I
- Thread starter -----
- Start date
Get better role models.
OK, you arrogant little shyt.
What we have here is a case of confirmation bias.
If I have a belief that, say, all strippers are loose, STD-carrying, goldiggers, then I'm going to favor evidence that supports my belief.
This is what you're doing with pimps. You're biased.
It's called first hand knowledge. I have it and ya'll don't. Again if you don't want the truth don't quote me.
Non Sequitur
Creep.
No, you have second-hand knowledge. Unless... *gasp*
You've been pimped
Anything you wanna tell us?
No, you have second-hand knowledge. Unless... *gasp*
You've been pimped
Anything you wanna tell us?
First hand knowledge can be gained through observation. Keep trying though. You may get to a decent jab eventually.
Non Sequitur
Creep.
No. No it can't.
If that was true, you could know all about pimping just from watching YouTube vids. And that's not the case, now is it?
No. No it can't.
If that was true, you could know all about pimping just from watching YouTube vids. And that's not the case, now is it?
Google it honey. Someone telling you how they pimp and me watching a pimp in action are too totally different things. That is why I know it's bullshyt.
http://definitions.uslegal.com/f/firsthand-knowledge/
"Firsthand knowledge refers to something which the witness actually saw or heard, as distinguished from something he learned from some other person or source. It is also a knowledge that is gained through firsthand observation or experience, as distinguished from a belief based on what someone else has said. The federal rules of evidence requires lay witnesses to have personal knowledge of the matters they testify about. It is an affidavit that is based on personal knowledge, unless the affiant makes clear that a statement relies on “information and belief”.
Again keep trying...
Mountain
All Star
lol @ this coming from a "stripper" that willingly engages and contributes to a culture where women are objectified and their bodys are treated like slot machines. You dont give a fck about the misogyny of this culture, in fact women like you help fuel the misogyny of this culture so dead the bullsht.
Non Sequitur
Creep.
Google it honey. Someone telling you how they pimp and me watching a pimp in action are too totally different things. That is why I know it's bullshyt.
http://definitions.uslegal.com/f/firsthand-knowledge/
"Firsthand knowledge refers to something which the witness actually saw or heard, as distinguished from something he learned from some other person or source. It is also a knowledge that is gained through firsthand observation or experience, as distinguished from a belief based on what someone else has said. The federal rules of evidence requires lay witnesses to have personal knowledge of the matters they testify about. It is an affidavit that is based on personal knowledge, unless the affiant makes clear that a statement relies on “information and belief”.
Again keep trying...
OK, you arrogant little shyt.
What we have here is a case of confirmation bias.
If I have a belief that, say, all strippers are loose, STD-carrying, goldiggers, then I'm going to favor evidence that supports my belief.
This is what you're doing with pimps. You're biased.
Oh, and here's something else for you to read:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anecdotal_evidence
Sex work in general is promoted my many feminist groups. Whether it promotes misogyny can be argued. So
. Either way strippers have nothing to do with absentee fathers but the promoting of pimping certainly does so your point is null.
Non Sequitur
Creep.
Strippers have nothing to do with absentee fathers, but absentee fathers have something to do with strippers that's for damn sure 
The definition of pimping is manipulation. There is nothing anecdotal about that. Regardless, I still have first hand knowledge and you don't. Know you definitions before you try to argue them. You didn't dodge a bullet. You were clearly proven wrong. Again, if you don't want truth don't quote me.
Strippers have nothing to do with absentee fathers, but absentee fathers have something to do with strippers that's for damn sure
In some cases.
Non Sequitur
Creep.
Maybe in a purely academic sense. In the real world you don't know shyt. Google that, boy.
Stings don't it?