that's a very dumb way of thinking and the media knows how to manipulate people into believing something
the sayings if say a lie long enough people will believe it
never mind the fact that one of these many accusers admitted to lying
100 people can accuse you of something, if there is zero evidence you can't say someone is guilty
all these accusers and they wait until recent years to get at cosby, at least one of them should've made this an issue in the 70's at least the 80s
You are making assumptions, doggy. Where did I say i automatically think you are guilty? We are talking about the "benefit of a doubt"
WHen many accusers accuse you im not saying i start believing them but it gives me a reason to NOT give you the benefit of a doubt. That in NO WAY means i think you are guilty.
I dont know Bill Cosby any more than I do these women. NEITHER, DO YOU.
Sure i understand that he's a celebrity and will have a target on his back at all times but based n these accusations, while i may remain cool with him (if i knew him), I dont think Im letting him near my wife alone at a party. At the same time im not gonna tell people he did it either.
I always take my own sister as an example inthese things: Everyone that I know has some sort of beef with my sister. She's great with/to me. But it gets to a point that either everyone is wrong and you're right or everyone is wright and you're wrong. I studied engineering. My daily experiences have me in the mindset that chances of a single point of failure causing an issue is more likely to happen than multiple culprits suddently surfacing.
Again, this is about "benefit of a doubt". I feel the same way about Michael jackson, BTW. I LOOOOVE the man and his music but not leaving my kids near him. Im not saying throw him in jail either.