I feel like Deja vu proves this is a simulation. It's like a program running the same over and over again while learning for variation.




No, the shyt would have crashed a couple of times by now.
Bigger "random" acts would happen as well. Like a great shark mysteriously found in the intersection streets of Lincoln, Nebraska type random.
Bigger "random" acts would happen as well. Like a great shark mysteriously found in the intersection streets of Lincoln, Nebraska type random.

How would we know if we are the program. You think windows knows who coded it?Who made the program?
How do you know?No, the shyt would have crashed a couple of times by now.
Bigger "random" acts would happen as well. Like a great shark mysteriously found in the intersection streets of Lincoln, Nebraska type random.
I feel like Deja vu proves this is a simulation. It's like a program running the same over and over again while learning for variation.
wordActually everything in science says we live in a simulation.
The double-slit experiment, "spooky" action at a distance, wave/particle duality, the measurement problem, the delayed choice quantum eraser experiment, etc.
All those experiments and concepts in quantum mechanics make zero sense in an objective reality. However, in a simulation they make perfect sense.
Things are way too seamless. The power needed to produce such a simulation would not be without it's obvious faults at some point.How do you know?