If evolution is real, why is there only one type of human?

[CarbonBraddock]

Maybe the people haven’t evolved to be under water, “yet”.....

Only a small percentage of the human population can “free dive” hundreds of feet under water...

Maybe that is the beginning of this evolution....

so, after BIILLIONS of years, on a planet that is basically a hundred percent water, we have just now began evolving to be able to live in water?

 

[HabitualChiller]

try to keep up, i know you're very young and your brain hasn't likely fully developed yet. not every turtle on the planet can hold its breath for hours or days at a time like sea turtles can. regardless of whether they're actually breathing underwater or not, there is a clear separation of abilities when it comes to turtles. it's not complicated to understand. i didn't move any goalposts, but received incorrect information, but even so, the incorrect information doesn't change what i said originally. there are animals that are the same, yet have drastically different abilities, yet we don't see the same in humans.

This is somewhat correct, but the thing is: why should I take you and your question seriously when you can't even do a basic fact check?

You can ask a question and request an answer, so I'll do the same.

 

[Food Mane]

This is 100% baseless, I have no facts or knowledge about this but I have wondered if autistic people are an evolutionary jump that is in it's early stages

 

[CarbonBraddock]

This is somewhat correct, but the thing is: why should I take you and your question seriously when you can't even do a basic fact check?

You can ask a question and request an answer, so I'll do the same.

no comebacks:adjlfksjfskf:when they're frantically searching for something, ANYTHING to say to overcome my impeccable logic. "You can't do a fact-check, even though the crab-sentence is a fact-check, and you've destroyed every frail-ass argument i came up with, dur dee doo!' Then finally, they can just post some weak, backwards-congratulatory nonsense like 'this is somewhat correct.':adfkjdk: it is no different than the ten thousand other victories i've experienced on thecoli and will continue to experience. :ajlkfdj:begone!

 

[HabitualChiller]

no comebacks:adjlfksjfskf:when they're frantically searching for something, ANYTHING to say to overcome my impeccable logic. "You can't do a fact-check, even though the crab-sentence is a fact-check, and you've destroyed every frail-ass argument i came up with, dur dee doo!' Then finally, they can just post some weak, backwards-congratulatory nonsense like 'this is somewhat correct.':adfkjdk: it is no different than the ten thousand other victories i've experienced on thecoli and will continue to experience. :ajlkfdj:begone!

:fryunsure:

 

[Sukairain]

Modern humans have only been around 200,000 years. We haven't existed long enough to have massive evolutionary differences yet

 

[jackswstd]

Back when the History channel wasn't complete trash, they had a program about how Neanderthals died out because Cro-Magnon became the dominant species

 

[Benefited]

Now this is a question that should be pondered....

I pondered it and rejected the idea years ago based on that alone:respect:

But their response will always be "Bu bu but it was billions of years"

These guys really cling to European ideas like nobodys business,its sad really.

 

[Sex Luthor]

mufukkas really posting pics of monkey genealogies as if that invalidates what i said. hey geniuses, if i get out of a swimming pool, am i banned from the goddamn pool for eternity or can i get back in it at some point in time? humans supposedly evolved over BILLIONS of years, so there should have been people who were in the water at some point. it's a mathematical certainty.

Why? Humans learned they can eat shyt in the water. Almost all of our basic instincts are for land dwelling. Animals that developed gills or bigger lungs or whatever to live in water spend most of their life in water. Humans don't. We evolved from fur every where to stay warm. Height, weight, skin tone, skin thickness and all kinds of other things bc we live mostly on land. There could be some humans that lived in the water. We don't know much about our oceans so it could've been and we just haven't discovered it yet. So nobody knows for sure

 

[010101]

there's mad different species of primates

same way different species of other genus & family of life forms

your a comedian ha

*

 

[Yade]

I tell people don’t put all your eggs in one basket when it comes to science

It’s all THEORIES not matter how much you tryna and spin it and they’re always changing

 

[Benefited]

OP your on the right track,good for you for rejecting the indoctrination of the European. I don't have the capability to test so called Neanderthal DNA myself. I've heard too many different things about Neanderthals from Europeans. But more than likely Neanderthals were nothing more than just another ape species. Europeans of today are nothing more than mutations of black people. More than likely albinos were forced out and populated among each other. Possibly a mutation in the black man due to volcanic catasrophy where we fled into mountains caves,and there was a lack of sunlight. Genes can turn on and off based on sunlight as well as diet so if the Albinos were forced to eat a high diet of monkey/"neanderthal" it could explain why it shows up in their dna alot more than saying that the black man was fukking Harry And The Henddersons.Cacs were more than likely the first gmo'd nikkas. Now I guess they are getting payback as you nikkas of today put whatever they feed you into your body. You are the next wave of the gmo'd original man. Some of you want to be the white man so bad,well biologically you will be soon enough,we are already seeing symptoms:respect:

 

[Take It In Blood]

omicron

 

[BaldingSoHard]

you said that humans evolved from beings that abandoned water and that evolution doesn't 'work backwards.' if something happened that created people that could live underwater, which is entirely possible, you would try to move the goalposts and say it was only evolution in another direction. this is why there can be no true discourse with your type, bc you do not even have the tools to begin with.

There's no such thing as de-evolution, breh.

Yes, I understand you found a wikipedia article regarding it and thus you believe it must exist.

But as the other breh said, I don't think you actually read the article you linked.

 

[BaldingSoHard]

Did you actually read what you just linked us to, homie?

For real. That entry is hilarious.