How Do You Assert Dominance On Your bytches?

[blackzeus]

I would say its more about who you are than any particular tactic. Honestly, I have to chuckle at dudes who really believe they can make a woman "submissive" via sex. Yes, she will "submit" for awhile, until she gets what she wants, but then she'll go back to normal. People submit as a tactic....submission is a way of being and you cannot garner submission from your woman via busting a nut.

The way that I have observed/experienced to have the most effect is simply having rules and regulations for yourself and your woman i.e. integrity. I call it standing on principle....concrete feet and wooden legs. When a woman knows that you expect her to "be" a certain way and that you'll be single before you date someone who isn't "being" that way, then that is more powerful than a temporary nut.

Here's the stone cold truth, very few men stand on principle when it comes to women. So, when a woman meets a dude who can look her in the eye and explain what he wants, how he wants it and how he expects his woman to be AND THEN stand on that with no hesitation, it creates a level of respect in the interaction. And at the end of the day, submission is about respect...a high level of respect that is esoteric and intrinsic.

Peace

I highly, HIGHLY disagree with that statement. You can have 0 integrity, and put your mark on your women physically, and still assert your dominance and control her. Vice versa doesn't work. There's a lot of high integrity "stand on principle" dudes whose women cheated on them with the janitor who d*cked them down properly. There's just no other way. Her losing physical control of her body puts a stamp in her brain that's not going to be replaced by your explanations

 

[Just like bruddas]

by not calling her a bytch.

 

[C-NICE]

most of the stuff has been said but i'd like to add on being a guy of few words. I see most these 2014 dudes doing a lot of arguing when i look at my pops and grandpops they never said things more than once and if they did it was a problem. After you lay that foundation down you have to be a MAN who demands what you say goes. If a b!tch can't do what i say or what i ask its a big problem and she knows that.So be mysterious when needed and be a man of principles.

 

[Mr. Somebody]

First of all i dont refer to my wife as a b word..

A B-word is a female dog and any woman you care about should not be referred to as an animal.

Secondly, if you are a man, a real man, a woman will respect your leadership and follow your lead. War with the demonic realm requires a leader. If revelations began today, and you were out in the demonic realm with no protection of any kind, would you be following your woman or would she expect you to be the General, for your survival.

 

[bigmac]

lol @ thinking there is a recipe for the shyt as long as you establish the bytch easily replaceable (not verbally) if she act up then you good

Underrated post.

 

[mcdivit85]

I highly, HIGHLY disagree with that statement. You can have 0 integrity, and put your mark on your women physically, and still assert your dominance and control her. Vice versa doesn't work. There's a lot of high integrity "stand on principle" dudes whose women cheated on them with the janitor who d*cked them down properly. There's just no other way. Her losing physical control of her body puts a stamp in her brain that's not going to be replaced by your explanations

Whatever you say, playa. I do not concur but you already know that. What you intimate is gigaloish....gigalos don't receive submission, they receive trinkets for good performance....like a dog receives a treat for catching a frisby.

You're not using integrity correctly nor are you using it in the proper context of my statement. Integrity is many times falsely linked to "being a good guy", which is not the case. Integrity simply means standing behind one's own ideas and principles regardless. So, a inhumane person could be integrous and a "good guy" could not. And like I said, most men are not in the face of women.

My thing is, if your woman's submission is based on how well you banged her out the night before, then that's not true submission. That's some Baby Boy sh#t. Any man that needs to make his woman's toes curl in order to get a sandwich is a lost soul.

The only thing I would partly agree with is the "vice versa doesn't work." It doesn't work if you don't have the mental fortitude and the ability to communicate ideas(mouthpiece) in order capture a woman's imagination and respect. That's not to say the physical portion is not a part of the interaction, but it is not the basis for submission. True submission is based on a woman's appreciation for the TYPE OF MAN she's with....not ONLY from the type of sex she's receiving. If that were the case, black women would be the most submissive women on the face of the planet based on sexual repuation/performance of their counterpart alone.

Besides that half a point, I stand by what I said because I know it to be so.

Peace

 

[blackzeus]

Whatever you say, playa. I do not concur but you already know that. What you intimate is gigaloish....gigalos don't receive submission, they receive trinkets for good performance....like a dog receives a treat for catching a frisby.

You're not using integrity correctly nor are you using it in the proper context of my statement. Integrity is many times falsely linked to "being a good guy", which is not the case. Integrity simply means standing behind one's own ideas and principles regardless. So, a inhumane person could be integrous and a "good guy" could not. And like I said, most men are not in the face of women.

My thing is, if your woman's submission is based on how well you banged her out the night before, then that's not true submission. That's some Baby Boy sh#t. Any man that needs to make his woman's toes curl in order to get a sandwich is a lost soul.

The only thing I would partly agree with is the "vice versa doesn't work." It doesn't work if you don't have the mental fortitude and the ability to communicate ideas(mouthpiece) in order capture a woman's imagination and respect. That's not to say the physical portion is not a part of the interaction, but it is not the basis for submission. True submission is based on a woman's appreciation for the TYPE OF MAN she's with....not ONLY from the type of sex she's receiving. If that were the case, black women would be the most submissive women on the face of the planet based on sexual repuation/performance of their counterpart alone.

