Caring about your countries demise now makes you a trump supporter
like I said if you lived in canada the past decade you'd be voting for the other party as well
HOW MANY COLI CANADIANS VOTED FOR PIERRE POILIEVRE?
- Thread starter Sir Richard Spirit
- Start date
Caring about your countries demise now makes you a trump supporter
like I said if you lived in canada the past decade you'd be voting for the other party as well
Sir Richard Spirit
Superstar
dude was appealing to canadian maga fans
Commented on Tue Apr 29 02:20:53 2025 UTC
It’s not so much a liberal win as much as it was a conservative loss.
The cons were leading for months but their response to the current US administration was perceived as way softer and weaker than the liberals response. Trump openly backing the conservatives in our election really put the nail in the coffin for the conservatives here.
It’s not so much a liberal win as much as it was a conservative loss.
The cons were leading for months but their response to the current US administration was perceived as way softer and weaker than the liberals response. Trump openly backing the conservatives in our election really put the nail in the coffin for the conservatives here.
│
│
│ Commented on Tue Apr 29 02:26:27 2025 UTC
│
│ Also had Pollieve come out to condemn the 51st state rhetoric it could have swung very differently. He waited to see which way the wind was blowing and I think that cost him the most.
│
│ Edit. I said condone incorrectly.
│
│
│ Also had Pollieve come out to condemn the 51st state rhetoric it could have swung very differently. He waited to see which way the wind was blowing and I think that cost him the most.
│
│ Edit. I said condone incorrectly.
│
│ │
│ │
│ │ Commented on Tue Apr 29 02:30:51 2025 UTC
│ │
│ │ Case in point Doug Ford came out swinging against Trump and he was handed the province again.
│ │
│ │
│ │ Case in point Doug Ford came out swinging against Trump and he was handed the province again.
│ │
│ │ │
│ │ │
│ │ │ Commented on Tue Apr 29 02:36:12 2025 UTC
│ │ │
│ │ │ Yeah exactly, he could have pulled a Ford and it would have easily been a Conservatives majority, but they fumbled so hard while the Liberals took full advantage, and well, guess we're seeing the results.
│ │ │
│ │ │
│ │ │ Yeah exactly, he could have pulled a Ford and it would have easily been a Conservatives majority, but they fumbled so hard while the Liberals took full advantage, and well, guess we're seeing the results.
│ │ │
│ │ │ │
│ │ │ │
│ │ │ │ Commented on Tue Apr 29 02:42:37 2025 UTC
│ │ │ │
│ │ │ │ To be fair, many conservatives follow the ideals of trump so they are not going to push back.
│ │ │ │
│ │ │ │
│ │ │ │ To be fair, many conservatives follow the ideals of trump so they are not going to push back.
│ │ │ │
│ │ │ │ │
│ │ │ │ │
│ │ │ │ │ Commented on Tue Apr 29 02:45:55 2025 UTC
│ │ │ │ │
│ │ │ │ │ So many Conservatives caught wearing MAGA hats, combined with slogans like Canada First made it very hard to present themselves as strong opposition to Trump.
│ │ │ │ │
│ │ │ │ │
│ │ │ │ │ So many Conservatives caught wearing MAGA hats, combined with slogans like Canada First made it very hard to present themselves as strong opposition to Trump.
│ │ │ │ │
│ │ │ │ │ │
│ │ │ │ │ │
│ │ │ │ │ │ Commented on Tue Apr 29 04:31:41 2025 UTC
│ │ │ │ │ │
│ │ │ │ │ │ Trying to promote your nationalism by co-opting another country’s nationalism seems like somewhat of the opposite of how nationalism works lol
│ │ │ │ │ │
│ │ │ │ │ │
│ │ │ │ │ │ Trying to promote your nationalism by co-opting another country’s nationalism seems like somewhat of the opposite of how nationalism works lol
│ │ │ │ │ │
│ │ │ │ │ │ │
│ │ │ │ │ │ │
│ │ │ │ │ │ │ Commented on Tue Apr 29 11:14:36 2025 UTC
│ │ │ │ │ │ │
│ │ │ │ │ │ │ Promoting your own stupidity by co-opting another country's stupidity tracks though, so there's no issue.
