I demand the mods and admins improve the rep system

[CantStop]

10 people a day?
have to rep 40 people before I can rep someone else?

@Brooklynzson @bk

how the fukk am I getting the same privileges as people that have not donated at all to this site?

I DEMAND CHANGE.

 

[Gunshi]

reps aint shyt!!!! same nikkaz forming rep/jerk circles repping each other.. shyt holds no true value

 

[cook]

10 people a day?
have to rep 40 people before I can rep someone else?

@Brooklynzson @bk

how the fukk am I getting the same privileges as people that have not donated at all to this site?

I DEMAND CHANGE.

if people didnt have rep gangs we wouldnt have to do this. 4 days to rep the same person again isnt really that bad and its actually an improvement from the previous system. we'd be getting complaints out the ass if you could neg the same person every other day

 

[the cac mamba]

systems actually pretty good

 

[Higher Tech]

I think things we better without rep, but I like this system better.

 

[yo moms]

Where are the red bars?

Numbers?

Miss me with that wack shyt.

 

[Poitier]

Negative and Positive rep should be two separate bars

 

[the cac mamba]

the thing that fukked up rep was that it was weighted. so you had all the fakkits runnin around starting e-gangs . but now that its not weighted its straight

 

[Poitier]

I mean if they separate neg and positive rep then it would deter people from negging and you could measure the difference

 

[cook]

I mean if they separate neg and positive rep then it would deter people from negging and you could measure the difference

how would it deter negging and why is that needed?

 

[Poitier]

how would it deter negging and why is that needed?

It might not deter it but it would give a clearer view of a user's credibility

Is a person with no rep the same as a person with 400 rep and 400 neg? Like right now you just see if someone is in the negative, you just assume they are a troll, but if you knew they had a ton of rep as well, it would take some of the luster off of neg training a specific user and just show that they are a polarizing poster. Maybe my logic is wrong though


It's the same theory behind post/dap ratio

 

[cook]

It might not deter it but it would give a clearer view of a user's credibility

Is a person with no rep the same as a person with 400 rep and 400 neg? Like right now you just see if someone is in the negative, you just assume they are a troll, but if you knew they had a ton of rep as well, it would take some of the luster off of neg training a specific user and just show that they are a polarizing poster. Maybe my logic is wrong though

interesting idea but no thanks. dont need to overdue it. one line for rep is enough, we like to keep things simple

 

[Higher Tech]

It might not deter it but it would give a clearer view of a user's credibility

Is a person with no rep the same as a person with 400 rep and 400 neg? Like right now you just see if someone is in the negative, you just assume they are a troll, but if you knew they had a ton of rep as well, it would take some of the luster off of neg training a specific user and just show that they are a polarizing poster. Maybe my logic is wrong though


It's the same theory behind post/dap ratio

Check the daps. I rarely get repped, but my dap numbers stay cool, so thats what I look for.

Thanks to @Liu Kang for gettin me even.

 

[61 Corpses]

People shouldn't be able to hide their profiles so we can see all of their neg comments

 

[Poitier]

lol I really just want to have two separate rep/ neg bars so I can troll while still having a high rep count. I've been trying to break 300 for like a month now but the urge to troll always undermines my efforts