How the Alt-Right/Milo playbook is working - this guy helped create it

Althalucian

All Star
Joined
Nov 17, 2016
Messages
1,096
Reputation
310
Daps
4,889
I Helped Create the Milo Trolling Playbook. You Should Stop Playing Right Into It.

(Skipped a few parts to highlight best sections - read the whole thing if you want more details.)

In 2009, I helped sketch out a marketing campaign for an internet personality and blogger named Tucker Max. With a very limited advertising budget available for the independent movie he had written and produced, we had few options for getting the word out.

Maybe it was crazy but my thinking was that one of the best ways to get young men to go see a movie was to tell them they should not be allowed to see it. What ensued was several months of chaos and controversy that ultimately drove Tucker’s book to No. 1 on the New York Times Bestseller list, sold out a multi-college bus tour and ultimately sold millions of dollars worth of tickets, dvds and books.

It was a masterful bit of trolling that admittedly felt a lot more meaningful and exciting when I was younger than it does to me today: We encouraged protests at colleges by sending outraged emails to various activist groups and clubs on campuses where the movie was being screened. We sent fake tips to Gawker, which dutifully ate them up. We created a boycott group on Facebook that acquired thousands of members. We made deliberately offensive ads and ran them on websites where they would be written about by controversy-loving reporters. After I began vandalizing some of our own billboards in Los Angeles, the trend spread across the country, with parties of feminists roving the streets of New York to deface them (with the Village Voice in tow).

But my favorite was the campaign in Chicago—the only major city where we could afford transit advertising. After placing a series of offensive ads on buses and the metro, from my office I alternated between calling in angry complaints to the Chicago CTA and sending angry emails to city officials with reporters cc’d, until ‘under pressure,’ they announced that they would be banning our advertisements and returning our money. Then we put out a press release denouncing this cowardly decision.

I’ve never seen so much publicity. It was madness.


If any of this sounds familiar, it should. Because it’s basically the exact playbook that right wing blogger Milo Yiannopoulos is running on his own cross-country trolling tour. By almost any metric but political correctness, it’s been masterfully successful—his book has since been to #1 on Amazon twice, and the protests at UC Berkeley last week generated national headlines and were addressed directly by the President.

The déjà vu is not accidental. Numerous leaders of the alt-right movement read the book I published in 2012, which outlined exactly how this media strategy works. Several have told me Trust Me, I’m Lying is their bible.

It’s a sad irony for me, since I wrote the book as an explicit warning about how broken our media system was and why it needed to be fixed. As I would say in interviews, the strategies that I used were designed to market books and clothes for companies like American Apparel, but I was exposing how they worked because I worried how others might soon use them to sell something more nefarious.

I should be clear about a few things: I’m not advising Milo or the alt-right in any capacity. Though I have spoken (as well as interviewed several for this column) to several of them, I disagree with their message and their aims. I don’t think we should build a wall along the border, I have no problem with an all-female cast of Ghostbusters, I don’t think we should ban Muslims from this country and I think the first few weeks of Trump’s presidency are only a sign of the malevolence and incompetence to come.

This puts me in a somewhat unique position in which I am deeply disturbed by our current political situation but I am not so blinded by my outrage that I don’t see exactly what these media manipulators are doing. My conversations with these figures—including occasional friendly chats with Milo—brings me to this column: You guys are playing completely into their hands.

Most brands and personalities try to appeal to a wide swath of the population. Niche players and polarizing personalities are only ever going to be interesting to a small subgroup. While this might seem like a disadvantage, it’s actually a huge opportunity: Because it allows them to leverage the dismissals, anger, mockery, and contempt of the population at large as proof of their credibility. Someone like Milo or Mike Cernovich doesn’t care that you hate them—they like it. It’s proof to their followers that they are doing something subversive and meaningful. It gives their followers something to talk about. It imbues the whole movement with a sense of urgency and action—it creates purpose and meaning.

... (Skipping ahead)

It’s here that I think people are really giving the alt-right exactly what they want. One of the best ways to sow and exploit division is to look for moral hypocrisy. With the Planned Parenthood stunt, we were able to say: “Look, you claim to care about reproductive rights, yet you are turning down $500,000.” (Your smarter fans appreciate the brilliant trolling and your dumber fans really buy the argument). When protesters try to revoke someone’s right to speak or when someone like Richard Spencer is physically assaulted on camera, you’re not intimidating anyone—you’re emboldening them. You’re giving them a wonderful recruiting tool. They’re laughing all the way to the bank.

...

If you actually want to fight back against these trolls, here’s a strategy to consider: Organize all you want, get as many people as you can to show up at their events, but don’t try to shut them down. In fact, the only thing you should try to shut down are the instigators who try to incite violence. Regain the moral high ground by saying that you absolutely respect their right to free speech.