│ │ │ │ │ │ │
│ │ │ │ │ │ │
│ │ │ │ │ │ │ Promoting your own stupidity by co-opting another country's stupidity tracks though, so there's no issue.
│ │ │ │ │ │ │
Commented on Tue Apr 29 08:59:43 2025 UTC
Pierre Poilievre will be remembered as the guy who went from a projected landslide majority to losing not only the election but also his own seat that he previously held for 20 years in just four months.
Truly a historic fumble.
Pierre Poilievre will be remembered as the guy who went from a projected landslide majority to losing not only the election but also his own seat that he previously held for 20 years in just four months.
Truly a historic fumble.
│
│
│ Commented on Tue Apr 29 09:09:16 2025 UTC
│
│ Thank you Trump
│
│
│ Thank you Trump
│
│ │
│ │
│ │ Commented on Tue Apr 29 09:19:31 2025 UTC
│ │
│ │ Trump played a part, but this is on Pierre. All he had to do was stand up for Canada at the right moment but that's the one thing he could not do, because it's not who he is. Or he could have adapted his message. His whole platform was was "axe the tax", "fukk Trudeau", and "woke". The Liberals fixed two of those things themselves, and the third is just not palatable to Canadians. But that's all he had to run on.
│ │
│ │
│ │ Trump played a part, but this is on Pierre. All he had to do was stand up for Canada at the right moment but that's the one thing he could not do, because it's not who he is. Or he could have adapted his message. His whole platform was was "axe the tax", "fukk Trudeau", and "woke". The Liberals fixed two of those things themselves, and the third is just not palatable to Canadians. But that's all he had to run on.
│ │
│ │ │
│ │ │
│ │ │ Commented on Tue Apr 29 09:26:56 2025 UTC
│ │ │
│ │ │ Easiest pivot in political history and he totally fumbled it
│ │ │
│ │ │
│ │ │ Easiest pivot in political history and he totally fumbled it
│ │ │
dude was appealing to canadian maga fans
Commented on Tue Apr 29 02:20:53 2025 UTC
It’s not so much a liberal win as much as it was a conservative loss.
The cons were leading for months but their response to the current US administration was perceived as way softer and weaker than the liberals response. Trump openly backing the conservatives in our election really put the nail in the coffin for the conservatives here.
│
││ Commented on Tue Apr 29 02:26:27 2025 UTC
│
│ Also had Pollieve come out to condemn the 51st state rhetoric it could have swung very differently. He waited to see which way the wind was blowing and I think that cost him the most.
│
│ Edit. I said condone incorrectly.
│
│ │
│ ││ │ Commented on Tue Apr 29 02:30:51 2025 UTC
│ │
│ │ Case in point Doug Ford came out swinging against Trump and he was handed the province again.
│ │
│ │ │
│ │ ││ │ │ Commented on Tue Apr 29 02:36:12 2025 UTC
│ │ │
│ │ │ Yeah exactly, he could have pulled a Ford and it would have easily been a Conservatives majority, but they fumbled so hard while the Liberals took full advantage, and well, guess we're seeing the results.
│ │ │
│ │ │ │
│ │ │ ││ │ │ │ Commented on Tue Apr 29 02:42:37 2025 UTC
│ │ │ │
│ │ │ │ To be fair, many conservatives follow the ideals of trump so they are not going to push back.
│ │ │ │
│ │ │ │ │
│ │ │ │ ││ │ │ │ │ Commented on Tue Apr 29 02:45:55 2025 UTC
│ │ │ │ │
│ │ │ │ │ So many Conservatives caught wearing MAGA hats, combined with slogans like Canada First made it very hard to present themselves as strong opposition to Trump.
