I picked 'when the time is right'.
But I was thinking 6 months to a year.How do you feel about that?
Well not to be cynical but @Mac Brown did speak some truth. In short, men as a whole will settle on the lowest possible standard---that women, by and large, will accept.
If dusty dudes with little standards and wanting sex on the first date couldn't succeed, there wouldn't be many of them. I've seen more girls, smart and dumb, mess with these dudes when they were young and then be shocked that others copy their behaviors. If you just want to get laid, why not emulate the successful?
A guy I once knew in school told me he was the "nice" guy once putting women on pedestals. But once he turned a$$hole he got laid. Granted, I didn't want all the girls he was tapping but it worked for him I guess.
I'm the one who made the statement. There is no argument. We agree. The rest isn't really relative to the statement he addressed. It obviously works to some degree. I am not disputing that either. Yet society would still thrive and function if men had higher standards. You stated that you have higher standards than most so I'm not really sure why you would dispute or have a problem with that.
No problem, just once you have a few dates and the topic comes up, talk to the dude and let him know what's real up front. It may scare some off but I assume they aren't what you are looking for.
But to echo the other posters, after that period if you two connect, it better be worth his while
Are you looking for the one? Or just maintaining standards?
:ulyin:You know you ain't waiting for 6 months but....I picked 'when the time is right'.
But I was thinking 6 months to a year.
:ulyin:You know you ain't waiting for 6 months but....
we met in April
Then we can have sex on our wedding night. 
Doesn't that sound grand? So romantic
Can't overstate ur value as a pragmatic practical reasonable man.I personally am not judgmental towards people and their sexual habits, but here are my two cents:
I think that the right time is when both sides are ready for it. For dudes who have unrealistic time limits (i.e. 3 dates), it doesn't mean you have swag, just you are too thirsty and aren't discerning. Most guys can wait out within reason for a girl they really dig. If you just want to get laidbut don't get mad if things go sideways.
Me personally, I actually would purposefully not jump into the sack for at least two months or so. Mainly because
1) I was more discerning about women and I only went after women with multiple attributes I liked - not just some girl with a big ass or nice face. It made the investment in time more worthwhile. I didn't feel like wasting time with dumb bish I knew I wouldn't care about after busting my nut
2) I detest materialistic/big spending/psycho/conceited chicks. I need to give myself 1-2 months to get past the initial fake dating stage where everyone puts up a front, looks nice, tries to sound intelligent etc. Eventually the mask slips and I can see if it is worth my time or if I should bail. Also, I can tell the type of chicks who are going to think they 'own' me or I owe them something if I get p*ssy. Whatever
3) I know too many guys who have gotten trapped with kids or STDs. I don't know why dudes go raw with someone they haven't even known a month. Even with protection though, I became extra cautious about the coochie I dove into
4) Sex does distort relationships. I have seem too many dudes get caught up (or even married) to chicks whose bomb p*ssy clouded their judgment on her other (usually negative) attributes. Trust me on this: a good woman is worth putting the effort in to improve sex, a bad woman isn't worth the effort no matter how good she rides it. Part of the whole 'good sex' problem anyway is people (men and women) don't communicate these days. The average girl, who you have a good relationship with, can learn the things you like and do it for you. Unless she has anatomic issues that make you a mismatch or isn't physically attractive, she can learn to do it right. Dudes want a girl that is the shyt in bed on the first lay and then say they don't want someone with a body count.EDIT: yeah, larger sexually compatibility can be a deal breaker if you two just aren't compatible, but this is different than "good on the first lay"
Aight I'll just keep my chick on the side because that's what we doI meant 6 months to a year until marriage.
Aight I'll just keep my chick on the side because that's what we do
At the same time I'll build this nofap energy for our wedding night.
Make sure you drop the side hoe before you sign that contract though because I'm just going to pretend like you don't have needs and that you aren't cheating until the wedding night. If she ain't gone after the wedding and you've finally earned the right to sleep with me I'll build a case so that I can take half. 
I'm so excited snookie. You are much more patient than Katt Williams. I remember he said if he does not kiss a girl around the tine it takes ti finishe a cup of coffee then it's not worth the rest of the time and effort.I have a 3 strikes policy. If she's contributing to half the dates, then it's whenever I can keep throwing balls and she dont have to swing.
But after date 3, if Im paying for everything and getting no hits and cant bring that run home then
if I'm treating her 100% she can get the fukk on after date 2....I ain't no free meals/drinks nikkaI have a 3 strikes policy. If she's contributing to half the dates, then it's whenever I can keep throwing balls and she dont have to swing.
But after date 3, if Im paying for everything and getting no hits and cant bring that run home then
Same. One of my friends had some sad church dude on her roster, while she was fukking with three other guys at the same time.I know girls who told me about how they made dudes they were interested in wait while they were still fukking side nikkas, just so the dude they really want wouldn't think they were easy. I just don't trust these girls in 2016.
I'm not sure why you said all that when no one is disputing that the value of dikk is low due to men's lack of standards.
