"I can tell you have no rebuttal"
There's no "rebuttal" for trash posting, because it speaks for itself.
You don't use shyt like "PER, +/-, better defensive rating, better offensive rating, better net rating, and is winning" when comparing the ability of players, without the proper context, especially not over a two-game sample size. Randle is a role player who comes off the bench for one of hottest teams at the moment, whereas LaVine is #1 option on a team with a lack of talent. shyt like plus/minus, DRTG/ORTG, NRTG are NOT individual metrics, they're metrics based on the lineups you play in - all you're basically saying by referencing those stats is that the Pelicans are a better team than the Bulls.
Randle plays with the likes of AD, Mirotic, Jrue etc
LaVine plays with the likes of Payne, Portis, Lopez etc
shyt, swap out Randle for LaVine, and the Pelicans would be arguably the second-best team in the West. A Jrue-LaVine-Mirotic-AD combo lineup would be unstoppable: FOUR players who can drop 30+ points (any given game) from all over the floor.
Randle has a better "PER, +/-, better defensive rating, better offensive rating, better net rating, and is winning" than LeBron - does that mean he's better than LeBron too?
You can't seriously believe Randle is capable of a game like that? This board is reaching WOAT levels with their basketball takes. Lord have mercy.