you can replace college coaches with high school coaches and not much would change. try replacing these top college athletes and see how watchable these games are
are u sure about this statement?
you can replace college coaches with high school coaches and not much would change. try replacing these top college athletes and see how watchable these games are
are u sure with this statement?
first of all nikkas need to shut up talkin dat they poor shyt cuz them nikkas is superstars in most of they towns all they gotta do is ask the right people
i understand lettin them make outside money they should be able to but imagine nikkas would be hundred thousanaires in college
plus not every nikka that famous but trust every football/basketball player get taken care of
it would cause too much trouble imo but i do understand where nikkas comin from let em make money but y'all gotta think big imo
coaches make million and assistant coaches get 6 figure salaries. if theres gonna be issues regardless, let the people who actually generate the money get paid.
you can replace college coaches with high school coaches and not much would change. try replacing these top college athletes and see how watchable these games are
It would create a dramatically uneven field. Think, for example, if cats who got accepted to USC could now start partying and making money with the Hollywood elite. They'd be in movies, shows, etc. Kids would want to flock there even more than they do now. Having rules in place that are unilateral is in the best spirit of amateurism, not allowing teams to gain unique advantages.I dont see the big deal.
How does it hurt the school or ncaa if a college athlete makes money off of his/her name?
It would create a dramatically uneven field. Think, for example, if cats who got accepted to USC could now start partying and making money with the Hollywood elite. They'd be in movies, shows, etc. Kids would want to flock there even more than they do now. Having rules in place that are unilateral is in the best spirit of amateurism, not allowing teams to gain unique advantages.
I agree with you. At the same time, the imbalance would be even worse if there were no rules set in place whatsoever. Oregon has a loophole with Mr. Knight providing all the goodies.
Have you seen the new Oregon facilities? Schools like USC and the Florida schools with weather, tradition,and bytches to offer clearly have a unique advantage and will always have said advantage. Keeping kids from profiting off their image while the schools and NCAA as a whole rake in money hand over fist has absolutely nothing to do with amateurism or competitive balance. If you are gonna limit what kids can do, then everybody should be limited. No Johnny Football Jerseys or T-Shirts. No Networks. No TV deals. No multi-million dollar deals or endorsements for coaches. Let's keep this thing within the spirit amateurism.![]()
Its already uneven.It would create a dramatically uneven field. Think, for example, if cats who got accepted to USC could now start partying and making money with the Hollywood elite. They'd be in movies, shows, etc. Kids would want to flock there even more than they do now. Having rules in place that are unilateral is in the best spirit of amateurism, not allowing teams to gain unique advantages.
I agree with you. At the same time, the imbalance would be even worse if there were no rules set in place whatsoever. Oregon has a loophole with Mr. Knight providing all the goodies.
Picture this -- tomorrow Phil Knight has a press release and says "every Oregon football player will make $100,000 next season".![]()
nothing. I was half asleep and ramblingWhat's that gotta do with every college football player having the ability to go out and make money off of his own likeness/name? People always try to bring it back to paying the players when that isn't the issue here.