If China and Russia joined together to create the successor to the soviet union

How fukked is America?

  • Not fukked at all. We beat them once, we'll do it again.

    Votes: 15 48.4%
  • We're too divided and our leadership is too compromised. We're fukked.

    Votes: 10 32.3%
  • I don't want to think about this. I'm too stressed out as it is.

    Votes: 6 19.4%

  • Total voters
    31

MikelArteta

Moderator
Staff member
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
264,707
Reputation
35,000
Daps
808,229
Reppin
Goatganda the pearl of Africa
Nothing lasts forever. For centuries, cacs have put Asia and Africa down through imperialism and warfare.

Now, that the playing field has been increasingly made even through technological dispersion (India and China have nuclear weapons, for instance) - cacs are running scared.

"China is a threat!"
"India will become a threat!"
"Africans are having too many children!"

Everything that Coli American nationalists support is in favour of white supremacy. They just don't know it yet...

:banderas:
Us could barely handle vietnam, afghanistan and iraq but listen to the coli and china and russia would be overrun in a week :mjlol:
 
Joined
Apr 3, 2014
Messages
71,910
Reputation
17,418
Daps
306,499
:banderas:
Us could barely handle vietnam, afghanistan and iraq but listen to the coli and china and russia would be overrun in a week :mjlol:




If we went to war with China and Russia, it wouldn't be a nation building mission. It would be a war of empires. We'd take out our big guns for that.

The mistake that the US makes in Vietnam, Afghanistan and Iraq is that we don't want to be seen as the villain, as the big nation bullying smaller states and absolutely annihilating them.

We wouldn't be concerned about our image if it was us going against China or Russia :demonic:
 

Rembrandt

the artist
Joined
Jan 13, 2016
Messages
15,353
Reputation
2,690
Daps
40,641
Reppin
Villa Diodati
:banderas:
Us could barely handle vietnam, afghanistan and iraq but listen to the coli and china and russia would be overrun in a week :mjlol:

A crazy take that doesn't even understand what happened.

Act like an actual world war would be the same as bullshyt invasions where we still destroyed 3/3 countries and left more orphans in Vietnam than US soldiers killed.

Not justifying anything but it would be a massacre
 

Rembrandt

the artist
Joined
Jan 13, 2016
Messages
15,353
Reputation
2,690
Daps
40,641
Reppin
Villa Diodati
in the us as well

To an extent, but at least we've showed an ability to fight unlike Russia who got exposed for their paper tiger army and China, who actually hasn't even fought a modern war yet. They got fukked by us, then lost to Indiaa, Vietnam and the Soviet union. Their large army is expected to have less than half of those people war ready, not to even mention how fukkin bad it would get with our jets and their lack of air superiority.
 

Swirv

Superstar
Supporter
Joined
Jul 1, 2012
Messages
17,720
Reputation
3,051
Daps
56,082
Wouldn’t make much difference, most western government countries are pretty much fully aligned anyway.
 

Scustin Bieburr

Baby baybee baybee UUUGH
Joined
May 3, 2012
Messages
23,574
Reputation
13,241
Daps
136,543
They won't join into a single nation-state, but it's looking like they will become a strategic alliance, which will be a serious problem for the West. Individually the West can manage and contain if push came to shove, together they effectively cancel out most of each other's biggest weaknesses.
NATO still exists even though the Warsaw pact was dissolved and there's no longer a soviet union.

So it makes sense that Russia and China would try to make their own counter to NATO. China has been focused on making big investments in technology especially chip technology that is used in cars, smart phones, weapons systems etc.

What happens if they start sharing that tech with Russia and North Korea and the three of them start working together to push boundaries in technology with military applications. We still here debating on whether women should be allowed to get abortions while China is putting billions into fusion tech and renewable energy.

If we keeping it 100% the soviets put in work in the space race. They were first with most milestones right up until the moon landing. I get the feeling that it's going to be China that puts out the first working nuclear fusion reactor and will be the first to crack the code on a technology that will actually reverse climate change. That's going to draw more countries into their orbit. We're becoming a global laughing stock while those rice cacs are pushing the envelope after stealing the fundamentals from American tech giants :francis:
 

Black Magisterialness

Moderna Boi
Supporter
Joined
May 23, 2012
Messages
20,203
Reputation
4,259
Daps
49,169
NATO still exists even though the Warsaw pact was dissolved and there's no longer a soviet union.

So it makes sense that Russia and China would try to make their own counter to NATO. China has been focused on making big investments in technology especially chip technology that is used in cars, smart phones, weapons systems etc.

What happens if they start sharing that tech with Russia and North Korea and the three of them start working together to push boundaries in technology with military applications. We still here debating on whether women should be allowed to get abortions while China is putting billions into fusion tech and renewable energy.

