I personally don't believe the NBA is rigged

onelastdeath

Banned
Joined
Jul 19, 2014
Messages
29,376
Reputation
11,012
Daps
134,991
Although I do believe there are obvious games that are rigged like the 2002 LA vs Kings, 2010 Celtics vs Lakers Game 7, etc etc. I don't think the refs rig every single Conference Finals or Finals games. Honestly, it would be a full time job for the refs to rig every single game, on top of the job the refs already have to do. Plus it would look too obvious and the NBA would be found out quick. But I do believe in selective rigging
So if you believe the obvious ones, what makes you not believe the less obvious ones?
 

ExodusNirvana

Change is inevitable...
Joined
Jun 6, 2012
Messages
43,028
Reputation
9,794
Daps
156,315
Reppin
Brooklyn, NY
The fact that the advertisers checks have already been cashed doesn't mean it's NOT rigged :laugh:

But like I said in another thread...

HOLD THE REFS RESPONSIBLE
 
Last edited:

VegasCAC

Leader of #CACset
Supporter
Joined
Jan 10, 2015
Messages
8,312
Reputation
2,000
Daps
42,818
Wrong. If it was rigged and they didn't care about people knowing them we'd get those things.

More than anything, it's important that the league maintains the illusion of honor and fairness. That's way more important than any single series.

The illusion that all is fair and honest. If that goes, the NBA goes.

Why make it rigged at all if the illusion of honor and fairness is more important?

I agree that the league makes financial decisions when it decides things like suspensions. But I doubt there is some proscribed agenda in officiating, at least not anymore (2002 LA-SAC series was a little sketchy, and Donaghe used to officiate).

The league fukking failed at rigging its playoffs when we saw those bullshyt San Antonio-Detroit and San Antonio Cleveland Finals :snoop:

There's poorly called games and people are human, so they are influenced by what players and coaches are telling them and the media, and who they like more, consciously or subconsciously. But Silver isn't making a call telling them to make one team win and another lose.

Also, rigging implies that the mechanism of fixing somehow affected the outcome. Cleveland was going to win that game no matter what, and Steve Kerr said as much.
 

Malta

Sweetwater
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
66,896
Reputation
15,260
Daps
279,781
Reppin
Now who else wanna fukk with Hollywood Court?
Unless y'all believe that some of these THIRTY FIVE year vets who have been doing the same jobs for hundreds and thousands of games, all of a sudden make TERRIBLE calls. All that discipline, memory, repetition and excellence can go out the window just like that, to make terrible calls that EVERYONE can see is wrong.

Nah.


The game is a lot faster than it is on TV, 3 refs for 10 people on a court, dudes miss calls all the time because of the speed of the game.








I think if the NBA went with more courtside cameras people would get a better appreciation of just how fast these dudes are moving and how difficult it is to see things at times. That's why a lot of flops and obvious baiting still gets called, because the refs are going by reaction because they can't see everything that's happening. If anything, they should add a 4th ref to the crew.
 

Nomad1

Tupac KONY and GOAT
Joined
Jun 23, 2013
Messages
13,896
Reputation
4,070
Daps
40,213
Reppin
Toronto
Although I do believe there are obvious games that are rigged like the 2002 LA vs Kings, 2010 Celtics vs Lakers Game 7, etc etc. I don't think the refs rig every single Conference Finals or Finals games. Honestly, it would be a full time job for the refs to rig every single game, on top of the job the refs already have to do. Plus it would look too obvious and the NBA would be found out quick. But I do believe in selective rigging
No doubt there's selective rigging, most of what people think are rigging are just bad calls/poor judgement on the officials and the league.
 

Quiet Magician

Superstar
Joined
Mar 13, 2014
Messages
4,919
Reputation
4,425
Daps
35,178
For one, like I said; if a teams clearly being manhandled then they wouldn't:

But if a game is close and financially it makes sense to change the outcome with one or two questionable calls, then why wouldn't they?

You guys are the same people who probably believe boxers NEVER throw fights.

Tin foil hats the lot of you.
 

UpAndComing

Veteran
Joined
Aug 18, 2013
Messages
75,896
Reputation
18,850
Daps
318,265
So if you believe the obvious ones, what makes you not believe the less obvious ones?

I don't think it's a matter of obvious and less obvious. I think it's more game by game. Seriously I can't believe refs spending 3 hours trying to rig one game for about 20+ Conference Finals and Finals games. Refs aren't robots

But like I said I do believe they chose a certain game to rig, and rig for the entire game. Whether the calls are obvious or less obvious
 
Top