If any other all-time center was getting guarded by a guard in a game 7......

nieman

Senior Member
Joined
Jun 30, 2012
Messages
17,778
Reputation
2,485
Daps
35,221
Reppin
Philly
Jokic’s has the best PR team I’ve ever seen. The way he escapes criticism and is glazed for doing basic stuff is insane.

9 shots in a game 7 as the alleged best player in the league is just pathetic.
He's foreign. They have immunity lol
 

Remote

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Aug 29, 2013
Messages
81,836
Reputation
25,204
Daps
369,587
@seraphx

All those clips you posted were due to bad entry passes and/or Caruso grabbing and holding him (which he shoud've been whistled for).

Clip #1 - You literally see Caruso pull Jokic with both hands to where he can position himself to disrupt the bad pass from Braun. The pass should've been thrown up high, never down low where a guard is closer to the floor.
Clip #2 - When Jokic is trying to post up Caruso, you can see Shai literally shadowing him so there's no room for him to get the ball. Meanwhile, Westbrook is being left open in the corner. Then when Jokic has Caruso sealed off in the paint, Westbrook throws a pass way beyond the reach of him.
Clip #3 - Cason Wallace is playing off Westbrook to help on Jokic. Yet another possession where OKC is literally ignoring Westbrook from behind the arc and using his man to shadow Jokic. Then when Westbrook gets the ball, he throws another bad pass to where Jokic has to rush a shot, grabs an offensive rebound and then Dort comes over to help strip him in the paint.

All those possessions are less about Caruso, and more about how OKC was willing to let others beat them, while making sure Jokic wouldn't get clean possessions.
I’m assuming no one addressed this response
 

Remote

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Aug 29, 2013
Messages
81,836
Reputation
25,204
Daps
369,587
I always judge players, consistently. A shame I can't say the same for this board.

:manny:

Giannis got beat 1-4 in the 1st round, and that was his first playoff win in over 1000 days. Jokic has won 7 playoff games in this postseason alone (never mind over the last 1000 days), yet somehow the smoke for him and what he failed to do to beat a better and healthier team is much greater than it was for someone who's seen on the same level as him.

It's weird as hell where Denver is forced to play a guy with a Grade 2 hamstring injury (where he couldn't even run up and down the floor) because they don't have anyone else, emphasized by having to play a 36-year-old guard who inadvertently sabotages games and another wing with a Grade 2 AC joint injury with his shoulder hanging down to the floor causing him to lose his shooting ability (his one and only value), yet we're distorting the picture of what really happened in this game to criticize Jokic against a near-70 win squad who're much, much deeper and healthier.

Just look at this possession -
54ddddddd.png


Jokic is trying to seal off Caruso, all the while Shai is literally right beside him, and then you have Wallace one step away. Three defenders right there in his vicinity.

Meanwhile, there's Westbrook and Watson both left wide open; Jokic havivng to deal with multiple defenders because his teammates can't shoot.

That was the theme of the game.
Even with photo evidence these clowns won’t acknowledge reality.
 
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
87,997
Reputation
9,803
Daps
237,329
Jokic’s has the best PR team I’ve ever seen. The way he escapes criticism and is glazed for doing basic stuff is insane.

9 shots in a game 7 as the alleged best player in the league is just pathetic.

Nike literally took a quote from Giannis about failure (after his playoff exit in 2023) and turned it into a marketing campaign. As if I need to retierate, this is the same player who's only won one playoff game in over 1000 days. Not even winning one series, I'm just talking one playoff game. When he lost 1-4 to the Pacers in the 1st round, everyone just sort of shrugged their shoulders and went about their business.

Not that it's good or bad, just an observation that someone can have the absolute minimum of playoff success over an extensive period of time and still be called the best player in the game.

On the topic of stars escaping criticism -

Unless they're weaponized coming into the league [Bron] or leading the charge of a new boom [Steph], then I don't think we're going to see the same scrutinization around players going forward, in general. The whole sensationalism around NBA fanfare isn't what it once was, due to various reasons. I think that'll only be outlined with an ever-increase in parity where it'll be almost understood that a new season will bring on a new champion. There won't be the same expectations of players winning multiple chips unless they force that expectation upon themselves.

