If Ray Allen didn't make that three...

[WOAHMYGOODNESS]

Why do nikkas cling to this narative? Is it because yall were surprised arguably the greatest 3pt shooter made a clutch 3? Is It because a team was saved by someone not paid the highest or their leading scorer like how steve lerr, derek fisher, Robert Horry and various guys saved championship caliber teams from losing games?
Or is it because it was lebrons team being save?

 

[McPiff]

Because they're insecure fakkets.

They will constently bring that up but will forgot the LeNoHeadBand 4th quarter that Bron had and the clutch 3 he made with less than a minute left.

 

[FTBS]

Because their hearts dropped when that shyt went in. Bron is the only player in history who has a teammates clutch play held against him. The last second heroics of those guys you mentioned not only didn't take away from the reputations of the superstars that they played with it actually added to them. nikkas make up their own rules and completely ignore everything from history to logic to what actually transpires to shyt on dude.

 

[Everythingg]

Lebron almost messed that game up wit turnovers if I remember right

If Ray Allen doesnt hit that three we looking at Lebron like when it comes to his all time superstar status.

 

[ThaGlow]

I'd rather blame missed free throws, expecially close games or games that go yo OT. It's a free shot. Free. Straight shot. You can even get a second chance with the backboard to get a friendly bounce.

 

[Roadie pipeher]

You are expecting hypocritical biggedy bytches to see earlier instances? Horry and fish saved their squads way more than they can acknowledge..

 

[FTBS]

Lebron almost messed that game up wit turnovers if I remember right

If Ray Allen doesnt hit that three we looking at Lebron like when it comes to his all time superstar status.

So what does it say about the way that "we" look at guys that a shot made/missed by another person has any bearing on their all time superstar status?

 

[madness]

according to these fakkits lebron is the first/only star to:

-play on a team with other all-stars
-flop
-have a role player hit a clutch 3
-lose multiple Finals
-play in a weak conference


all the shyt that has been going on since the inception of the NBA gets held against him for some odd reason. shyt is comical

 

[MikelArteta]

if ray allen didnt make that 3 the heat lose that game and the series, and lebrons only ring is in a lockout year

 

[madeyoulook]

according to these fakkits lebron is the first/only star to:

-play on a team with other all-stars
-flop
-have a role player hit a clutch 3
-lose multiple Finals
-play in a weak conference


all the shyt that has been going on since the inception of the NBA gets held against him for some odd reason. shyt is comical

which other player in his prime joined another superstar and an all star in their primes as well? which player did that and was regarded as the best in the universe by his stans?

 

[bl2k8]

You are expecting hypocritical biggedy bytches to see earlier instances? Horry and fish saved their squads way more than they can acknowledge..

Because ray Allen's shot not going means the heat lose the series and title. Horry saved the Lakers from going down 3-1

 

[Everythingg]

So what does it say about the way that "we" look at guys that a shot made/missed by another person has any bearing on their all time superstar status?

Its not just that. Its that he almost LOST that game with his turnovers. So without counting this year, he would have had 3 losses in the finals. You can admit that having three losses in the finals (2 as a result of his own negligence) is a negative right?

 

[Ronnie Lott]

if ray allen didnt make that 3 the heat lose that game and the series, and lebrons only ring is in a lockout year

If, if, if

 

[Ronnie Lott]

Start @1:15, if paxon doesn't hit the shot. Bulls lose

 

[FTBS]

Its not just that. Its that he almost LOST that game with his turnovers. So without counting this year, he would have had 3 losses in the finals. You can admit that having three losses in the finals (2 as a result of his own negligence) is a negative right?

"That" is what this what we are talking about though. You can't say 3 L's in the Finals is a negative (thusly ignoring circumstances and the play of others) and then dwell on circumstances and the play of others in a win.