The term African-American has some issues. A Nigerian American or Ghanaian American could be called the exact same thing, but they'd have a link back to their specific country and culture and tribe that could not be shared by an African Descendant of Slavery AKA Foundational Black American. Not easily. If someone wanted to give their DNA to one of these shady white companies then MAYBE they MIGHT be able to find their tribe.
Africa is a as whole ass continent. There are tribes there that straight up do not like each other. What the hell does "African-American" really mean if you're trying to trace back your lineage through slavery to your people? How specific can you get besides West Africa or besides Nigeria?
These new terms are important because there is a difference and it's worth emphasizing the difference, especially when it comes to reparations which would proportionally reward those families that were devastated by the actions of racist white people over the centuries. Unfortunately, thanks partially to bad actors depressing black vote help to ensure we can't seriously discuss reparations for dozens of years to come thanks to this trump-appointed Supreme Court.
I butt heads against Tariq fans because he is one of those bad actors likes to push divisiveness and depress Black vote while claiming to care about Black Americans. He came up with a good term and one that I really don't think people should have any issue with. But for the guy himself in the way he pushes contradictory ideas that don't actually increase our political power in this country the way it is. I don't fukk with him at all.
Language carries the fingerprints of its creator, especially when the creator actively brands, markets, and polices it (which Tariq does). Trying to "separate" a term from its toxic creator is easier said than done, especially when the creator is still alive, active, and exploiting the term for his own personal gain. Every time someone uses "FBA," it boosts Tariq's brand whether they intend it or not.
I feel, because of that, using a term that's clean, descriptive, and free of that baggage, like "Generational Black American" is the best way forward. It honors the specific lineage and history we're trying to emphasize, without tying us to grifters or the chaos they leave in their wake.
I agree with you that the distinction matters, especially around reparations. But if we're serious about advancing that cause, we need to be strategic not just about the ideas, but also the language we use to organize ourselves. Words have power, and they also have baggage when bad actors are attached to them.
We don't need to prop up someone who has actively weakened Black political power to make a legitimate case for our lineage. We have the history, the receipts, and the right to advocate without borrowing a brand built on toxicity.