│ │ │ │ │
│ │ │ │ │ │
│ │ │ │ │ ││ │ │ │ │ │ Commented on Tue Apr 29 04:31:41 2025 UTC
│ │ │ │ │ │
│ │ │ │ │ │ Trying to promote your nationalism by co-opting another country’s nationalism seems like somewhat of the opposite of how nationalism works lol
│ │ │ │ │ │
│ │ │ │ │ │ │
│ │ │ │ │ │ ││ │ │ │ │ │ │ Commented on Tue Apr 29 11:14:36 2025 UTC
│ │ │ │ │ │ │
│ │ │ │ │ │ │ Promoting your own stupidity by co-opting another country's stupidity tracks though, so there's no issue.
│ │ │ │ │ │ │
Commented on Tue Apr 29 08:59:43 2025 UTC
Pierre Poilievre will be remembered as the guy who went from a projected landslide majority to losing not only the election but also his own seat that he previously held for 20 years in just four months.
Truly a historic fumble.
│
││ Commented on Tue Apr 29 09:09:16 2025 UTC
│
│ Thank you Trump
│
│ │
│ ││ │ Commented on Tue Apr 29 09:19:31 2025 UTC
│ │
│ │ Trump played a part, but this is on Pierre. All he had to do was stand up for Canada at the right moment but that's the one thing he could not do, because it's not who he is. Or he could have adapted his message. His whole platform was was "axe the tax", "fukk Trudeau", and "woke". The Liberals fixed two of those things themselves, and the third is just not palatable to Canadians. But that's all he had to run on.
│ │
│ │ │
│ │ ││ │ │ Commented on Tue Apr 29 09:26:56 2025 UTC
│ │ │
│ │ │ Easiest pivot in political history and he totally fumbled it
│ │ │
cacreddit talking points
Repeat violent offenders set to spend more time in custody as feds approve bail reform bill
Bill C-48 makes it more difficult for known offenders to be released into communities
Stephanie Taylor · The Canadian Press · Posted: Dec 01, 2023 5:37 PM EST | Last Updated: December 1, 2023
.
Amendments to strengthen Canada’s bail system
Amendments to strengthen Canada’s bail systemwww.justice.gc.ca
Amendments to strengthen Canada’s bail system
Former Bill C-48 received Royal Assent and came into effect on January 4, 2024.
On December 5, 2023, the Government of Canada’s amendments to the Criminal Code’s bail provisions to promote community safety and reinforce public confidence in the administration of justice received Royal Assent. The reforms come into force on January 4, 2024.
The amendments make targeted changes to the Criminal Code’s bail regime to address serious repeat violent offending with firearms, knives, bear spray and other weapons. The changes made at the bail stage will also address the enhanced risks posed by intimate partner violence (IPV). The changes seek to improve the safety of people and communities across Canada.
The changes were developed in close collaboration with all provinces and territories, including at a special meeting of Federal-Provincial-Territorial Ministers responsible for Justice and Public Safety on March 10, 2023. The changes are also informed by engagement with other partners and stakeholders, including law enforcement, community organizations and Indigenous partners. These changes respond directly to calls for reform from provincial Premiers and the policing community.
The reforms are only one part of a broader solution to ensure the objectives of the bail system are being met. Canada’s bail system is the joint responsibility of federal, provincial and territorial governments. The federal government establishes the criminal law, within the bounds set by the Charter of Rights and Freedoms. Provincial and territorial governments are responsible for the administration of justice, including most bail hearings and enforcement of bail conditions, as well as for most facilities where people awaiting trial are held.
Law reform is an important part of maintaining and enhancing public safety, but programs, policies and investments are also critical in fostering safer communities. This includes investments to enhance bail enforcement, as well as improving access to housing, mental health and addictions supports. All levels of government agree that improved data collection is necessary to fully understand how the criminal justice system, particularly bail, operates.
