IF being Gay is Genetic

[rapbeats]

Not to mention there is more to genetics than genotype. You dont know what couldve happened in his development or his environmental circumstances.

dont you say that out loud. the gay gestapo will hunt you down. environmental circumstances like being diddle by a man at a very young age ......but let you ask them that one. they will swear that is not what can happen. even though i've heard that story a many of time from gay folks own mouths. not all but enough.

what like some little girl being diddle or raped at a very young age by men. therefore she cant even imagine being attracted to men ever in life in a romantic way. there two ways these type or girls go most of the time. and thats they turn super promiscuous with guys or they end up turning to be with females. there are the others that make up a 3rd group that figure away how to cope without doing either.

 

[thekingsmen]

dont you say that out loud. the gay gestapo will hunt you down. environmental circumstances like being diddle by a man at a very young age ......but let you ask them that one. they will swear that is not what can happen. even though i've heard that story a many of time from gay folks own mouths. not all but enough.

what like some little girl being diddle or raped at a very young age by men. therefore she cant even imagine being attracted to men ever in life in a romantic way. there two ways these type or girls go most of the time. and thats they turn super promiscuous with guys or they end up turning to be with females. there are the others that make up a 3rd group that figure away how to cope without doing either.

They scared of that b.

 

[NoMayo15]

A lot of bullshyt anecdotes being presented as demonstrable fact in here.

 

[Domingo Halliburton]

I didnt read this thread. But seriously....what about gay people makes you hate them so much? Everytime something gay is brought up these threads go multiple pages.

 

[thekingsmen]

I didnt read this thread. But seriously....what about gay people makes you hate them so much? Everytime something gay is brought up these threads go multiple pages.

This is where you went wrong. Hating Gays isn't about denying their genetic make-up even though there is no science to back that up, hating gays is a separate subject from this thread. People who deny the lifestyle as a "born trait" are those who know that is a gender breaking agenda. I think your question should be changed.

 

[DEAD7]

there's a genetic link not a full allelic phenotype

link to study?

 

[DEAD7]

Extremely random bump, but I was discussing this with an openly gay co-worker, and he's managed to convince me its not genetic.
Was there an actual study? or was this thread just more anti gay bullsh*t?

 

[ghostwriterx]

Extremely random bump, but I was discussing this with an openly gay co-worker, and he's managed to convince me its not genetic.
Was there an actual study? or was this thread just more anti gay bullsh*t?

How did he convince you of this?

 

[tmonster]

http://www.worldpolicy.newschool.edu/wpi/globalrights/sexorient/twins.html

 

[DEAD7]

How did he convince you of this?

It was a rather long conversation, and I wont be able to make his point nearly as well as he did but, but basically we agreed that there is a genetic predisposition to homosexuality. Just as there are genetic dispositions to obesity.
All forms of gluttony and hypersensitivity to stimulus have generic dispositions.

But to say some one is 'born gay' he asserted is wholly false.

Everyone is heterosexual by default. But a heterosexual man who gets a blowjob from a man and is pleasured by it MAY, if predisposed genetically, find the pleasure of it is more appealing than the lack of functionality.

I was able to agree with the idea that human preference need not be so "digital". We aren't computers. Yes/No on/off 1/0 etc. we are analog creatures and exist in shades.

We aren't done with discussion, but he made a strong enough case to sway me.

 

[Everythingg]

Even if its genetic (and its not) its no different than a disease. Yea I said it lol... If a disease is genetic, we dont leave the disease untreated. And yea people may say "but... but... but.. Its not hurting anyone!" but the one who will judge them doesnt agree with that notion

 

[ghostwriterx]

It was a rather long conversation, and I wont be able to make his point nearly as well as he did but, but basically we agreed that there is a genetic predisposition to homosexuality. Just as there are genetic dispositions to obesity.
All forms of gluttony and hypersensitivity to stimulus have generic dispositions.

But to say some one is 'born gay' he asserted is wholly false.

Everyone is heterosexual by default. But a heterosexual man who gets a blowjob from a man and is pleasured by it MAY, if predisposed genetically, find the pleasure of it is more appealing than the lack of functionality.

I was able to agree with the idea that human preference need not be so "digital". We aren't computers. Yes/No on/off 1/0 etc. we are analog creatures and exist in shades.

We aren't done with discussion, but he made a strong enough case to sway me.

Hmm, that doesn't sound very scientific.
How does a "heterosexual by default" male find himself in a situation where he's receiving oral sex from a man?
Seems pretty clear you would have to be aroused by the idea before you "know" what it feels like.

 

[Liu Kang]

Extremely random bump, but I was discussing this with an openly gay co-worker, and he's managed to convince me its not genetic.
Was there an actual study? or was this thread just more anti gay bullsh*t?

It was a rather long conversation, and I wont be able to make his point nearly as well as he did but, but basically we agreed that there is a genetic predisposition to homosexuality. Just as there are genetic dispositions to obesity.
All forms of gluttony and hypersensitivity to stimulus have generic dispositions.

But to say some one is 'born gay' he asserted is wholly false.

Everyone is heterosexual by default. But a heterosexual man who gets a blowjob from a man and is pleasured by it MAY, if predisposed genetically, find the pleasure of it is more appealing than the lack of functionality.

I was able to agree with the idea that human preference need not be so "digital". We aren't computers. Yes/No on/off 1/0 etc. we are analog creatures and exist in shades.

We aren't done with discussion, but he made a strong enough case to sway me.

Which one is it ?

 

[DEAD7]

Which one is it ?

The difference is its, a choice, you aren't "born gay".
Being genetically predisposed to alcoholism, or obesity doesnt mean... awww f*ck it never mind. I'm just here looking for more info on it, not to argue it one way or the other lol
I think its an interesting topic.


edit: I should have said "born gay" instead of genetic in the first post you quoted.

 

[DEAD7]

Hmm, that doesn't sound very scientific.
How does a "heterosexual by default" male find himself in a situation where he's receiving oral sex from a man?
Seems pretty clear you would have to be aroused by the idea before you "know" what it feels like.

A predisposed man would likely be curious