Besides that half a point, I stand by what I said because I know it to be so.

Peace

Your philosophy works well with women on a higher mental level, who appreciate you specifically for who are you, whether you're in a wheelchair or jumpin' out the gym like Lebron, because of your mind. The practicality of your post is status though, because that's like 1% of women. The bolded takes the man out of the equation. So if the women appreciates you, she's going to be submissive? Not only is that a fallacy in itself (lots of black women and women in general appreciate their man but still bark at 'em ), the thread wasn't about submission of women, it's about how to assert your dominance. And your suggestion by asserting dominance is to get her to appreciate you as a man, mentally, by standing on your principles and ideas. Who are you breh, Leave it to Beaver?

 

[Nick Barnes]

Showing them a little respect is a good start.

 

[the cac mamba]

this is gonna be around for a while

 

[Grizz]

I've been in an relationship coming up too 3 years now and sex never gets old. The moment when you turn a innocent girl into a freak that's when you've made an impact.
Now sex aside a lot of women will look up to men who have a strong head on their shoulders and she'll be yours no matter what. Think about it this way, the moment she says 'I'm here for you whatever you do in life' actually translate 'You can do whatever you want in life but I want to be in YOURS'.

 

[mcdivit85]

Your philosophy works well with women on a higher mental level, who appreciate you specifically for who are you, whether you're in a wheelchair or jumpin' out the gym like Lebron, because of your mind. The practicality of your post is status though, because that's like 1% of women. The bolded takes the man out of the equation. So if the women appreciates you, she's going to be submissive? Not only is that a fallacy in itself (lots of black women and women in general appreciate their man but still bark at 'em ), the thread wasn't about submission of women, it's about how to assert your dominance. And your suggestion by asserting dominance is to get her to appreciate you as a man, mentally, by standing on your principles and ideas. Who are you breh, Leave it to Beaver?

I feel ya, playa. I assumed by asserting dominance, the discussion was about submission. Not physical dominance, which is redundant to even have a discussion about that concerning men to women.

If playing the Mandingo role works for you, then congratulations. Chicks need someone to play that role....keeps their confidence high.

You can call me Leave it to Beaver if you like, I know what I say is true for a fact. But here's the cold part, I also know what you say is some tender d#ck, sucka sh#t too.

But carry on, playa.

Peace

 

[blackslash]

Breh, I agree with your post, but you can be trained, as I was. Why lie, I was brought up in a Christian household, and was taught to treat women with respect and to consider their feelings. All that went out the window the first 2 months I moved out the crib. All that soft lovey dovey sh*t will have you broke and/or crying your heart out. Women crave dominance. They want their brains f*cked out, and someone to tell them what to do, to guide them. Everything else is for the birds.

Funny thing is...I learned to treat chicks im talking to like this from seeing things in a
Christian perspective..

U a man u lead that woman b...

Not to flex or stroke ur ego but women are emotional creatures and we needa be that man that leads them out they folly and also leads them in the partnership

And brehs, make sure u make that characteristic translate itself in the sack...they love dat sht

 

[Poitier]

Funny thing is...I learned to treat chicks im talking to like this from seeing things in a
Christian perspective..

U a man u lead that woman b...

Not to flex to stroke ur ego but women are emotional creatures and we needa be that man that leads them out they folly and also leads them in the partnership

And brehs, make sure u make that characteristic translate itself in the sack...they love dat sht

Go back to the Booth nikka

 

[blackslash]

Go back to the Booth nikka

*sees a pic of yung thug in yo avi*

*remembers that most of a posts are dedicated to defending fakkits*


Ya we have nothing to talk about

 

[blackslash]

Whatever you say, playa. I do not concur but you already know that. What you intimate is gigaloish....gigalos don't receive submission, they receive trinkets for good performance....like a dog receives a treat for catching a frisby.

You're not using integrity correctly nor are you using it in the proper context of my statement. Integrity is many times falsely linked to "being a good guy", which is not the case. Integrity simply means standing behind one's own ideas and principles regardless. So, a inhumane person could be integrous and a "good guy" could not. And like I said, most men are not in the face of women.

My thing is, if your woman's submission is based on how well you banged her out the night before, then that's not true submission. That's some Baby Boy sh#t. Any man that needs to make his woman's toes curl in order to get a sandwich is a lost soul.

The only thing I would partly agree with is the "vice versa doesn't work." It doesn't work if you don't have the mental fortitude and the ability to communicate ideas(mouthpiece) in order capture a woman's imagination and respect. That's not to say the physical portion is not a part of the interaction, but it is not the basis for submission. True submission is based on a woman's appreciation for the TYPE OF MAN she's with....not ONLY from the type of sex she's receiving. If that were the case, black women would be the most submissive women on the face of the planet based on sexual repuation/performance of their counterpart alone.

Besides that half a point, I stand by what I said because I know it to be so.

Peace

You get it my nikka