If ur not religious yet homophobic... somethings wrong with u

[Detroit Wave]

terrible thread

uneducated fakkit op doesnt even know what phobia means

 

[Dameon Farrow]

Hold up, r u saying that the fact that homosexuality occurs in nature... does not make it natural?

All the examples u stated including homosexuality r natural, idiot. And u seem to be under the impression that anything that does not directly promote a species survival 100% is unnatural. I don't know where you got that idea. And also, species getting made and dying off, is also part of nature breh.

And again, homosexuality is not at all a threat to humanity nor am I awarw of it having been a threat to any other species, ever. So I dont know why u guys even bother to bring that up. shyt, its been with us since our very beginnings .

So this is what a smart dumb nikka post looks like.

Since you are a little slow I will break this down and show which one of us is the real idiot. Anyone not in their feelings will know that the implications of my post is that just because something exists doesn't make it prevalent. Get it now or should I explain that even further? It also doesn't make it natural. The things I listed I listed to make a point...just because animals do it doesn't make it right. Get it now or should I break that down further? You say getting made and dying off is natural. In the world of homosexuality, dying off is the end game, what's getting made? Nothing as there is no further reproduction. Get it? You actually proved my point through and through bringing that up. Thanks, breh.

 

[Killer Instinct]

I'm sure this is about my thread so I'll reply.

Define homophobic. :hmmjb:

Are you mad?
The idea of destroying a rectum for sexual gratification is sickening. It is also culturally immoral behaviour.

If you not religious why would you defend gays unless you were gay by that logic....and the answer is we dont need god to tell us that shyt aint right....your gut tells you one thing about homosexuality other peoples say another

OP started a thread a few days back asking would any member of the board be opposed to their loved ones reading their posts.
Ironically, he professed his love for trannsexuals and shemales in that initial OP, and then went back to promptly edit it before the thread got half a dozen posts.
His disputation concerning the topic isn't shocking by any means, all things considered.
In fact, it makes perfect sense.
But hey..

 

[Mac Tyson]

Are you mad?
The idea of destroying a rectum for sexual gratification is sickening. It is also culturally immoral behaviour.

What I listed is something I find bad. I hate what is bad. I don't like and encourage something that is against logical sense. Gay activity is something created by white cacs, it is a shame that black people are trying to find reasons to accept it. We should never accept it.

How are we over populated when we as Black Americans have lower population than Whites and Hispanics. Gay is a form of population control that white people practice and are trying to get black people to adopt.

So this is what a smart dumb nikka post looks like.

Since you are a little slow I will break this down and show which one of us is the real idiot. Anyone not in their feelings will know that the implications of my post is that just because something exists doesn't make it prevalent. Get it now or should I explain that even further? It also doesn't make it natural. The things I listed I listed to make a point...just because animals do it doesn't make it right. Get it now or should I break that down further? You say getting made and dying off is natural. In the world of homosexuality, dying off is the end game, what's getting made? Nothing as there is no further reproduction. Get it? You actually proved my point through and through bringing that up. Thanks, breh.

I just realized I dont wanna argue about gays all day. With smart dumb nikkas at that.

 

[Mac Tyson]

OP started a thread a few days back asking would any member of the board be opposed to their loved ones reading their posts.
Ironically, he professed his love to trannsexuals and shemales in that initial OP, and then went back to promptly edit it before the thread got half a dozen posts.
His disputation concerning the topic isn't shocking by any means, all things considered.
In fact, it makes perfect sense.
But hey..

I edited OP to get more replies

 

[Killer Instinct]

I edited OP to get more replies

Right on.

 

[Londilon]

I just realized I dont wanna argue about gays all day. With smart dumb nikkas at that.

Don't make a stupid thread and you wont have to run away from it in shame.

 

[DIMES]

That is apparently most of the coli, if im not wrong. Like if u dont have a religious reason for hating homosexuals... why do u do

Like what about a man liking men
What about what a man does in the privacy of his own bedroom
What about a man possibly having female mannerisms

Brings out such ugly, and at times very passionate, hate out of yall nikkas? And most importantly, why do u care so much

Plz respond

i will not a gay enter my home. i put on a facade of tolerance in public just like everyone else who pretends its normal. but i hate gays but i have rational tolerance... i won't on sight kill a gay but i look down on them and pity them. its a disease that is so sick and prevalent that ppl would rather turn the cheek than confront it.

 

[sun raw]

why are people so dumb that they assume that dislike = fear and misuse the suffix -phobia?

i dont like cauliflower, does that make me cauliflowerphobic?

if we're going to play a dumb semantics game, -phobia also means "an aversion to" and I'd say most people would consider hate to be an extreme take on aversion

 

[Detroit Wave]

if we're going to play a dumb semantics game, -phobia also means "an aversion to" and I'd say most people would consider hate to be an extreme take on aversion

i really dislike cauliflower. does that make me a cauliflowerphobic?

 

[sun raw]

i really dislike cauliflower. does that make me a cauliflowerphobic?

Sure why not