How do we feel about time control/travel technology?

NkrumahWasRight Is Wrong

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
46,332
Reputation
5,976
Daps
94,043
Reppin
Uncertain grounds
I was listening to this old Art Bell interview with Dr. David Lewis Anderson from 2002 and he was dropping crazy knowledge on time control fields and the possibility of time travel. The beginning is open calls (which is always good fukkery)..then he goes into it heavy with legit physics and a description of his project. Ignore the John Titor labeling..hes not involved at all.



One caller (not Anderson) at the 6:40 mark or so claimed to be from a different dimension. He's 99.99% chance to be a loon but it was amusing. He was outlining the differences between the dimensions..from his..the South won the Civil War..Mason Dixon line held...Lincoln resigned..The North took Canada and the South took Mexico and down to Panama...According to his "dimension/timeline",(13:00) Robert E. Lee allowed slaves to buy their freedom and either go to Liberia or stay here..but move out of their originally enslaved state and go to the newly annexed Mexico :russ:

Anyway onto the Anderson interview, hes legit I promise :whoa:...(33:00)...The science starts popping around the 57:00 mark.

Cliffs:
  • Giant rotating bodies can twist space-time around them.
  • Gravity itself can dilate/twist space-time through frame dragging
  • Time-Warp Field Generator is his technology from then. (1:03:00)
    • Discovered a coupling between time and different forms of energy
    • Antenna configuration (7m high)
    • Introduced a rotating electro magnetic field..generator injects a gas reagent that pumps in energy
    • 12 high powered lasers to excite the gas reagent around the core to open up the field (that warps time)
    • The field created is an area within space (spherical field) where time rates will pass slower or faster depending on how they set it up.
    • Time can pass up to 3x faster within the field (1 hr past outside of the field = 3 hrs in the field) or slow down time up to around 35%.
    • In 1997-1998 :damn:, first experiment was with reference clocks..clock in the field (both mechanical and electronic) went faster or slower than the reference clock.
    • Sometimes the visual (with the doppler effect) shifts out of the visible spectrum but don't actually disappear. :damn:1:16:00
Theres much more in the interview with good explanations. Another physicist actually calls in to the show and asks questions around 1:50:00..she talks about squiz interfaces and shyt (idk wtf that is)(and they link up for work! lol)

This is his website: Time Control Technologies and Methods

time-control-technologies-and-methods.jpg


He worked as a scientist in the Air Force. This is the technology he was specifically outlining in the interview Time-warped Field Time Travel:

time-warped-fields-overview.jpg


As general relativity predicts, rotating bodies drag spacetime around themselves in a phenomenon referred to as frame-dragging. This rotational frame-dragging effect is also known as the Lense-Thirring effect. The rotation of an object alters space and time, dragging a nearby object out of position compared to the predictions of Newtonian physics. The predicted effect is small—about one part in a few trillion.

However, as Dr. David Lewis Anderson proposed in 1987 with his announcement of time-warped field theory, the difference in potential energy between two different areas of twisted spacetime due to frame-dragging is significantly large. Even the smallest twist in spacetime contains enormous energy potential and can be used to create containable and controllable fields of close-timelike curves without the need for significant input power. This makes both forward and reverse time control possible within the limits of technology today.

Frame Dragging Effect Basics
inertial-frame-dragging-energy-potential.jpg

The Anderson Time Reactor operates by accessing the high energy
potential and effects, existing across two regions of twisted spacetime,
to create containable and controllable fields of closed-timelike curves.
Rotational frame-dragging appears in the general principle of relativity and similar theories in the vicinity of rotating massive objects. Under this effect, the frame of reference in which a clock ticks the fastest is one which is rotating around the object as viewed by a distant observer. This also means that light traveling in the direction of rotation of the object will move around the object faster than light moving against the rotation as seen by a distant observer. It is now the best-known effect, partly thanks to the Gravity Probe B experiment.

Linear frame dragging is the similarly inevitable result of the general principle of relativity, applied to linear momentum. Although it arguably has equal theoretical legitimacy to the "rotational" effect, the difficulty of obtaining an experimental verification of the effect means that it receives much less discussion and is often omitted from articles on frame-dragging

Static mass increase is another effect. The effect is an increase in inertia of a body when other masses are placed nearby. While not strictly a frame dragging effect, it is also derived from the same equation of general relativity. It is a tiny effect that is difficult to confirm experimentally.
Mathematical Derivation of Frame Dragging
Frame-dragging may be illustrated most readily using the Kerr metric, which describes the geometry of spacetime in the vicinity of a mass M rotating with angular momentum J

twf-001.gif

twf-002.gif


where rs is the Schwarzschild radius

twf-003.gif


and where the following shorthand variables have been introduced for brevity

twf-004.gif


In the non-relativistic limit where M (or, equivalently, rs) goes to zero, the Kerr metric becomes the orthogonal metric for the oblate spheroidal coordinates

twf-005.gif


We may re-write the Kerr metric in the following form

twf-006.gif


This metric is equivalent to a co-rotating reference frame that is rotating with angular speed Ω that depends on both the radius r and the colatitude θ

twf-007.gif


In the plane of the equator this simplifies to:

twf-008.gif


Thus, an inertial reference frame is entrained by the rotating central mass to participate in the latter's rotation; this is frame-dragging. Frame-dragging occurs about every rotating mass and at every radius r and colatitude θ.

Anyone with a science/mathematics background here to look at the above? I cant decipher that shyt at all. :mjlol:
 

NkrumahWasRight Is Wrong

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
46,332
Reputation
5,976
Daps
94,043
Reppin
Uncertain grounds
I didn't watch this interview. Briefly explain why a "time warp" field is not pseudoscience

I put up the science and equations behind what he was saying..and this was from 2002. I think I read somewhere online that there is a patent listed for his work. Who knows what he actually has now.