It's why someone like Ant is less likely going to be judged under that microscope if he doesn't win (his comments about past eras, notwithstanding), purely because he doesn't want to be the face of the league and moves like it.

He's just out there to hoop and that's it.
He's foreign. They have immunity lol
Luka has been the most criticized player this postseason, so that's not entirely true. Meanwhile, Kawhi exited early (yet again), and everyone just brushed that aside as if it didn't happen. Nobody really gave a fukk about Donovan and the #1 seed Cavs when they crashed out either.

With Bron's time in the league nearing its end, I think that'll reflect in how we judge stars too (at least, the severity of the scrutiny). I think Gen Z and Gen Alpha will make sure of that, because they seem to be less invested in romanticizing the game than past generatiions are. A lot of that has to do with the environment they've grown up in, but that's another argument for another day.
 

Cladyclad

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Jun 3, 2012
Messages
46,222
Reputation
5,058
Daps
118,025
Reppin
Detroit Lions, Michigan Wolverines & LWO

Nike literally took a quote from Giannis about failure (after his playoff exit in 2023) and turned it into a marketing campaign. As if I need to retierate, this is the same player who's only won one playoff game in over 1000 days. Not even winning one series, I'm just talking one playoff game. When he lost 1-4 to the Pacers in the 1st round, everyone just sort of shrugged their shoulders and went about their business.

Not that it's good or bad, just an observation that someone can have the absolute minimum of playoff success over an extensive period of time and still be called the best player in the game.

On the topic of stars escaping criticism -

Unless they're weaponized coming into the league [Bron] or leading the charge of a new boom [Steph], then I don't think we're going to see the same scrutinization around players going forward, in general. The whole sensationalism around NBA fanfare isn't what it once was, due to various reasons. I think that'll only be outlined with an ever-increase in parity where it'll be almost understood that a new season will bring on a new champion. There won't be the same expectations of players winning multiple chips unless they force that expectation upon themselves.

It's why someone like Ant is less likely going to be judged under that microscope if he doesn't win (his comments about past eras, notwithstanding), purely because he doesn't want to be the face of the league and moves like it.

He's just out there to hoop and that's it.

Luka has been the most criticized player this postseason, so that's not entirely true. Meanwhile, Kawhi exited early (yet again), and everyone just brushed that aside as if it didn't happen. Nobody really gave a fukk about Donovan and the #1 seed Cavs when they crashed out either.

With Bron's time in the league nearing its end, I think that'll reflect in how we judge stars too (at least, the severity of the scrutiny). I think Gen Z and Gen Alpha will make sure of that, because they seem to be less invested in romanticizing the game than past generatiions are. A lot of that has to do with the environment they've grown up in, but that's another argument for another day.

Don’t put Greek in this shyt. He literally had one of the best series I ever saw. He had trash all around him
 

Remote

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Aug 29, 2013
Messages
81,836
Reputation
25,204
Daps
369,587
Don’t put Greek in this shyt. He literally had one of the best series I ever saw. He had trash all around him
You saw the Bucks and Nuggets play and somehow you thought one guy was surrounded by trash and the other guy had a stacked and healthy team?

I mean posts like this explain the flaw and outright failure of this “eye test” that so many foolish people like to blather on about.
 

Cladyclad

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Jun 3, 2012
Messages
46,222
Reputation
5,058
Daps
118,025
Reppin
Detroit Lions, Michigan Wolverines & LWO
You saw the Bucks and Nuggets play and somehow you thought one guy was surrounded by trash and the other guy had a stacked and healthy team?

I mean posts like this explain the flaw and outright failure of this “eye test” that so many foolish people like to blather on about.
dude had 3 sub 40% games. Idgaf who you surrounded by. If Joker had 40 20 games and lost. I would understand. But Joker was part of why they lost. Giannis dominated and just lost
 
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
87,997
Reputation
9,803
Daps
237,329
Don’t put Greek in this shyt. He literally had one of the best series I ever saw. He had trash all around him
You haven't seen too many series' if that's what you're judging to be "one of the best", especially with how it unfolded in OT of that elimination game.

