and how would she "know better" than to exhibit that behavior unless there were clear repercussions for her actions? that's the exact problem with society. the woman can initiate violence and is the one who gets off scott-free. she started with the violence, but it's the man's fault because he should have somehow shown her he wasn't to be played with... but then he shows her he isn't to be played with by laying that goon-hand down and he's the bad guy. why is the onus always on the male to act in a civil fashion when women strived to be treated as equals, meaning they are also equally capable of self-control? the message is clear in this day and age. a lot of the pass that women had is disappearing since it has been abused so much and since women are so adamant on screaming for equality. If a woman decides to start up with some violence and gets hit with some in return, it ain't the preferable option, but it's like 2pac said -- fair exchange. You don't want to get hit, keep your hands to yourself.