Well they probably considered the chance of death or other failure to be quite high on a return mission so they stayed. If they dont know calculation error there was on their route they wouldnt make it back except by chance. Supplies were probably very limited as well.
So was it a suicide mission? A shipwreck? How did they find that tiny-ass island in the middle of nowhere in the Pacific? If they had missed Easter Island, would they have just kept floating all the way to Ecuador? They had chickens and all their agricultural plants, so it seemed like they were well prepared to settle. Their oral tradition claims the island was scouted out first before being moved to, but it also claims the chief was told about the island in a dream, so hard to say how much of the story is reliable.
Either way, the residents came in canoes either from the Gambier Islands (1,600 miles away) or the Marquesas Islands (2,000 miles away), which a fukking wild distance to travel on a canoe in the ocean.
The first example of Madagascar would be frightening at first but also dope as hell. Finding a totally new world and settling it with comrades would be like manna from heaven for some people back then and even today...though I doubt many of the modern men have the survival techniques required
Yeah, it would have been a full on science fiction series. They built an entire civilization on an untouched island in a completely different continent than they had ever known.
I looked it up and saw that the single-population shipwreck theory is just one theory about how Madagascar was settled. There are opposing theories that believe it was settled by multiple waves of Indonesians who already knew about the island and were involved in trade routes back and forth. Which would be fukking wild in itself, because who does 5,000 mile trade routes across entire oceans in outrigger canoes?