You passed, so I would offer you a better shift and more money
including a sign on bonus. And you would take it.
I have a biz and I hire folk.
but the way @Silver Surfer broke it down... I guess I can see the logicbut i don't tell nobody about the coli so i told her oh on google somewhere auntie![]()
me neither. This is a secret society all we ask is trussttt
Someone confirmed it was 21 on the first page. I saw that and kept it moving. Came back a day later and this shyt is still going. 
this one woman was desperate to get hire. She was nervous the whole interview and was saying how she would give 1000% and could start immediately. I told her I had a few more interviews and she said I should hire her.
I broke out this problem and told her I would hire her if she solved it in under 30 seconds.
she looked at it for about 10 seconds and tried to figure it out. Then she gave me this sad look, thanked me for interviewing her, got up and walked out![]()
Sure it does. You can tell if someone is
Overconfident
Lacks attention to detail
Doesn't process shyt well
Lacks confidence
Or they're just plain slow. The longest someone took to do this with was 27 minutes. And they still got it wrong![]()

This some fukk shyt bro. There's more important things than solving a stupid ass puzzle. Like someone who is going to go far and beyond for the job. And has loyalty and honesty. And you here giggling about this shyt. Enjoy your play thread.

...so you will hire a stupid muhfukka and be like..."who cares about your lack of basic problem solving skills....your loyal"
Wait a minute... you really give this problem to potential employees and use it a barometer to see if they are a worthy hire or not?
...so you will hire a stupid muhfukka and be like..."who cares about your lack of basic problem solving skills....your loyal"
![]()
in my weird, programmatical mind, the two horseshoe image is 4 sure BUT we technically were never told what that image of one horseshoe equals. I don't immediately equate that one horseshoe image to half of 4 but technically an undefined value.
now if it was a coefficient before the two horseshoe image I could see.....
in my weird, programmatical mind, the two horseshoe image is 4 sure BUT we technically were never told what that image of one horseshoe equals. I don't immediately equate that one horseshoe image to half of 4 but technically an undefined value.
now if it was a coefficient before the two horseshoe image I could see.....