This let's me know you don't know what's going on in practicality. In practice violent offenders are being released from jail on bail. Cp24 is always posting YNs out on bail committing new offences.
I implore you to go speak to some police officers about what is actually happening on their beat. Why do you think so many of them decided to un this election?
I'm telling you for free you don't know what you are talking about. Instead of looking up failed promises to keep these guys in prison, go look up violent crime statistics since the bail reform was introduced.
Pollieve is a born loser i would never vote for him,im neutral on political favs but Pierre is trash he works with trash he aligned himself with the fakkits in the "freedom" convoy.He got too comfortable and Trudeau stole his thunder on the way out cuz he was afraid to bark back at trump.
Thats literally what lost him the election him being silent on Trumps 51 st rhetoric.
Hes shorter and less aggressive than his wife...
Thats literally what lost him the election him being silent on Trumps 51 st rhetoric.
Hes shorter and less aggressive than his wife...
POllieve isnt the answer and never was...he released his entire economic platform ONE fawkn week before the election.Mark Carney = Kamala Harris 2.0
That's why. Canadians are so dumb and naive to have elected this man
This is Canadian propaganda. Most people don't know that schooling in Canada only goes to 8th grade so a much higher percentage of people achieve the highest level of education the country has to offer. Please don't take this as me shytting on Canada's education system, it's really incredible what they have done with so little.
Canada has most educated workforce in G7
[Political positivity 
] Mark Carney during his victory speech after election win: “We become just by doing just acts, brave by doing brave acts. When we are kind, kindness grows. When we seek unity, unity grows. When we are Canadian, Canada grows.”
] Mark Carney during his victory speech after election win: “We become just by doing just acts, brave by doing brave acts. When we are kind, kindness grows. When we seek unity, unity grows. When we are Canadian, Canada grows.”He never made Trudeau look stupid actually the exact opposite cost him the election....Trudeau made him look stupid on his way out the door.
I mean it depends. Some people have disability (various levels of illiteracy, vision issues, dislexia, etc.). I could see it being an issue for some even if they are adults. Someone I know close to me can read a little but is not super literate. If there were 8 candidates she could figure it out. But 91 names like the picture and i could see them struggling. They are still employed (manual labor) and pay taxes.Imagine not understanding what alphabetical order is as an adult
My dad is in his 80s and has vision issues. I could see him struggling with this too.
CashmereThoughts
Veteran
No correlation. The here’s noting conservative about Trump.So after all the things trump is doing to Canada, they’re electing a conservative
Poilievre lost because he didn't play it right strategically and because of some bad luck. He was supposed to win this election with a majority. His main message was "Trudeau fukked up the country, lgas is more expensive because of the carbon tax, let's get rid of him". Trudeau resigned, his replacement removes the carbon tax right away...he has nothing left to run on. He is basically a victim of his own success.
The same thing almost happened to Trump. He was going so hard at Biden that when Biden removed his candidacy, people thought Trump might have fukked up his own campaign.
The bad luck for Poilievre was how Trump came in and started wildin. I didn't vote for Poilievre but to be fair, i don't think he's as bad as Trump. His problem was that he was timid in going hard against Trump because he knows deep down that his base has a lot of Trump dikkriders. So because the threat went from Trudeau to Trump, his choice was to either go hard at Trump and lose his base, or keep attacking a man who already resigned. He was fukked either way. He tried to do a little bit of both but it seemed timid. But it's easy to say in hindsight that he should have just ease off on attacking Trudeau. Just bad luck because of Trump.
Another thing is that he has a very adversarial relationship with media so the coverage was not favorable.
Personally i don't like the guy that much but i don't necessarily hate the conservative party. I would have voted for them if Jean Charest would have won the leadership. Also in hindsight, Harper was kinda ok. It was just a perfect storm type situation that made Poilievre lose.
