If evolution is real, why is there only one type of human?

[CarbonBraddock]

plus we are diff.. there surviving adult humans that weigh half a ton... or less than 100 pounds... that jump high and run fast... breh

every human can jump, you don't understand the basic premise of the thread.

 

[CarbonBraddock]

Humans evolved from creatures who abandoned the water a long, long time before hand.

Evolution don't work backwards.

Devolution (biology) - Wikipedia

tell me more about the direction of evolution breh

 

[BoogeyMan]

The answer to this is simple: Human nikkas were only allowed to evolve in linear line. It's like a tree with only one branch.

 

[HearNoEvil]

Devolution (biology) - Wikipedia

tell me more about the direction of evolution breh

Did you actually read what you just linked us to, homie?

 

[HabitualChiller]

Since no one is going to correct OP: NO species of turtle is able to breathe underwater; they do not have gills, so that shyt ain't happening.

 

[Low End Derrick]

there were more types of human, but we killed them off

 

[CarbonBraddock]

Since no one is going to correct OP: NO species of turtle is able to breathe underwater; they do not have gills, so that shyt ain't happening.

wow guy, you're so incredible and intelligent. regardless of whether they are literally breathing underwater or not, the thread premise holds up, some turtles cannot be underwater for a long time while others can. humans should be the same way.

 

[CarbonBraddock]

Did you actually read what you just linked us to, homie?

you said that humans evolved from beings that abandoned water and that evolution doesn't 'work backwards.' if something happened that created people that could live underwater, which is entirely possible, you would try to move the goalposts and say it was only evolution in another direction. this is why there can be no true discourse with your type, bc you do not even have the tools to begin with.

 

[Savvir]

I have a better question. Can the second law of thermodynamics and evolution co-exist? Why does the theory of evolution seem to work of against the laws of entropy?

the theory of evolution relies on failures to adapt as much as it relies on successful adaptation....
a failure to adapt = death = entropy
there are more extinct species than there are species alive...
how does that go against entropy?

 

[YouMadd?]

Come on now... read about Hominids... at one point there was more than one upright walking human like creature on earth at the same time...

Does this mean evolution is 100% true? No.... but atleast read up on the full theory and paleobiology...

 

[YouMadd?]

I have a better question. Can the second law of thermodynamics and evolution co-exist? Why does the theory of evolution seem to work of against the laws of entropy?

Now this is a question that should be pondered....

 

[YouMadd?]

Was watching a video on crabs and began some research. Apparently, not all crabs can breathe underwater, only some can. The same is true with turtles. Well this got me to thinkin, a land crab and a water crab are the same creature, but they can do drastically different things. The White Man's science tells us that this is possible bc some of the crabs 'learned' to live in the water. Well, why, in BILLIONS of years, has no group of humans 'learned' to live in the most abundant place on the planet? The earth is mostly water. It only makes sense to live in water and not land. The opposite would be like going into a bathroom at WalMart and peeing in the sink when there's all the stalls and shyt just sittin there. Where are all the water-breathin humans like in Aquaman, or the humans who have night vision cause they lived in caves for thousands of years? So, this new evidence is pretty damning to evolution and I don't see how we can take science very seriously after i've revealed it. If they will lie/be wrong about this, then who knows what else they've been deceiving us on. Can thecoli even understand what the fukk i just typed? I be on here dropping mad science/philosophical napalm and the shyt just goes to waste, but we'll see. Discuss.

Maybe the people haven’t evolved to be under water, “yet”.....

Only a small percentage of the human population can “free dive” hundreds of feet under water...

Maybe that is the beginning of this evolution....

 

[HabitualChiller]

wow guy, you're so incredible and intelligent. regardless of whether they are literally breathing underwater or not, the thread premise holds up, some turtles cannot be underwater for a long time while others can. humans should be the same way.

Tell me when and where you stated this because in order for it to be a premise, it would have to have been stated somewhere in your opening post. This is what you originally posted:

Apparently, not all crabs can breathe underwater, only some can. The same is true with turtles.

You moving goalposts now, breh? We ain't even got to page two, yet buddy already juelzing.

 

[OH SOHH TRILL]

Damn that was easy

This chart is as fukk. All the monkeys brown but homo sapien mad beige. GTFOH.

 

[CarbonBraddock]

Tell me when and where you stated this because in order for it to be a premise, it would have to have been stated somewhere in your opening post. This is what you originally posted:


You moving goalposts now, breh? We ain't even got to page two, yet buddy already juelzing.

try to keep up, i know you're very young and your brain hasn't likely fully developed yet. not every turtle on the planet can hold its breath for hours or days at a time like sea turtles can. regardless of whether they're actually breathing underwater or not, there is a clear separation of abilities when it comes to turtles. it's not complicated to understand. i didn't move any goalposts, but received incorrect information, but even so, the incorrect information doesn't change what i said originally. there are animals that are the same, yet have drastically different abilities, yet we don't see the same in humans.