If we keeping it 100% the soviets put in work in the space race. They were first with most milestones right up until the moon landing. I get the feeling that it's going to be China that puts out the first working nuclear fusion reactor and will be the first to crack the code on a technology that will actually reverse climate change. That's going to draw more countries into their orbit. We're becoming a global laughing stock while those rice cacs are pushing the envelope after stealing the fundamentals from American tech giants :francis:

That last paragraph is key. Not because of the nuclear fusion thing, but because of their soft-power orbit. China been diving into Africa, South Asia and else where with massive creditor/debtor relationships that can fukk over all sorts of efforts to get foot holds in the far east.

Strategically, Russia is kinda fukked. Their entire military has been decimated. They can't deploy on multiple fronts, their country is literally too big. They have no naval presence to speak of and they'd have to open their culo to China to make ends meet. Which is what we are seeing now. China would be the forerunner of such an alliance. The only thing I see fukking that over though, is NATO is strong as fukk. Really strong. Combine that with Australia's position in the pacific, America's presence in the Middle east and Europe's position in the north and China would be forced to either use ICBMs or a naval landing on the west coast or Alaska and that would be literal suicide.
People don't understand that the US's position between the oceans is the single biggest barrier to invasion. And it was doubly smart to establish shyt like NAFTA which keeps our direct neighbors on our side. China ain't about to come through Mexico or Canada and not get fukked over by a North American JTF.

The only question mark in this hypothetical world war is South America. Which I personally think would join with the West.
 

Insensitive

Superstar
Joined
May 21, 2012
Messages
12,592
Reputation
4,945
Daps
43,164
Reppin
NULL
Russia isn't communist isn't anymore.

Why would they link up and make a "New Soviet Union"?
Do you know ANYTHING about contemporary Russia? They're a capitalist
nation doing Capitalist Nation things.
 

Vandelay

Life is absurd. Lean into it.
Joined
Apr 14, 2013
Messages
27,116
Reputation
8,058
Daps
99,437
Reppin
Phi Chi Connection
NATO still exists even though the Warsaw pact was dissolved and there's no longer a soviet union.

So it makes sense that Russia and China would try to make their own counter to NATO. China has been focused on making big investments in technology especially chip technology that is used in cars, smart phones, weapons systems etc.

What happens if they start sharing that tech with Russia and North Korea and the three of them start working together to push boundaries in technology with military applications. We still here debating on whether women should be allowed to get abortions while China is putting billions into fusion tech and renewable energy.

If we keeping it 100% the soviets put in work in the space race. They were first with most milestones right up until the moon landing. I get the feeling that it's going to be China that puts out the first working nuclear fusion reactor and will be the first to Crack the code on a technology that will actually reverse climate change. That's going to draw more countries into their orbit.
I disagree with the bolded, but agree with almost everything else. I think the US beats China to fusion...we already had major news reports on this in the last 3 months. I think the US beats China to AI; midJourney and ChatGPT show you what can be done in the public realm, I also think the US beats China to quantum computing. The US's problem is we invent this shyt, and then DO NOTHING with it due to the bureaucracy.

Russia, China, DPRK...toss in Iran and Saudia Arabia I could see forming a union. Everyone of those countries have glaring weaknesses that will make them permanently subordinate to the US given the status quo.
  • Russia, is broke and undergoing a population timebomb.
  • China, has a slowing, shaky economy, devoid of resources internally capable of sustaining its current size coupled with an authoritarian regime that their rapidly shrinking population won't stand for if the economy slows too much. Moreover, their military isn't battle tested.
  • DPRK, is a failed pariah state that can't show its face on the world stage, so they have pop off with nuclear rhetoric everytime someone invalidates their existence.
  • Iran, authoritarian regime that is dangerously close to their own population rising against them and really don't possess the knowledge or weaponry to hold it down without external help.
  • Saudi Arabia, single-sourced economy that will be in serious trouble when and IF...and its a big IF the rest of the world moves away from oil. Tourism will not sustain them.
But together they cancel out the worst of each and have the ability to be each others crutches. If they can check their egos momentarily while the US fractures from the inside and Europe declines demonstratively over the next 30 years, who knows.

I don't want this scenario, but the US can't get their head out of their ass and might take several steps back due to sheer bigotry and bureaucratic gridlock. The strange irony is, common enemy may unite the US and it's allies in ways not seen in a long time. Funny how you need a clear and present danger, not an ambiguous one to get your shyt together.

Personally, I think China is playing both sides and has their eyes on far eastern Siberia should Russia fracture into multiple states. They will play both hands.
 
Last edited:

Scustin Bieburr

Baby baybee baybee UUUGH
Joined
May 3, 2012
Messages
23,574
Reputation
13,241
Daps
136,543
I disagree with the bolded, but agree with almost everything else. I think the US beats China to fusion...we already had major news reports on this in the last 3 months. I think the US beats China to AI; midJourney and ChatGPT show you what can be done in the public realm, I also think the US beats China to quantum computing. The US's problem is we invent this shyt, and then DO NOTHING with it due to the bureaucracy.

