CAN YOU READ?
RUNNING FROM LAW ENFORCEMENT
IS ILLEGAL EVEN IF YOU
DIDN'T COMMIT A CRIME.
THEY WERE LOOKING FOR
ASSAILANTS AND HE RAN
WHICH GIVES THEM THE RIGHT
TO DETAIN HIM
ICE arrests innocent FBA teenager in Chicago for no reason
- Thread starter EBK String
- Start date
CAN YOU READ?
RUNNING FROM LAW ENFORCEMENT
IS ILLEGAL EVEN IF YOU
DIDN'T COMMIT A CRIME.
THEY WERE LOOKING FOR
ASSAILANTS AND HE RAN
WHICH GIVES THEM THE RIGHT
TO DETAIN HIM
Pull Up the Roots
Breakfast for dinner.
That's not true. Law enforcement can't legally detain anyone just because they run. That's not how the 4th amendment works. They still need reasonable suspicion of a crime. Besides, ICE was conducting a civil immigration operation targeting someone specific that looked nothing like Warren King, so they had no reason to be suspicious of him.
IF YOU RUN FROM LAW ENFORCEMENT
YOU CAN AND WILL BE DETAINED.
THIS ISNT A NEW NOR ILLEGAL
CONCEPT.
He didn't commit any crime, he wasn't the person they were pursuing, and he was a fukking US citizen trying to escape the chaos created by ICE inside of the store where he was shopping. People run from danger, especially when armed men in tactical gear swarm the place.
Feds gas Chicago neighborhood, detain young Black man amid day of Southeast Side raids • The TRiiBE
For the second time in less than a week, militarized federal agents deployed tear gas in Chicago residential neighborhoods. Nearby, they detained a young Black man onlookers insisted was a U.S. citizen
thetriibe.com
I don't understand how some of you can live in this country as Black men and women and not know your rights. What you're saying is not only wrong, but extremely dangerous in its justification for violating them. You're doing the work of authoritarianism.
CAN YOU READ?
RUNNING FROM LAW ENFORCEMENT
IS ILLEGAL EVEN IF YOU
DIDN'T COMMIT A CRIME.
THEY WERE LOOKING FOR
ASSAILANTS AND HE RAN
WHICH GIVES THEM THE RIGHT
TO DETAIN HIM
The Supreme Court made it clear in Illinois v. Wardlow that flight alone doesn't give police the right to detain you. They still need reasonable suspicion of a crime.
That's not true. Law enforcement can't legally detain anyone just because they run. That's not how the 4th amendment works. They still need reasonable suspicion of a crime. Besides, ICE was conducting a civil immigration operation targeting someone specific that looked nothing like Warren King, so they had no reason to be suspicious of him.
He didn't commit any crime, he wasn't the person they were pursuing, and he was a fukking US citizen trying to escape the chaos created by ICE inside of the store where he was shopping. People run from danger, especially when armed men in tactical gear swarm the place.
Feds gas Chicago neighborhood, detain young Black man amid day of Southeast Side raids • The TRiiBE
For the second time in less than a week, militarized federal agents deployed tear gas in Chicago residential neighborhoods. Nearby, they detained a young Black man onlookers insisted was a U.S. citizen
I don't understand how some of you can live in this country as Black men and women and not know your rights. What you're saying is not only wrong, but extremely dangerous in its justification for violating them. You're doing the work of authoritarianism.
The Supreme Court made it clear in Illinois v. Wardlow that flight alone doesn't give police the right to detain you. They still need reasonable suspicion of a crime.
ICE CHASING DOWN ASSAILANTS AND YOU JUST RANDOMLY TAKE OFF
RUNNING FROM ICE
YET PRETENDING THIS
ISNT REASONABLE SUSPICION OF A CRIME
THE COLI...
I WANT YOU TO TAKE OFF RUNNING
THE NEXT TIME YOU SEE THE POLICE
AND TELL US WHAT HAPPENED
Pull Up the Roots
Breakfast for dinner.
Your ignorance is dangerous. Warren King wasn't an assailant. He was a Black kid shopping at Walgreens. Claiming "he ran, therefore reasonable suspicion" shows a complete misunderstanding of the law.
AND YOU JUST RANDOMLY TAKE OFF
RUNNING FROM ICE
YET PRETENDING THIS
ISNT REASONABLE SUSPICION OF A CRIME
THE COLI
I WANT YOU TO TAKE OFF RUNNING
THE NEXT TIME YOU SEE THE POLICE
AND TELL US WHAT HAPPENED
Again, the Supreme Court in Illinois v. Wardlow made it clear: flight alone does not create probable cause or justify detention. You need lawful suspicion of a crime, which ICE did *NOT* have in his case, because he's a US citizen and no crime had been committed.
The fact that a lot of you are defending and downplaying this because you hate immigrants blows my mind. Y'all are going this far to defend authoritarian overreach. Like, what the fukk is wrong with some of you?
AND YOU JUST RANDOMLY TAKE OFF
RUNNING FROM ICE
YET PRETENDING THIS
ISNT REASONABLE SUSPICION OF A CRIME
THE COLI...
I WANT YOU TO TAKE OFF RUNNING
THE NEXT TIME YOU SEE THE POLICE
AND TELL US WHAT HAPPENED
They're not cops though. They're literally on par with mall cops. A small private group of uneducated people doing nothing more than the dirty work for trump.
GTFOH WITH ALL OF
THIS PERFORMATIVE COLI POSTING.
GO RUN FROM LAW ENFORCEMENT
THE NEXT TIME YOU SEE THEM
WALKING DOWN THE STREET
AND HOLLER BACK AT US.
REGARDLESS OF HOW YOU FEEL
ABOUT THEM
THE FACT IS THEY ARE
FEDERAL LAW ENFORCEMENT
NOT ON PAR WITH MALL COPS AT ALL
K.O.N.Y
Superstar
L
Um yes they are. They are a full blown law enforcement agency. They are a type of cop. The same thing that happened with that kid is the same thing that happens all the time either the ny/la pd. But just without the “omg the sky is falling” treatment your giving to immigrants
That's really all it is. The ADOS/FBA crew let everybody know that they identify more with racist cacs than other black people of different nationalities.....while throwing the word c00n around.
“ICE policy makes clear that, “[a]s a matter of law, ICE cannot assert its civil immigration enforcement authority to arrest and/or detain a U.S. citizen.”
I did see that the aclu did state that running from them regardless of citizenship as a reason to detain somebody.
I did see that the aclu did state that running from them regardless of citizenship as a reason to detain somebody.
Pull Up the Roots
Breakfast for dinner.
No, you get the fukk outta here with your ignorant ass bullshyt that justifies state violence. Calling out illegal detention and excessive force isn't "performative," no matter how desperate you are to dismiss it. Those are facts. Everything you're saying in here is WRONG.
SO WHAT ARE WE TALKING ABOUT HERE?
Pull Up the Roots
Breakfast for dinner.
This is exactly it. They are willing to rationalize abuse of Black citizens because their priority is punishing immigrants. It's nuts.
BruhManFromTheFifthFlo
Veteran
This nikka disappeared and ain’t shown one link of one of us getting deported yetIt happened already
