Well she better pay a chunk of the mortgage before she stops working. If she helps me with that before the kids then I'm cool.
“I don’t want to work after kids”
- Thread starter Braman
- Start date
010101
C L O N E*0690//////
give her a job*
Ezekiel 25:17
Veteran
I’ll park here and observe all the posters who talk out both sides of their mouth. Be in one thread talking about a woman’s traditional role and in the next not with the traditional male role
The problem is divorce. Not saying it would happen, but You gotta pay alimony, child support, and lose half your net worth via the house and even 401k. I would like to pay all the bills but it's too risky.
If you have a working spouse, divorce is much less harsh.
I’ll park here and observe all the posters who talk out both sides of their mouth. Be in one thread talking about a woman’s traditional role and in the next not with the traditional male role
Slide over. I brought some snacks
Then I ain’t a “HVM”Them newfangled ghetto definitions don’t mean shyt to me
Who hurt you
Ezekiel 25:17
Veteran
From my experience—-the woman who’s the motivation for me to make the thread—-yes, she will.
In order to submit at that level it requires wealth. They’ve found a way to romanticize being a goal digger. They just put it on the kids ‘I want to be able to raise my kids not some daycare.’
And the ultimate red flag: ‘as a stay at home mom I’m a chef, maid, nanny, all in one so technically I am bringing in income’
What about a man who makes enough to hire a chef, maid, and nanny? Then what?
You would be far, far better off hiring those services. It would be cheaper and you can always cancel.
I plan on retiring in my 40s......all I can say
Ezekiel 25:17
Veteran
Traditional roles comes with traditional responsibilities
What the hell does traditional roles even mean?
If a woman works, is she still not cooking and cleaning like a traditional woman?
Even if both ya'll are working, somebody still has to cook, clean, cut the grass. and look after the kids. Split that shyt up and call it a day.
For the sake of the general topic, the two options are too black and white.
For the sake of this specific scenario, we are not compatible and we need to break it on up.
For the sake of this specific scenario, we are not compatible and we need to break it on up.
Spliff
Godzilla got busy.
Not a dealbreaker. It’s actually ideal for the child’s early life. 
However, the delusion in OP’s specific example is a dealbreaker. Real life just doesn’t work like that. Sacrifices are usual made unless the single income is up there
However, the delusion in OP’s specific example is a dealbreaker. Real life just doesn’t work like that. Sacrifices are usual made unless the single income is up there
Last edited:
Traveling and shopping aren't traditional parts of the deal. Ask the average 80 or 90+ yr old woman that stayed at home how much shopping she did or how many trips she went on.I’ll park here and observe all the posters who talk out both sides of their mouth. Be in one thread talking about a woman’s traditional role and in the next not with the traditional male role
If we keeping it a buck, men would be far more receptive to actual traditional roles as it is far more beneficial. When women speak on it they usually base it on the santized, rose colored, or frankly make believe version.