Russia, China, DPRK...toss in Iran and Saudia Arabia I could see forming a union. Everyone of those countries have glaring weaknesses that will make them permanently subordinate to the US given the status quo.
  • Russia, is broke and undergoing a population timebomb.
  • China, has a slowing, shaky economy, devoid of resources internally capable of sustaining its current size coupled with an authoritarian regime that their rapidly shrinking population won't stand for if the economy slows too much.
  • DPRK, is a failed pariah state that can't show its face on the world stage, so they have pop off with nuclear rhetoric everytime someone invalidates their existence.
  • Iran, authoritarian regime that is dangerously close to their own population rising against them and really don't possess the knowledge or weaponry to hold it down without external help.
  • Saudi Arabia, single-sourced economy that will be in serious trouble when and IF...and its a big IF the rest of the world moves away from oil. Tourism will not sustain them.
But together they cancel out the worst of each and have the ability to be each others crutches. If they can check their egos momentarily while the US fractures from the inside and Europe declines demonstratively over the next 30 years, who knows.

I don't want this scenario, but the US can't get their head out of their ass and might take several steps back due to sheer bigotry and bureaucratic gridlock. The strange irony is, common enemy may unite the US and it's allies in ways not seen in a long time. Funny how you need a clear and present danger, not an ambiguous one to get your shyt together.

Personally, I think China is playing both sides and has their eyes on far eastern Siberia should Russia fracture into multiple states. They will play both hands.
Well you're raising a point here that shows how China could be in the position to create an alliance where they're at the head and finance it for the most part. Russia and Saudi Arabia will need people to buy their petroleum which can be used for manufacturing. That's China and Russia right there. Russia has fallen off technologically, so China can give them the boost they need to get their schools and rebuild their tech sector. North Korea needs food, and Russia has tons of land that can be used for this. Africa and Latin America are big deals when it comes to labor because they have the youngest populations growing the fastest. If China can get Africans on their side, and can actually let go of their racism they can bring in millions of Africans and Latinos to revitalize their aging population. If they have agreements with free movement similar to the EU, and again if these other countries can let go of their racism, it will be massive boost to their manufacturing capacity and they'll have millions of scientists graduating each year.

If they all leave their egos at the door and actually come together they'll be a strong military and technological threat. Especially if they're manufacturing electronics that are cheaper, stronger, and last longer. A lot of the shyt we take for granted is thanks to things like DARPA and without the soviet boogeyman, America has basically been entirely dependent on these silicon Valley clowns to keep America competitive. But with managers like Elon Musk and Mark Zuckerberg it's not looking good. ChatGPT is a breakthrough, but you already know China has stolen that shyt and will put billions in govt funding to make a remix that's hotter than the original. If China cracks A.I., quantum computing, and renewable energy in 20 years, they can use this soft power to win over other nations and then America will be dependent on China's well funded tech sector for our technology.


shyt isn't looking good for us while we still have these religious zealots and fat cats in office who don't give a shyt about science or education. We need to get them out of the paint immediately because China and Europe are trying to go to the 2067 while we have clowns in office trying to take us back to 1767.
 

CopiousX

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Dec 15, 2019
Messages
15,336
Reputation
5,378
Daps
75,414
I think its also worth mentioning that the two egos of both nations would never allow it. Chariman Mao couldnt even ally himself with Stalin before falling out ; so i doubt supreme leader xi and emperor Putin will work together as a nation even if it was their only chance . Putin would backstab Xi inless than a week:russ:





In U.S.-Led Iraq War, Iran Was the Big Winner

When can we discuss the full consequences of the Iraq War?

2 trillion wasted and America’s weaknesses on full display around the world

Incorrect, sir. I think you meant to say 2trillion invested into American jobs.:troll:
 

Nkrumah Was Right

Superstar
Joined
Mar 11, 2022
Messages
12,245
Reputation
2,010
Daps
35,744
I think its also worth mentioning that the two egos of both nations would never allow it. Chariman Mao couldnt even ally himself with Stalin before falling out ; so i doubt supreme leader xi and emperor Putin will work together as a nation even if it was their only chance . Putin would backstab Xi inless than a week:russ:







Incorrect, sir. I think you meant to say 2trillion invested into American jobs.:troll:

Mao and the USSR’s falling out was more complicated.

Mao initially looked to Stalin as a mentor. After all, the Soviets provided some support to the People’s Liberation Army during the Chinese Civil War. However, there were doctrinal disagreements on the application of communism.

During the Korean War, Stalin provided Soviet pilots and other supports when China fought the US and other UN forces for nearly 3 years.

After Stalin’s death, tensions really started to grow between the USSR and PRC which led to border skirmishes and competing foreign policy objectives vis-a-vis Vietnam, for instance.
 
Top