fukk THE PATS
And you know what? Just cause I have'nt said it damn near all year? fukk the Red Sox too![]()
:patsfanumad:
:bradyHaHa:
fukk THE PATS
And you know what? Just cause I have'nt said it damn near all year? fukk the Red Sox too![]()
Correct...These are the terms you laid out:
Thus @[B]Stress Welker[/B] serves a 4 week ban if and only if the court upholds the existing suspension. (By your own admission in a post on the last page, the court will either uphold the 4 game suspension or throw it out, no reductions)
[B]@The Fukin Prophecy[/B] will serve a 4 week ban if and only if Brady's suspension is 'rescinded'...taken to mean Brady serves 0 games on a suspension.
Thus, if the NFL/Brady come to an agreement for fewer games outside the court, then the court did NOT uphold the suspension, thus @Stress Welker serves no weeks banned. Similarly, since we're taking 'rescinded' to mean zero games, then you serve no weeks banned either.
But your original bet with me did not have a disclaimer against reductions.

The team that escaped an Eli Manning party crash
The team with wins via questionable methods
The team with a QB WHO IS NOT STARTING THE FIRST 4 GAMES OF THIS SEASON
I HOPE THE JETS CRUSH YOU TRICK ASS MOTHERfukkERS AND WIN THE AFC EAST![]()
Some cheating bytches wonWho won he super bowl this year? Patriots or Seahawks?
I'm not a Jets fan fukk boi...my team is the one with 4 Super Bowl winsSee the difference between us and ya? You wishing to win Division Titles, If we don't win the superbowl our season is a Failure. For you winning the Division is the goal, Come January We're too busy Figuring out Playoff schedules/Game times and Ordering Championship Garments while you're Online looking at Mock Drafts, We're not the same, We're not built the same...
![]()
#DeflateDeez

Correct...
That's not precisely what stress Weller is saying though... @Stress Welker clearly wants settlement stipulations and claims there was no explicit disclaimer against reductions...
Maybe if you took the time to READ and COMPREHEND instead of circle jerk dapping yourselves you'd realize the only one confused here is @Stress Welker
Better yet if you combine your brain power you may be able to match that of a semi functional human beings...Start reading posts together and talk it over before you post...work as a team brehs like Tammay and the ball boys did...![]()

No, moron you're changing the bet. Now you want suspension upheld and a reduction on your side. That's not what we agreed to. Reduction equals the bet squashed.
And he explicitly posted what I quoted once again proving your boy @Stress Welker is the only one confused and your dumbass continues defending him...So he used too many big words and you got confused
He didn't want settlement stipulations he pointed out that there were none, thus if there's a settlement, the bet is off.
How do I know this? Well, a) cuz he explicitly says this...
And b) cuz this all started (in this thread) cuz you're dodging @cook's bet, which DOES have settlement/reduction stipulations and @Stress Welker was just pointing how unfair it was that you reject that and ask that cook absorb all of the penalty from a reduced suspension.

Reading is fundamental, read and make sure you understand what you're replying to before you hit post...na we're doing 1 game = 1 week
so if it gets overturned, anyone who bets against us gets 4 weeks. if it gets reduced say 2 games, then we sit for the 2 games he's out and the next two weeks that he initially would have been suspended for, our enemies are out.

And he explicitly posted what I quoted once again proving your boy @Stress Welker is the only one confused and your dumbass continues defending him...
This is cooks bet btw moron...
Reading is fundamental, read and make sure you understand what you're replying to before you hit post...
If ANYBODY accepts my bet there is no settelment stipulations...if there is a settlement no one fukking gets banned...
With cooks bet everyone is looks at a ban if there is a settlement that reduces the suspension...
How may times does this need to be said before you idiots allow it to sink into your tiny brains?
My god you mothafukkas are dense...![]()
If the NFL had a shred of integrity they would have warned the Patriots before the game and eliminated this from the start.
If the NFL had a shred of integrity they would have admitted the balls weren’t actually deflated.
If the NFL had a shred of dignity they would have said they couldn’t prove anything.
But instead Roger Goodell, Troy Vincent, Mike Kensil, Dave Gardi and their merry band of idiots manipulated the patzys at ESPN and tried to run the worst sting operation in the history of civilization.
They then ran an “independent” investigation that would have made Hitler blush to confirm the results they wanted to hear. And even then they couldn’t do it. Goodell had to name himself arbitrator because anybody who didn’t have an agenda would have thrown this case out in a heartbeat.

And he explicitly posted what I quoted once again proving your boy @Stress Welker is the only one confused and your dumbass continues defending him...
This is cooks bet btw moron...
Reading is fundamental, read and make sure you understand what you're replying to before you hit post...
If ANYBODY accepts my bet there is no settelment stipulations...if there is a settlement no one fukking gets banned...I NEVER said cook or anybody will absorb all of the penalty from a settlement reduction because there are NO SETTLEMENT STIPULATIONS in my proposed bet you illitetate fukk...
With cooks proposed bet everyone is looking at a ban if there is a settlement that reduces the suspension because he included settlement stipulations...
How many times does this need to be explained before you idiots allow it to sink into your tiny brains?
My god you mothafukkas are dense...![]()