And then, actually listen and talk to them. To me, the most effective retorts against the alt-right were when Trevor Noah had Tomi Lahren on his show and when Elle Reeve profiled Richard Spencer for Vice. Both came off looking mostly like jokes. Tomi Lahren showed her age. Richard Spencer revealed his movement to be mostly a collection of a few thousand sad dorks. Wale’s Twitter exchange with Tomi was effective too—there was no outrage, no opposition, just teasing.

They say sunlight is the best disinfectant. But it is also what allows you to see whether the emperor has any clothes. And it’s this sad, and often pathetic reality, that the collective hysteria has beneficently covered up in those it’s trying to fight. What should be seen as farce somehow looks like real fascism.

...

It’s easy to sound smart and provocative when you’re the underdog. It’s easier to be reckless when you have nothing to lose. It’s also easier to create a united front when you really are being persecuted or attacked—when you’re an outsider. At least all of this is harder than expressing a coherent, cogent message for an extended period of time.

...

The old playbook stopped working…until a new generation picked it up again.
 

Menelik II

I wanna see receipts!
Joined
Dec 4, 2016
Messages
4,914
Reputation
1,042
Daps
14,911
good article and good points.

Couple of things here:
a) people just love controversy and hype
b) the inherent problem of libertarianism, is that a malevolent opposition can easily abuse the free speech to troll and undermine the consensus. So although free speech works 95% of the time, its easy for nefarious types to totally derail a movement, without adding anything to the debate. Most of these types are not 'pro free speech', infact the opposite.

The horrors off history make people are weary of letting this small degenerate few undermine democracy, the potential danger of not acting is bigger than denying a troll free speech. As we saw with Kyrie, ridiculous ideas propagate very quickly, and established ideas/facts are thrown into doubt.

On the other hand, as in this article, censoring them gives them more exposure. Also letting them talk, gives them an opportunity to hang themselves. Im undecided on what the right way to play it is.
 

714562

Superstar
Joined
May 8, 2012
Messages
7,767
Reputation
1,640
Daps
17,487
I read this article few days ago. Anyone who worked for Tucker Max is not to be trusted.
 

mc_brew

#NotMyPresident
Joined
May 19, 2012
Messages
5,803
Reputation
2,695
Daps
19,991
Reppin
the black cat is my crown...
i don't believe every moronic idea should be treated seriously and debated... some ideas are dumb and should be called dumb.... i prefer calling out lies and trolling and then ignoring the liar/troll...... the left gives too much life to dumb ideas instead of debating legitimate counter arguments.....
 

tru_m.a.c

IC veteran
Staff member
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
31,670
Reputation
6,972
Daps
91,551
Reppin
Gaithersburg, MD via Queens/LI
i don't believe every moronic idea should be treated seriously and debated... some ideas are dumb and should be called dumb.... i prefer calling out lies and trolling and then ignoring the liar/troll...... the left gives too much life to dumb ideas instead of debating legitimate counter arguments.....
to be fair, if you're gay or transexual, those dumb ideas aren't so easy to ignore. People do and will fukk up their life off some stupid shyt that you or I can easily brush off.
 

mc_brew

#NotMyPresident
Joined
May 19, 2012
Messages
5,803
Reputation
2,695
Daps
19,991
Reppin
the black cat is my crown...
to be fair, if you're gay or transexual, those dumb ideas aren't so easy to ignore. People do and will fukk up their life off some stupid shyt that you or I can easily brush off.
i hear what you're saying... i wasn't really referring to individuals though... i was more referring to platforms.... and i'm also saying sometimes ideas need to be dismissed and not legitimized.... a lot of these trolls in the media say things because there will be controversy... there are legitimate arguments to be made but society is mostly fed b.s. instead....

an example would be a tv show with a dem and rep debating social security... the rep would say that the dem wants to raise taxes on the wealthy because he's jealous of that person's success.... the dem's retort would be that the rep is selfish and just wants to throw grandma out the window..... while there is a legitimate debate about social security and what tax rates should be, this isn't an example of a fruitful debate about it.... the media puts this type of argument in front of the american people to distract us from the very real debate we should be having..... in this example, i would prefer the dem not give legitimacy to the argument he's jealous and bring up facts and figures to show that society is better off with social security and a more progressive tax rate... that's kind of what i was referring to....
 

re'up

Veteran
Joined
May 26, 2012
Messages
21,415
Reputation
6,683
Daps
67,404
Reppin
San Diego
This style of marketing/branding has really infiltrated everywhere, all the paid ads on local news websites, pop up ads, the controversy technique is just one example, there's also the "This hoodie is sold out ALL OVER California", or 'What the Razor companies don't want you to find you"...It's really an indictment of our society as a whole, that people like Tucker Max and Milo have been able to become cult like celebrities. I read that Tucker Max book, and it was repulsive, I am older now, then I was back in 2009 when I first read it, it's really a disturbing date rape manifesto.
 
Top