the cac mamba
Veteran
fukk that: how do they explain neanderthals?
christianity
christianity
How Do Religious People Explain Dinosaurs ?
- Thread starter PRO BADA$$
- Start date
@Chez Lopez school and these heathens
KinksandCoils
African American Queen
oh well u would have to ask one of those people who believe the earth is only 6000 yrs old.
The same way they explain genetic drift, plasmids, and string theory 
They are also god's creatures
Detroit Wave
Veteran
Religous people lack the critical thinking skills required for science and to think for themselves 
Fart Knocker
Superstar
its easy for them to explain. that old cac with the white hair and white beard created them based off of a mosquito stuck in sap or something that he now has on top of his cane
MoeDollaZ$
Well Damn!
Relgious people are brainwashed
PRO BADA$$
http://www.nextmanup.co/
The same way scientist explain them.
they existed. they are extinct. They were here before humans. They aren't here now. They were large.
scientists have evidence tho
Chez Lopez
Neo-Abolitionist
lol.
The bible, as well as many 'mythological' sources, including ancient hindu, ancient norse, ancient egyptian and ancient greek, ancient chinese, ancient aboriginal, ancient maya etc all speak of dinosaurs in the context of dragons. The difference between the two beings, both large lizard like animals, is negligible. The book of job and the book of isaiah describe a creature named leviathan, identical to dinosaurs, as being 'cheif in the creations of God', which means that these type of creatures are the strongest, largest creations of Yahuah. These large reptile-esqe creatures are omnipresent in the ancient world, regardless of location, time period or religious affiliation. Every society in the ancient era speaks of these creatures coexisting with mankind. Modern scholarship will point to the existence of dinosaurs and man as being 64 million years seperated, but the evidence proves this grossly inflated number of years as impossible.
Paleantologists discern the 64 million year hypothesis from two methods of research. Researchers use 'strata' or stratified rock layers in order to determine what 'era of prehistory' dinosaurs emerge from. Lacking any stratified rock in an excavation area, researchers then use the fossils themselves, and match species to other species in order to determine these findinds. The problem with this line of reason is clear, the dinosaurs will verify the time of strata, and the strata will verify the time of dinosaur. Neither is exclusive, they depend on eachother for verification, which makes a circluar conclusion. If the dinosaur verifies the time of the strata, and the strata verifies the time of the dinosaur, then they are both wrong.
What we find is that the formation of strata is also a false interpretation. This comes from the discovery of 'poly strate fossils', fossils which bissect layers of strata which represent millions of years in a geographic timeline as previously assumed. It is very common to find plantlife, trees, and even animal remains that stand straight up, through what was assumed to be layers of sedimentary rock, built up over millions of years. so how can a tree grow for millions of years straight through solid rock? Paleobotonists and researchers have struggled to find solutions to this problem, but it is simple. The reason trees are standing up in these formations is because they were never representative of millions of years, or hundreds of thousands of years, or even one hundred years. These strata were formed instantly, by a succession of catastrophic events. Like a flood.
Sediment layers are created by more than one method of geology. Catastrophic events often radically change the geologic environment in a rapid succession, rather than a gradual, time consuming method. The erruption of mount st helens proves this fact, upon examination of the soot and build up of volcanic material, it was found that the differing layers of volacnic ash, mixed with rock mixed with fallout and magma all created stratified rocky formations which coincide to what geologists would assumeto be millions of years of geographic 'evolution'. This process only took two years to form. Similarly a world wide flood would cause VERY similar effects, as sediment layers from rushing water circled the earth, large swathes of layer, after layer, after layer would accumulate, in radically shorter time periods than previously assumed. The poly strate fossils are easily explained, as this same process is seen today with tsunamis, mudslides, earthquakes and erruptions all instantly creating layers of debris, which in turn will create layers of rock IDENTICAL to strata used to date dinosaur fossils.
Dinosaurs, identical to what skeletal remains exhibit are cross culturally verified as coexisting with humans, the dating methods used by scientists to generate the 'millions of years' hypothesis are found to be critically flawed, but the most damning evidence comes from the fossils themselves, which have been found to have remnants of red blood cells. In the year 2005 a scientist discovered traces of red blood cells found inside the bone marrow of a dinosaur said to be extinct for millions of years. Even under extreme, fossilized states, how can tissue samples remain after millions of years? the researcher herself cannot explain the finding without jumping to extremely careless and unfounded conclusions. The cells were found because the animal did not die millions of years ago, red blood cells or any component of living tissue, will decay within at the most 500 years, stretching the life of the tissue out as far as possible. The only possible conclusion is that the creature died in recent times, not prehistoric.
in conclusion, based on all available data, contemporary and ancient, scientific and sociologic, dinosaurs are proven to be dragons. Upon realizing this its almost ridiculous to think otherwise.
triplehate
Superstar
So dinosaurs aren't old?
scientists have evidence tho
Everyone has access to the same evidence. Most of the people who first discovered all this shyt were
religious.
for Thousands of years random fossils were discovered. Then for hundreds of years educated scientist were finding them all over the Earth. The man Gideon who first began the actual scientific study of dinosaurs was taught in a religious school.
I believe the battle between science and spirituality is a figment of lame atheist imaginations..........
