Wrong. If it was rigged and they didn't care about people knowing them we'd get those things.
More than anything, it's important that the league maintains the illusion of honor and fairness. That's way more important than any single series.
The illusion that all is fair and honest. If that goes, the NBA goes.
Why make it rigged at all if the illusion of honor and fairness is more important?
I agree that the league makes financial decisions when it decides things like suspensions. But I doubt there is some proscribed agenda in officiating, at least not anymore (2002 LA-SAC series was a little sketchy, and Donaghe used to officiate).
The league fukking failed at rigging its playoffs when we saw those bullshyt San Antonio-Detroit and San Antonio Cleveland Finals
There's poorly called games and people are human, so they are influenced by what players and coaches are telling them and the media, and who they like more, consciously or subconsciously. But Silver isn't making a call telling them to make one team win and another lose.
Also, rigging implies that the mechanism of fixing somehow affected the outcome. Cleveland was going to win that game no matter what, and Steve Kerr said as much.