So if they're already paying rent of at least $1k/month and saving $333/month on top of that to come up with the downpayment, then they can afford that house.
If they pay less then they may not be able to afford that house, but the point is you can't make that general statement. At least $1k/month is pretty common. I only brought up the $2k example cuz at that amount it's clear they can afford the mortgage, but still may struggle to come up with the downpayment.
in the scenario we were talking about the car payment was a barrier and used as an example of extra money they could be saving. in order to get a down payment on a home. Sombody who is paying 2K a month for rent for the hell of it,could easily have saved up for the downpayment 3 times as fast if they wanted to,they are taking 10 years by choice in your scenario. The person in your example is stunting to if they are paying 2K for rent but can barely afford to save 300 a month. Your scenario isn't very realistic and completely changes the scenario we were talking about with the car payment. If they are paying 2K for rent when they could be paying 1K,the car payment isn't the problem at all in that scenario anymore. They could actually be saving about 1200-1400 a month instead of 300$..
I made the assumption that if the car payment is what should be sacrificed for extra money,the person doesn't have any areas where they could cut down to get money that would equate to the car payment.
But still in all this person can't afford that house

. What you are arguing is the problem with alot of people buying houses. Yes you are right,technically the person CAN afford that house at 1300. But they still can't really afford that house and should be looking elsewhere,especially in that 1K scenario.
But lets give this person the 2300 a month total and be generous. They are paying 1300 for rent,lets say 100 for car insurance, 150 for utilities,100 for groceries,50 dollars a month for gas,100 on the phone bill. If my math is correct we are at 1800 a month if you live bear bones minimum for about 30 years. But lets be realistic and say the person wants to actually go out,drive places other than to and from work,maybe have a pet,buy some actual good groceries,live a little. Lets say they only spend about 200$ a months on extras. Now they are at 2000 a month. They are back to only being able to save a extra 300$ a month,couldn't take a car payment on if you needed to now

Your supposed to have 6 months worth of rent and living expenses in your savings. Hope nothing goes wrong in that year or two it will take for them to save that up. Hope they don't ever need a car payment to get back and forth to work so they don't get fired.
I'm just saying,these are scenarios many people don't think about,because they only think about what they technically can afford. Plus this isn't ideal for wealth building whatsoever which is what black people need to be worried about when we are behind,and are lucky if we don't start out in the red in our communities. Guess that isn't as important as taking pics for the gram with your feet up on that big nice patio
