If C-Span get lit like this I'm gonna watch every day

[Kiyoshi-Dono]

 

[melraH]

They used to scrap before the civil war. That’s partly what caused it, racist congress member slave owners were threatening their peers

They were running up on people for fades for bringing up slavery

Knowledge reigns supreme

 

[David_TheMan]

so we're insulting now.

meanwhile stating bullets killed people the same rate, however EFFECTIVE range, which would then make one more effective than the other.

fukk a book, I have a server goofy... we want to go there?

Lol, effective range is distance, so no it wouldn't make the impact of the bullet more effective you would more likely die back then from a bullet shot for the reasons I stated before.

Having a server means nothing it literally means nothing, especially if you aren't saying you have a server full of books

Use Google though and do some basic research on how deadly firearms were in the 1800s.

 

[Saysumthinfunnymike]

I don't know about now but if this was the 70s or 80s the Teamsters would have Markwayne resting easy in a ditch somewhere

 

[MrLogic]

I don't what it is but almost like a veil just came off on politics



i'm here for it

 

[ChatGPT-5]

Lol, effective range is distance, so no it wouldn't make the impact of the bullet more effective you would more likely die back then from a bullet shot for the reasons I stated before.

Having a server means nothing it literally means nothing, especially if you aren't saying you have a server full of books

Use Google though and do some basic research on how deadly firearms were in the 1800s.

ok


In terms of raw damage potential, modern bullets are typically more destructive than their 1800s counterparts due to the following reasons:

1. Higher Velocity: Modern bullets are fired at higher velocities, which translates to more kinetic energy and greater potential for tissue damage.
2. Advanced Design: Hollow-point bullets, for example, are designed to expand upon entering a target, increasing the diameter of the wound channel.
3. Precision: Modern firearms and bullets are more accurate, which can result in bullets striking more vital areas.
4. Energy Transfer: Modern bullets are better at transferring kinetic energy to the target, which can result in more significant tissue disruption.

and you have the audacity to call someone a retard. you think fukking bullets of TODAY don't have more damage of the fukkING 1800s. you stupid fukking clown.

I didnt insult you once prior to this, but now you wanna be a fukking muppet and act like you know some shyt, so now you're going to converse with my AI. dumb fukk.

 

[David_TheMan]

ok


In terms of raw damage potential, modern bullets are typically more destructive than their 1800s counterparts due to the following reasons:

1. Higher Velocity: Modern bullets are fired at higher velocities, which translates to more kinetic energy and greater potential for tissue damage.
2. Advanced Design: Hollow-point bullets, for example, are designed to expand upon entering a target, increasing the diameter of the wound channel.
3. Precision: Modern firearms and bullets are more accurate, which can result in bullets striking more vital areas.
4. Energy Transfer: Modern bullets are better at transferring kinetic energy to the target, which can result in more significant tissue disruption.

and you have the audacity to call someone a retard. you think fukking bullets of TODAY don't have more damage of the fukkING 1800s. you stupid fukking clown.

I didnt insult you once prior to this, but now you wanna be a fukking ronald mcdonald and act like you know some shyt, so now you're going to converse with my AI. dumb fukk.

The greater benefit today is greater effective range

They overcame poor ballistic design by having bigger bullets, so while they had less velocity than 9mm today the made up for it in being larger calibers

So again read a book.


On top of that again due to their poor ability to cut wind they dumped all their energy at impact and fragmented, so your basic ball would function like a hollow point in terms of energy transfer on target

 

[ChatGPT-5]

The greater benefit today is greater effective range

They overcame poor ballistic design by having bigger bullets, so while they had less velocity than 9mm today the made up for it in being larger calibers

So again read a book.


On top of that again due to their poor ability to cut wind they dumped all their energy at impact and fragmented, so your basic ball would function like a hollow point in terms of energy transfer on target

Modern ammunition benefits from over a century of advancements in chemistry, physics, and manufacturing techniques. These improvements include more stable and powerful propellants, better materials for the bullet itself, and sophisticated designs that allow for controlled expansion, penetration, and energy transfer. Modern ballistics also benefit from a better understanding of aerodynamics, which has led to the development of bullets with shapes that maintain velocity over greater distances and improve accuracy.

The design of modern ammunition involves a careful balance between penetration, energy transfer, and the minimization of collateral damage. This balance is tailored to specific uses, such as military combat, law enforcement, hunting, and sport shooting. While bullets from the 1800s were effective for their time, modern bullets are far more versatile and efficient.

 

[Wild self]

But TLR said that the GOP is organized, united, and masculine

 

[David_TheMan]

Modern ammunition benefits from over a century of advancements in chemistry, physics, and manufacturing techniques. These improvements include more stable and powerful propellants, better materials for the bullet itself, and sophisticated designs that allow for controlled expansion, penetration, and energy transfer. Modern ballistics also benefit from a better understanding of aerodynamics, which has led to the development of bullets with shapes that maintain velocity over greater distances and improve accuracy.

The design of modern ammunition involves a careful balance between penetration, energy transfer, and the minimization of collateral damage. This balance is tailored to specific uses, such as military combat, law enforcement, hunting, and sport shooting. While bullets from the 1800s were effective for their time, modern bullets are far more versatile and efficient.

The most popular handgun round was made in the world, 9mm was developed and first made over 100 years ago. Lol. In 1901.

45acp was devloped afterwards in 1905.

The gap you see in small arms ammo is incremental since then.

That said I've said everything that needs to be said.

We don't have to be hypothetical about it.

Go here

https://www.davide-pedersoli.com/en/product/kentucky-pistol-flintlock-model

Buy a flintlock black powder pistol, 45 caliber , like Andrew Jackson used. You can get black powder guns sent to your home. Buy some lead shot and powder and shyt yourself in the chest with it .

You should have nothing to worry about if what you posted , you believe, right?

 

[zayk35]

Is dude really arguing with the A.I. now

 

[Samori Toure]

A Republican Congressman from Tennessee claimed that Kevin McCarthy hit him with an elbow yesterday, because the Congressman had voted to throw McCarthy out of the speakership.

 

[ChatGPT-5]

Buy a flintlock black powder pistol, 45 caliber , like Andrew Jackson used. You can get black powder guns sent to your home. Buy some lead shot and powder and shyt yourself in the chest with it .

You should have nothing to worry about if what you posted , you believe, right?

and you think this is more deadly than a present day firearm? that is what you are fukking telling me?

 

[ScoopNScore]

Hmm. You like that don’t you. Threats of violence is like an aroma of excitement for women.

WOW
Really man?

Was a time when the flirting bit on this forum was a game and an artform but this just sounds like he's outside her house with binoculars

 

[Illuminatos]

Adults are lowkey just grown ass children.

*Casanova voice*
“Hope that don’t go over your head!”