And when you're deemed to be the best player in the league, then expectations have to follow suit. That means performing in the postseason and having success, so regardless of whatever measurements you're using for Giannis, winning one playoff game in over 1000 days doesn't do him any favors in that debate.

Over that same time frame Jokic has won 30 playoff games. That's 30x the amount that Giannis has won.

Yet one player has been scrutinized considerably more than the other. This is why threads like this bewilder me when nobody has had more playoff success over the last three seasons than Jokic, yet we're still trying to nitpick at what he's doing or isn't doing, completely disregarding all context as to why it's happening. The same energy isn't being kept for other stars (some even regarded as being better than him).
dude had 3 sub 40% games. Idgaf who you surrounded by. If Joker had 40 20 games and lost. I would understand. But Joker was part of why they lost. Giannis dominated and just lost
Jokic dominated against Minny last season (and lost), putting up those kind of numbers you speak of, yet it still didn't stop folks from dragging him. It's almost like whatever stats he puts up doesn't stop those from criticizing him whenever he loses.

If you lose in the playoffs, then you're ultimately part of the reason why your team loses, dominating or not.

And Jokic shooting inefficiently in a playoff game is an extreme outlier, so yes, while he should be expected to shoot better, it's not like you can curate an argument around those isolated games where he's inefficient as if he should be damned for it. If this was a regular occurence for him in the postseason, then yes, damn away, but it's not.

Just to put it into perspective:

Jokic during his playoff career - 27 ppg on 57 eFG%
Giannis during his playoff career - 27 ppg on 55 eFG%.
 

Cladyclad

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Jun 3, 2012
Messages
46,222
Reputation
5,058
Daps
118,025
Reppin
Detroit Lions, Michigan Wolverines & LWO
You haven't seen too many series' if that's what you're judging to be "one of the best", especially with how it unfolded in OT of that elimination game.

And when you're deemed to be the best player in the league, then expectations have to follow suit. That means performing in the postseason and having success, so regardless of whatever measurements you're using for Giannis, winning one playoff game in over 1000 days doesn't do him any favors in that debate.

Over that same time frame Jokic has won 30 playoff games. That's 30x the amount that Giannis has won.

Yet one player has been scrutinized considerably more than the other. This is why threads like this bewilder me when nobody has had more playoff success over the last three seasons than Jokic, yet we're still trying to nitpick at what he's doing or isn't doing, completely disregarding all context as to why it's happening. The same energy isn't being kept for other stars (some even regarded as being better than him).

Jokic dominated against Minny last season (and lost), putting up those kind of numbers you speak of, yet it still didn't stop folks from dragging him. It's almost like whatever stats he puts up doesn't stop those from criticizing him whenever he loses.

If you lose in the playoffs, then you're ultimately part of the reason why your team loses, dominating or not.

And Jokic shooting inefficiently in a playoff game is an extreme outlier, so yes, while he should be expected to shoot better, it's not like you can curate an argument around those isolated games where he's inefficient as if he should be damned for it. If this was a regular occurence for him in the postseason, then yes, damn away, but it's not.

Just to put it into perspective:

Jokic during his playoff career - 27 ppg on 57 eFG%
Giannis during his playoff career - 27 ppg on 55 eFG%.
I’m not talking about last playoffs

im talking this playoffs
 

JYoung24

Young J
Joined
May 30, 2012
Messages
7,906
Reputation
-815
Daps
6,429
Reppin
NULL
Was always silly, and never made sense. He was being propped up by the national media and certain analytic guys in large part because he’s white and “wholesome” to some

Right smack in the middle of your prime as the best player in the world and going out with a whimper

If people are gonna be saying he’s the greatest offensive peak ever, we gotta start judging him like that

Prime Curry ain’t going down like that in an elimination game

Prime MJ ain’t going down like that in an elimination game

Prime LeBron ain’t going down like that in an elimination game

Kobe would be in that discussion too but he would do chit like not shoot in the 2nd half of game 7 so he can’t be up there
Hes not the best player in the world
 
Top