Its kind of foreign to me since I am not well versed in science so I cant really say much. It does sound like pseudoscience but its not like the powers that be would ever let this technology go commercial or public anyway. He worked as a scientist in the Air Force and wasnt a kook in the interview. You have to suspend your belief a little to truly get with it because it sounds outlandish but who knows what the government has in their black budget programs.

Anyway, I do think time travel is possible and that would make this time warping thing possible too and way easier to do in a vacuum.
 

Leasy

Let's add some Alizarin Crimson & Van Dyke Brown
Supporter
Joined
Jun 17, 2012
Messages
46,948
Reputation
4,785
Daps
104,423
Reppin
Philly (BYRD GANG)
The amount of energy needed is unnecessary and worthless. According to our galaxy two objects can't occupy space at the same time. If we have access to time travel, what would happen to the present individual and the individual traveling to the past????

How would this affect the universal movement and star movement. In time travel we have to not think about it in Earth sense but universal.
 

NkrumahWasRight Is Wrong

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
46,332
Reputation
5,976
Daps
94,043
Reppin
Uncertain grounds
The amount of energy needed is unnecessary and worthless. According to our galaxy two objects can't occupy space at the same time. If we have access to time travel, what would happen to the present individual and the individual traveling to the past????

How would this affect the universal movement and star movement. In time travel we have to not think about it in Earth sense but universal.

Can you reword that? Not sure if im understanding it correctly. Fwiw, the scientist postulated that he could only slow the rate of time not reverse it.
 

Leasy

Let's add some Alizarin Crimson & Van Dyke Brown
Supporter
Joined
Jun 17, 2012
Messages
46,948
Reputation
4,785
Daps
104,423
Reppin
Philly (BYRD GANG)
Can you reword that? Not sure if im understanding it correctly. Fwiw, the scientist postulated that he could only slow the rate of time not reverse it.

Sorry what I am stating is that what would happen to the person that is traveling to the past and their present self??? We all know two object/energies can't occupy space at the same time. It is either you will leave present forever and go to the past.

What is the purpose of slowing time down and how is that possible when time is dictated by the universe.
 

NkrumahWasRight Is Wrong

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
46,332
Reputation
5,976
Daps
94,043
Reppin
Uncertain grounds
Sorry what I am stating is that what would happen to the person that is traveling to the past and their present self??? We all know two object/energies can't occupy space at the same time. It is either you will leave present forever and go to the past.

What is the purpose of slowing time down and how is that possible when time is dictated by the universe.

I am far from an expert..just hypothesizing..

1. Part of that problem I think goes to why you might not be able to go back in time to a former self..but its the same space at the same time. One could also argue that you could do it anyway and it would just be as if it is two different people. Its clearly not based on simple genetics. I do believe that traveling back in time might be possible theoretically if you could sync it up with the current reference rate of time. For instance..if someone traveled to the future and spent ten minutes there..then traveled back to ten minutes ahead of when you left then it could work. It truly depends on if time is truly linear or not..and the effect of dimensions. Imagine going to the future and coming back to the wrong timeline/dimension..:francis: Anderson said it was theoretically possible to go back in time but it would be extremely extremely difficult.

A central problem with time travel to the past is the violation of causality; should an effect precede its cause, it would give rise to the possibility of temporal paradox. Some interpretations of time travel resolve this by accepting the possibility of travel between parallel realities or universes.

Theory would point toward there having to be a physical dimension in which one could travel to, where the present (i.e. the point that which you are leaving) would be present at a point fixed in either the past or future. This concept is often referred to as a multiverse.



:manny:
2. Slowing time down or speeding it up could have good impact on medical treatments :ehh: And I think what he is saying is that time is all relative to what space you inhabit and its energetic environment.
 

EndDomination

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Jun 22, 2014
Messages
31,857
Reputation
7,427
Daps
111,963
David Lewis Anderson is some weird fraud, the Art Bell show is an even weirder haven for the fraudulent.
I can't find any of this guy's credentials online.

His bio is: David Lewis Anderson, born in Weirton, West Virginia is a physicist whose interests are in spacetime physics, special relativity and global community service. Anderson received multiple degrees, graduating with honors in the fiels of engineering, physics and philosophy.
He was employed at a young age by the United States Air Force conducting advanced research and development at the prestigious Air Force Flight Test Center at Edwards Air Force Base in the Mojave Desert. He later founded an organization call the TTRC, an advanced time-technology research laboratory located on Long Island, New York in the United States of America.


Spelling mistake included, no proof of military service, no schools listed, nothing.
 
Last edited:

NkrumahWasRight Is Wrong

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
46,332
Reputation
5,976
Daps
94,043
Reppin
Uncertain grounds
David Lewis Anderson is some weird fraud, the Art Bell show is an even weirder haven for the fraudulent.
I can't find any of this guy's credentials online.

His bio is: David Lewis Anderson, born in Weirton, West Virginia is a physicist whose interests are in spacetime physics, special relativity and global community service. Anderson received multiple degrees, graduating with honors in the fiels of engineering, physics and philosophy.
He was employed at a young age by the United States Air Force conducting advanced research and development at the prestigious Air Force Flight Test Center at Edwards Air Force Base in the Mojave Desert. He later founded an organization call the TTRC, an advanced time-technology research laboratory located on Long Island, New York in the United States of America.


Spelling mistake included, no proof of military service, no schools listed, nothing.

Art bell is definitely fringe but whateva. Just wanted to get a discussion outside of politics :hubie:
 
Top